Language selection

Search


Fact sheets: Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security: Main Estimates 2026-2027 (May 28, 2026)

CBSA stats and facts

2025 Stats and Figures January 1 to

Budget – A and B base (source of info: 2026–2027 Main Estimates)

2025 to 2027 CBSA budget (in millions $)
(in millions $) 2025–2026 CBSA budget 2026–2027 CBSA budget
A-Base (Ongoing) funding 1,983 1,951.6
B-Base (Temporary) funding 729 779.9
Statutory (Employee Benefit Plan) 281 338.4
Total budget 2,993 3,069.9

FTEs – uniformed, operational and support

Approximately 17,000 employees
over 8,500 front line
1,200 ports of entry and in 36 countries.

Ports of entry – air, land, marine

  • 117 land-border crossings – 61 on a 24/7 basis
  • 13 international airports – 10 on a 24/7 basis
  • 27 rail sites
  • 5 Major Ports (Port of Vancouver, B.C., Port of Prince Rupert, B.C., Port of Montreal, QC, Port of Halifax, NS, Port of Saint John, NB), 213 Commercial Vessel designated sites, numerous marinas and reporting stations

IT Contracts – number and amount and decrease over past years (source of info: Q1 report to TBS)

18 IT consultants as of , compared to 250 in .

The reduction in consultants reflects the CBSA's steady decline in overall contract use. The amount of active contracts has reduced by 55% between and from 2275 to 1027.

Executives

  • 44% of VPs/RDGs have served on the frontline (8 out of 18)
  • 35.7% of the Executive cadre (at all levels) worked on the frontline directly supporting the CBSA mandate at some point in their career (91 out of 255)
  • 48.2% of the Executive cadre (at all levels) have either worked directly on the frontline and/or occupied a role that required supervision of frontline employees (123 out of 255)
  • 66% of VPs and RDGs are women (12 out of 18)

Travellers in 2026 (to )

  • 17,716,640 travellers:
    • Air: 9,353,300
    • Highway: 8,273,598
      • including 1,296,161 truck drivers
    • Marine: 63,027
    • Rail: 26,715
  • 8,736,431 travellers used Primary inspection kiosks
  • 1,040,021 travellers used Advanced Declaration
  • 2.17 million NEXUS members

Commercial goods imports in 2026 (to )

  • 8,602,774 releases of goods into the commerce of Canada
  • 23,913,206 courier shipments
  • $64.85 Billion Trusted Trader value for duty imported
  • Commercial by the numbers:
    • Highway: 1,194,961 trucks
    • Air: 943,681 shipments
    • Marine: 504,456 containers
    • Rail: 469,527 cars

Food, plant and animal 2026 (to )

A total of 877 Agriculture and Agri-Food Administrative Monetary Penalties (AAAMP) issued for food, plant and animal import violations totaling $724,700 in penalties.

Enforcement in 2026 (to )

A total of 11,765 seizures, intercepted and seized in Canada (from US and other countries), including:

  • 118 seizures for a total of 167 firearms seized
  • 1,752 seizures for a total of 3,589 weapons seized
  • 5,498 illegal drugs seizures
    • Cocaine (including coca leaves, coca paste, cocaine and cocaine crack): 857 kilograms
    • Heroin: 179 kilograms
    • Fentanyl: 0.139 kilograms
    • Methamphetamines: 1,104 kilograms
    • Other opioids (including opium, methadone, morphine and morphine base): 676 kilograms
    • Other drugs, narcotics and chemicals: 4,246 kilograms (this number excludes cocaine, heroin, fentanyl, methamphetamine, other opioids and cannabis)
  • 2,881 cannabis seizures totaling 10,422 kilograms
  • 2,422 tobacco seizures totaling 35,710 kilograms
  • 29 child pornography seizures

Firearm seizures in 2026 (to )

  • Total firearms seized: 167
  • Total firearms seizures: 118
Firearm seizures by types
Firearm type Quantity
Miscellaneous (for example, replica firearms, firearms parts, large capacity magazines, silencers, etc.) 3,534
Handgun 88
Semiauto pistol 20
Revolver 14
Rifle 15
Full auto carbine 0
Shotgun 19
Other (including full auto rifle and semiauto carbine) 3
Semiautomatic rifle 8
Antique firearm 0

Weapons seizures in 2026 (to )

  • Total weapons seized: 3,589
  • Total weapon seizures: 1,752
Weapons seizures by types
Prohibited weapons type Quantity
Brass Knuckle 691
Automatic opening knife 1,366
Centrifugal opening knife 789
Stun Gun 388
Kiyoga/steel cobra baton 86
Tear Gas/pepper spray 88
Innocuous device with knife 73
Bladed Ring 4
Taser 32
Push dagger 47
Gravity opening knife 8
Crossbow (one handed use) 1
Shuriken 5
Nunchaku 6
Other (including Constant Companion knife, Kusari/Manrikigusari) 3
Morning Star 0
Blowgun 2

Breakdown of LO-Intervened off-boards (to )

# of Clients Intercepted / Offloaded by the International Network
Year Suspected Fraud Technical Total
2021 2,647 16,608 19,255
2022 6,587 2,162 8,749
2023 7,496 1,239 8,735
2024 9,920 1,132 11,052
2025 - - 7,037
Current Detention Population By Region on Monday
CBSA Regions Immigration Holding Centre Other Total
Atlantic 0 0 0
QuebecTablenote 1 68 1 69
Northern Ontario 0 0 0
Greater Toronto Area 57 0 57
Southern Ontario 0 0 0
Prairie 0 5 5
Pacific 63 1 64
Summary 188 7 195

The summaries provide a numerical count of the individuals in custody during the specified time period. This number may be lower than the combined totals, due to the overlap of the same individual(s) across the separate time frames. An individual who overlaps time frames will be counted in each time frame, but only once in the summary.

"Detentions in other facilities includes other law enforcement agencies (in other words, RCMP detachments, local and provincial police cells), CBSA ports of entry (POE) and inland enforcement (IE) cells."

Alternatives to Detention (ATDs) Statistics

Overview of Current ATD Participants as of
Province ATD Client Count
Newfoundland and Labrador 17
Nova Scotia 63
Prince Edward Island 0
New Brunswick 45
Québec 1,871
Ontario 8,727
Manitoba 538
Saskatchewan 116
Alberta 1,607
British Columbia 2,429
Nunavut 0
North West Territories 0
Yukon 0
Total 15,413

Allowed to Leaves issued at POEs

2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
Number of Allowed to Leaves issued at POE 37,304 44,948 40,693 6,566
  • If an officer at a port of entry examines a foreign national and the person is believed to be inadmissible, the officer may in some circumstances allow the person to voluntarily withdraw their application to enter Canada and allow them to depart
  • Each case will be assessed individually and a decision will be based on the specific facts of the case and whether the objectives of the IRPA would be best achieved without seeking a formal removal order

Inadmissibility (A44) Reports (serious inadmissibility grounds)

2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
A44 reports – serious inadmissibility grounds 3,590 4,358 4,765 1,404
  • The above represents A44 reports for the following IRPA inadmissibility grounds: security, human rights violations, serious criminality, criminality, organized crime, sanctions and transborder criminality
  • A finding of inadmissibility begins with the officer making an allegation by preparing an inadmissibility (A44) report which is supported by evidence
  • A44 is then reviewed by another official (Minister's Delegate) who may issue a prescribed removal order if the inadmissibility allegation is within their jurisdiction or refer the A44 report to the Immigration and Refugee Board for an admissibility hearing

Stolen vehicles

Region 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
Atlantic (ATL) 73 30 100 118 51 188 142 192 50
Quebec (QUE) 348 605 816 1,020 1,050 1,204 1,313 972 189
Northern Ontario (NOR) 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0
Southern Ontario (SOR) 4 5 2 0 9 0 0 0 0
Greater Toronto Area (GTA) 25 69 250 194 229 773 680 211 18
Prairies 2 2 0 1 0 0 6 10 0
Pacific 11 55 75 10 6 0 136 205 22
Total 463 766 1,244 1,345 1,348 1,806 2,277 1,590 279

In 2024, 2,758 Requests for Information were processed, rising to 3,884 in 2025 (+40%). As of , 638 requests have been processed, submitted by police of jurisdiction and insurance agencies investigating fraud and vehicle export theft claims.

Anti-dumping (As of )

As of , the CBSA has conducted 5 anti-dumping and countervailing investigations across 3 product groups, spanning the mineral oil, paper, plastic, and predominantly steel industries, involving 2 countries, primarily China. Of the 5 investigations, all are ongoing.

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
# of products 4 6 6 1 7 4 2 1 5 9 3
# of investigations handled 16 18 18 6 28 7 4 2 12 33 5

Active Investigations:

  1. Forged Grinding Media
    Steel balls or similar shapes made by forging or stamping, used mainly in mining and cement industries to crush and grind ore in ball mills
  2. Oil and Gas Well Casing
    Steel pipes and casing used in oil and gas wells to support the well structure and transport oil or gas during drilling and production operations
  3. Unarmoured Building Cables
    Electrical cables made of insulated copper or aluminum conductors used to permanently distribute electricity in residential, commercial, and industrial buildings
  4. Thermoformed Molded Fibre TablewareFootnote 1
    Plates, bowls, and take-out containers made from recycled paper pulp. They’re pressed into shape (molded) and often used as eco-friendly disposable tableware
  5. Truck BodiesFootnote 1
    Rigid structures mounted onto truck chassis that are designed to contain or support goods during on-road transportation. These include box-type truck bodies (insulated or non-insulated), refrigerated bodies, and truck body kits or assemblies

Enforcement statistics

Drugs

Key Takeaways (Q1 of calendar year 2025 and calendar year 2026)

  • In Q1 of calendar year 2025, a total of 2,949,688g of cannabis was seized. This then surged to 10,422,190 in Q1 of calendar year 2026, representing an increase of about 253%
  • Q1 of calendar year 2025 recorded 403,610g of methamphetamine seized. This later climbed to 1,104,147g in Q1 of calendar year 2026. This is an increase of about 174%
  • In Q1 of 2025 the CBSA seized 124,946g of other opioids. Later, in Q1 of 2026 the CBSA seized 675,899g of other opioids. This represents an increase of about 440%
  • The quantity of heroin seized increased by about 436% when comparing Q1 of calendar year 2025 (33,327g) to Q1 of calendar year 2026 (178,518g)
  • In total, Q1 of 2026 (17,483,600g) recorded a larger quantity of drugs seized than Q1 of calendar year 2025 (12,818,884g). A total increase of 36% was observed

Key Takeaways (Overall Quantities in grams)

  • The 2025 seizure total (83,210,800g) exceeds the total reported for all of 2024 (52,056,505g). This represents a 60% increase
  • Compared with 2023 (79,352,888g), seizure numbers in 2024 (52,056,505g) were lower, reflecting a downward trend. This is a decrease of about 34%
  • 2020 recorded the lowest amount of seizures (30,150,272g). This is likely due to low traveller volumes during the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • In 2022, 55,618,092g of seizures were recorded. This then surged to 79,352,888g seized in 2023. This represents approximately a 43% increase

Key Takeaways (Overall - Count of Seizure Actions)

  • 2023 recorded the highest amount of seizure actions (39,057)
  • Seizure activity decreased in 2024 (28,339), compared to the 2023 count (39,057). This is a decrease of about 27%
  • 2024 recoded 28,339 seizure actions. This number then increased to 31,680 in 2025, representing a 12% increase

The most drug seizures were made in X Region, the least in X Region

  • From to . GTAR recorded the highest amount of drug seizures (154,752,088g)
  • From to , NOR recorded the least amount of seizures (744,502g)

Specific commodities where import seizures are up are/Specific commodities where import seizures are down:

Commodity Seized (g) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
Cannabis 3,617,026.28 4,676,476.16 2,523,144.54 10,400,202.15 4,750,460.97 3,765,572.20 1,697,293.74
Cocaine 1,175,871.06 1,159,075.53 3,094,102.76 1,752,739.21 4,542,856.67 4,309,886.22 849,948.13
Methamphetamine 616,046.26 374,698.22 584,328.01 2,189,346.68 1,200,771.25 1,258,946.57 340,569.94
Other Opioids 693,362.30 1,206,745.73 5,942,460.63 2,784,245.61 348,704.09 1,140,432.52 674,183.19
Fentanyl 2,421.00 2,815.63 1,410.95 616.38 661.33 314.25 36.10
Heroin 91,291.62 131,200.65 387,172.86 87,524.96 3,044.29 123,669.98 178,518.50
All Other Drugs 20,526,320.05 20,615,576.09 30,089,838.98 40,543,191.82 26,837,717.86 27,183,862.29 4,094,968.84

All quantities are in grams

Specific commodities where export seizures are up/ Specific commodities where export seizures are down:

Commodity Seized 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
Cannabis 3,101,582.16 7,610,512.65 11,147,571.68 13,200,661.79 13,032,517.11 42,835,410.14 8,724,896.86
Cocaine 12,190.16 155,995.17 40,689.29 34,946.04 46,100.86 389,368.80 7,135.15
Methamphetamine 170,745.97 511,377.42 1,156,453.48 7,939,500.06 971,741.15 1,138,479.11 763,577.35
Other Opioids 29.51 119.00 245,994.29 3,563.54 899.88 3,649.15 1,716.02
Fentanyl 4,475.10 87.28 2,471.27 43.24 4,269.60 2,456.15 102.60
Heroin 530.40 359.10 10,642.20 98.40 34,955.53 4,469.19 0.00
All Other Drugs 138,377.86 94,783.18 391,811.73 416,208.22 281,804.56 1,002,866.03 150,654.01

All quantities are in grams

The five year trend for drug seizures is:

Overall Import vs. Export Seizures (g)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Import 26,722,338.48 28,166,592.61 42,624,458.75 57,757,835.11 37,684,209.42 37,782,844.59
Export 3,427,934.48 8,373,229.20 12,993,633.92 21,595,052.99 14,372,295.73 45,376,538.02
Count of Seizure Actions - Import vs. Export
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Import 32,633 27,269 21,533 42,063 25,808 23,781
Export 2,692 6,498 9,708 7,201 6,621 7,899
Commodity Seized 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
1,4-butanediol (BDO) 0.00 0.00 83,152.00 9,920,101.00 183,670.00 390,748.10 3,497.00
1-Phenyl-2-propanone 0.00 0.00 31,570.00 36,678.00 4,568,300.00 27,158.00 0.00
3,4-Methylenedioxyphenyl-2-pro 0.00 0.00 5,983,371.25 6,075,213.80 326,709.80 2,442.00 0.00
Ephedrine 3,159.30 8,173.78 177,040.71 54,821.67 31,997.25 186,695.16 238,453.90
Ergotamine 175.73 110.00 95.01 115.16 248.24 20.05 39.77
Gamma butyrolactone (GBL) 0.00 0.00 1,351,494.00 263,579.00 53,236.00 1,056,430.00 0.00
Lysergic Acid 3.00 112.00 37.01 8.00 32.02 9.55 16.00
N-Acetylanthranilic Acid 1,284.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Norephedrine 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Phenylacetic Acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,800.00 0.00
Piperidine 603.70 0.10 351,354.00 67,060.30 1,000.00 28.00 0.00
Potassium Permanganate 0.00 3.00 1,220.00 928.00 0.00 2,396.20 509.70
Pseudoephedrine 57.30 184.70 74.00 1,409.00 856.30 2,077.30 240.00
White phosphorus 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 3,280.00 0.00
Ergometrine 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Hypophosphorous acid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,570.00 0.00
Grand Total 5,283.03 8,583.58 7,979,487.98 16,419,913.93 5,166,059.61 1,685,654.36 242,757.37

The above table shows the quantity of precursor chemicals seized in grams only.

The five year trend for precursor seizures is:

Precursors - Import vs. Export (g)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Import 4,584.43 7,207.48 7,951,586.57 16,375,852.93 5,138,477.68 1,638,936.72
Export 698.6 1,376.1 27,901.41 44,061 27,581.93 46,717.64

Firearms

Commodity Type 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
Firearms 495 1,071 1,100 920 883 833 167
Weapons 52,230 63,571 20,906 27,134 17,260 17,771 3,589
Firearms Seizures
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Firearms 495 1,071 1,100 920 883 833
Weapon Seizures
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Weapon 52,230 63,571 20,906 27,134 17,260 17,735

CBSA Criminal Investigation Prosecution Outcomes:

2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
Firearms cases with findings of guilt 18 18 38 29 42 16
Firearms and prohibited weapons cases with findings of guilt 21 24 47 37 49 21

Charge/Prosecution Acceptance Rate:

From to , over 96% of the charge recommendations made by the CSBA to the Crown following firearms and weapons investigations undertaken by the CBSA, have resulted in charges approved.

Results of CBSA search warrants away from the border (as part of criminal investigations):

Items seized during CBSA search warrants
Prohibited Firearms Firearms Restricted/Non Restricted Prohibited Firearms Parts Firearms Parts Prohibited Weapons Prohibited Devices
to 95 225 102 275 3,020 152
to 1 36 0 26 2 6

Note: Not all firearms seized away from the border are associated to allegations of smuggling or other border offences. Some may be seized for other "plain view" offences, such as unsafe storage, when investigators are lawfully present pursuant to a CBSA search warrant.

Search warrant data is collated manually on a quarterly basis.

Stolen vehicles

Stolen vehicle trend

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
351 346 463 766 1,244 1,345 1,348 1,806 2,277 1,590 279

Undeclared currency

Currency and Suspected Proceeds of Crime Seizures

Commodity Seized 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
Currency 11,526,423 13,291,159 14,608,802 25,098,868 33,615,096 38,578,579 6,200,606.66
Suspected Proceeds of Crime 3,273,025 2,557,668 1,427,023 3,622,294 5,474,724 3,857,578 593,734.19
Currency Seizures
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Currency 11,526,423 13,291,159 14,608,802 25,098,868 33,615,096 38,578,579
Suspected Proceeds of Crime Seizures
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Suspected Proceeds of Crime 3,273,025 2,557,668 1,427,023 3,622,294 5,474,724 3,857,578

Asylum Statistics

Number of recommended offboards by CBSA ILOs

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
2832Footnote 1 10,756 12,018 13,154 16,592 19,255 8,749 8,735 11,052 7,037

The number of asylum claims in the last 10 years are:

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1 Total
CBSA 11,342 22,208 29,545 29,486 7,950 13,052 64,551 72,809 59,401 34,015 4,182 348,541
IRCC 12,537 28,666 25,615 34,668 15,790 12,060 27,655 71,349 113,560 80,518 14,558 436,976
Total 23,879 50,874 55,160 64,154 23,740 25,112 92,206 144,158 172,961 114,533 18,740 785,517

Percentage increase 2016–2025: The percentage difference for both agencies combined between 2016 and 2025 is an increase of 380%)

Percentage increase 2022–2025: The percentage difference for both agencies combined between 2022 and 2025 is an increase of 24%)

The number of asylum claims at Lacolle are:

2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
20,415 8,158 15,369 1,481

Number of IRB asylum hearings with CBSA representation

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
2,995 2,938 3,137 3,973 5,099 3,819 4,286 5,057 6,347 6,812 1,1647

CBSA's annual removals:

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
7,636 8,746 8,385 11,271 12,851 7,513 8,328 15,220 17,382 22,576 7,156

CBSA's removal inventory (defined as removals in progress and wanted) is:

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
n/a n/a n/a 51,772 50,918 48,427 48,352 50,420 60,117 63,857 65,541

Projected removal inventory (including wanted and in progress) assuming at least 25,000 removals per year

2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
67,610 68,458 69,756 71,054 72,352

Assumptions:

  1. IRB maintains calendar year 2024 decision volume (approximately 73,000 decisions) and acceptance rate (63%). Although the new Asylum target for RPD is 80,000 to 85,000
  2. The CBSA enforces 25,000 removals per year (Note that the CBSA is currently funded for 20,000 in fiscal year 2026–2027, and 16,000 for future years)
  3. Impact of other inadmissibility cases (for example, overstays) is not included
  4. The CBSA will enforce 20,000 removals in 2025
  5. Bill C-12 impact on inventory is not included

[Redacted]

[Redacted]

CBSA's security screening inventory vs completed screens per year:

Intake:

Year IRCC Asylum claims received Number of Asylum claims referred for security screening IRCC visa applications (TR/PR) received Number of visa applications (TR/PR) referred for security screening Total number of files received by IRCC Total number of files referred to for security screening Number of recommendations completed by CINSS (Files Closed) Remaining Security Screening Inventory at the end of the calendar year
2023 143,310 132,204 (92.3%) 6,874,660 73,780 (1.1%) 7,017,970 205,984 (2.9%) 129,896 102,268
2024 171,840 152,934 (89.0%) 6,510,060 71,200 (1.1%) 6,681,900 224,134 (3.3%) 161,737 155,017
2025 113,105 98,209 (86.8%) 4,855,620 45,386 (0.9%) 4,968,725 143,595 (2.9%) 106,536 183,581
2026Tablenote 1 11,055 11,635 (105.2%) 763,790 6,470 (0.8%) 774,845 18,105 (2.3%) 16,304 184,250

Results:

Year Visa Applications (TR/PR) Asylum Claims Total
Non-favourable Favourable + Inconclusive + Non-favourable Favourable + Inconclusive + Non-favourable Favourable + Inconclusive +
2023 802 (2.1%) 33,860 (89.0%) 2,071 (5.4%) 127 (0.1%) 81,988 (89.3%) 4,262 (4.6%) 929 (0.7%) 115,848 (89.2%) 6,333 (4.9%)
2024 920 (2.2%) 36,103 (86.8%) 1,174 (2.8%) 152 (0.1%) 115,678 (96.3%) 952 (0.8%) 1,072 (0.7%) 151,781 (93.8%) 2,126 (1.3%)
2025 665 (2.6%) 21,357 (83.5%) 1,289 (5.0%) 159 (0.2%) 78,389 (96.8%) 356 (0.4%) 824 (0.8%) 99,746 (93.6%) 1,645 (1.5%)
2026Tablenote 1 195 (4.3%) 3,936 (87.4%) 138 (3.1%) 33 (03.3%) 11,265 (95.5%) 91 (0.8%) 228 (1.4%) 15,201 (93.2%) 229 (1.4%)

CBSA's Detention Capacity is:

BC IHC Toronto IHC Laval IHC Ste. Anne Des Pleines Total
75 beds (+25 cots) 166 beds (+50 cots) 131 beds (+25 cots) 25 beds (high-risk only 397 (max is 497)

Note: The bed capacity includes low/medium and high-risk spaces. Temporary Cots are available for emergency use only, and could only be deployed for low/medium risk individuals.

CBSA's detention rates:

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
5,969 8,540 8,489 9,193 3,104 2,475 4,902 5,191 4,276 3,604 1,558

CBSA's detention rate as a percentage of asylum claims

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
45% 32% 30% 33% 40% 40% 38% 47% 53% 52% 54%

Notes:

  • Asylum claimants captured in this section include cases where the individual has already received a negative decision. The CBSA does not detain asylum seekers simply because they make a claim

Trade Statistics

Anti dumping and subsidy investigations – initiated

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
# of products 4 6 6 1 7 4 2 1 5 9 3
# of investigations handled 16 18 18 6 28 7 4 2 12 33 5

Sanctions Implementation – number of sanctions in place being enforced by CBSA

There are currently 12 countries against which there are import sanctions and 22 countries against which there are export sanctions. In recent years, the Government of Canada has increased its use of sanctions, currently imposing sanctions on 355 Harmonized System (HS) codes, as well as all goods being imported from North Korea and Syria. The CBSA's responsibility for exports is broader and requires ensuring compliance for all exports to North Korea, a wide range of industrial goods to Iran, and all exports to specific entities (people and businesses) in 19 other countries (for example, Myanmar, Sudan, Iraq). The current sanctions against Russia are the most extensive with 935 different HS codes covering industrial and luxury goods.

Duties and Taxes Compliance Statistics

Duties and taxes collected

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
30,328,382,095.11 31,936,176,632.49 34,854,643,704.04 33,425,365,815.31 28,182,435,842.93 33,290,518,168.28
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
39,352,361,078.33 39,757,683,389.86 39,553,010,699.70 45,926,428,701.13 14,474,149,831.26

Number of Compliance Verification Audits Completed and Amounts Assessed

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
n/a n/a 1,203 1,386 651 989 833 814 815 598 251
n/a n/a $395.2 million $153.8 million $36.5 million $442.0 million $286.4 million $98.9 million $73.2 million $129.9 million $60.3 million

Additional Information:

Number of Compliance Interventions and Amount Assessed:

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 98 276 409 222
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $61.3 million $9.99 million $71.8 million $14.4 million

Strategic Export Enforcement - Sanctions and Counter-Proliferation Referrals for Enforcement by Counter-Proliferation Operations Section (CPOS)

  2016–2017 2020–2021 2021–2022 2022–2023 2023–2024 2024–2025 2025–2026 YTDTablenote 1
Total Export Declarations reviewed by CPOS 1,069,891 1,239,346 1,259,576 1,608,857 1,573,312 1,227,237 781,001
Sanctions-related Export Referrals to Regions 10 4 12 59 76 145 106
Non-Sanctions Export Referrals to Regions 361 628 657 702 841 665 588

Removals

Removals expenditures by region and branch (in millions of dollars)

Removals expenditures 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026
Atlantic Region 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.2 2.2
Quebec Region 8.7 10.0 12.8 17.9 22.4
Northern Ontario Region 2.2 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.3
Greater Toronto Area Region 15.6 14.5 17.4 20.0 21.7
Southern Ontario Region 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.3
Prairie Region 8.9 9.7 9.7 11.9 13.0
Pacific Region 5.8 7.0 7.3 9.0 8.7
Regions subtotal 42.3 45.3 51.4 63.6 70.5
Intelligence & Enforcement Branch 2.4 4.4 5.1 6.1 7.5
Strategic Policy Branch 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.8
Information & Management Systems 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Information, Science & Technology Branch 0.4 0.9 3.2 0.2 0.7
HQ Total 3.2 5.3 8.4 7.1 9.0
EBP & Refund of prior year expenditures 4.8 5.5 6.0 7.5 7.9
Total 50.3 56.0 65.8 78.3 87.4

In 2025, the Canada Border Services Agency completed 23,178 removals, of which 1,184 (5%) were serious inadmissibility cases (for example, criminality, national security, war crimes, human rights violations and organized crime).

The Agency has been working to increase the number of removals completed each year; $55.5 million was received under the Border Plan to increase removals by 25% to 20,000 in 2025-2026 and 2026-2027.

Removals by year
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Removals 12,856 7,513 8,330 15,225 17,405 23,178

Unsuccessful claimants represent the great number of cases entering the enforcement continuum, and being processed for removal. The surge in recent years of asylum claims has directly impacted the of the overall growth of the three of the four Removals Inventories.

Between 2020 and 2025, the Removal in Progress inventory increased by 63%, Recent efforts to increase removals have resulted in the volume stabilizing since 2024, with less than 1% growth from 2024 to 2025, and a slight rise so far in 2026 (31,929 at the end of April).

The Removal Not Possible inventory experienced a similar level of growth over the same time period increasing by 60%. Nearly half of the cases in this inventory are subject to legislated stays of removal, including Administrative Deferrals of Removal and Temporary Suspensions of Removal. As a result, overall inventory levels continue to experience pressure despite increased enforcement activity. significantly increased.

Historic removal and inventory volume
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 to date
Removals completed 12,856 7,513 8,330 15,225 17,405 23,178 7,156
Removals in progress 18,628 19,089 18,921 21,038 30,186 30,356 29,817

While the other inventories have grown, the Wanted Inventory, has remained relatively stable growing only 4% between 2020 and 2025. The low level of growth in the Wanted inventory, shows non-compliance represent a relatively small and stable component of overall system pressure.

Removals inventory by year
Dec
2020
Dec
2021
Change from 2020 Dec
2022
Change from 2021 Dec
2023
Change from 2022 Dec
2024
Change from 2023 Dec
2025
Change from 2024 Overall Change (2020–2025) Apr
2026Tablenote 1
Not Yet Actionable 148,209 128,008 minus14% 152,795 19% 255,999 68% 402,975 57% 477,651 19% 222% 483,130
Removal Not Possible 16,142 15,948 minus1% 19,960 25% 20,505 3% 20,755 1% 25,899 25% 60% 29,283
Wanted 32,290 29,338 minus9% 29,431 0% 29,382 0% 29,931 2% 33,501 12% 4% 33,522
Removal in Progress 18,628 19,089 2% 18,921 minus1% 21,038 11% 30,186 43% 30,356 1% 63% 31,929
Total 215,269 192,383 minus11% 221,107 15% 326,924 48% 483,847 48% 567,407 17% 164% 577,864

Definitions

  • Not Yet Actionable inventory includes individuals that fall outside of the enforcement stream including those pending refugee determination, a percentage of which will eventually enter Removals In Progress inventory, and convention refugees
  • Removal Not Possible inventory includes individuals that cannot currently be removed, including those pending Federal Court appeals, criminal charges, or Pre-Removal Risk Assessments, or serving a sentence of imprisonment
  • Wanted inventory includes individuals who failed to appear for removal proceedings and the CBSA is working to locate
  • Removal In Progress inventory includes individuals who can be processed for removal; at this stage, CBSA works with the individual and foreign countries to overcome challenges to removal, including the issuance of travel documents

Removals statistics

Removals by region

The CBSA collects removal data for all of Canada and organizes the data according to 7 regions.

Table 1.1: Total enforced removals by region (calendar year: 2019 to 2024 and quarterly for 2025)

Region 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2025 Q3 2025 Q4Tablenote 1 2025 TotalTablenote 1
Atlantic 139 57 69 60 104 158 49 59 27 48 183
Quebec 2,633 5,920 1,592 2,487 6,021 6,947 2,353 2,195 3,459 2,481 10,488
Northern Ontario 386 284 234 294 410 489 124 159 130 129 542
Greater Toronto Area 4,343 4,499 3,655 2,714 4,304 5,402 1,859 1,881 1,722 1,300 6,762
Southern Ontario 898 204 304 698 1,346 1,075 294 249 253 185 981
Prairie 967 966 830 588 770 1,112 375 338 443 377 1,533
Pacific 1,903 921 829 1,478 2,252 2,174 603 529 531 424 2,087
Grand total 11,269 12,851 7,513 8,319 15,207 17,357 5,657 5,410 6,565 4,944 22,576

Removals inventory by year

Table 1: Removals inventory movement by year
2021
February
2022
February
Change from 2021 2023
February
Change from 2022 2024
February
Change from 2023 2025
February
Change from 2024 2026
February
Change from 2025 Overall Change (2021–2026)
Not Yet Actionable 141,321 126,755 minus10% 155,514 23% 277,549 78% 420,061 51% 484,183 15% 243%
Removal Not Possible 15,474 15,936 3% 20,038 26% 21,066 5% 20,318 minus4% 27,560 36% 78%
Wanted 31,376 28,995 minus8% 29,295 1% 29,248 0% 31,276 7% 33,511 7% 7%
Removal in Progress 19,269 19,806 3% 19,012 minus4% 21,061 11% 30,446 45% 29,000 minus5% 51%
Total 207,440 191,492 minus8% 223,859 17% 348,924 56% 502,101 44% 574,254 14% 177%
Data is extracted from an archive repository, and is reflective of the nearest available data snapshot nearest to the month-end listed.
  • The Removal in Progress inventory has grown by 51% over the last five years; due to efforts to increase removal volumes under the Border Plan, the inventory decreased by 5% from to 2026
  • Over five years, the Wanted inventory has fluctuated year to year, and has grown 7% overall; it grew by 2,135 cases since 2021, while during the same period, the CBSA removed over 75,800 inadmissible foreign nationals from Canada
  • Of the total 27,560 individuals in the Removal Not Possible inventory, 14,071 are subject to ADR/TSR stay (see table 6)
  • CBSA removal efforts may be hindered and delayed by impediments such as uncooperative foreign nationals who do not provide necessary information or documentation to allow for their removal, or foreign governments that refuse the return of their nationals, or fail to promptly issue timely travel documents. The CBSA works closely with foreign governments, Canadian officials abroad, and other departments to resolve these challenges, and participates in international forums to identify joint strategies and best practices to achieve timely removals of inadmissible persons

Definitions

  • Not Yet Actionable inventory includes individuals that fall outside of the enforcement stream including those pending refugee determination, a percentage of which will eventually enter Removals In Progress inventory, and convention refugees
  • Removal Not Possible inventory includes individuals that cannot currently be removed, including those pending Federal Court appeals, criminal charges, or Pre-Removal Risk Assessments, or serving a sentence of imprisonment
  • Wanted inventory includes individuals who failed to appear for removal proceedings and the CBSA is working to locate
  • Removal In Progress inventory includes individuals who can be processed for removal; at this stage, CBSA works with the individual and foreign countries to overcome challenges to removal, including the issuance of travel documents

Removals inventory by month

Table 2: Removals inventory movement by month
  Overall Change (Feb – Feb)
Not yet Actionable 413,067 420,061 424,359 431,949 438,232 442,792 449,981 456,664 462,003 468,268 473,009 477,651 481,897 484,183 17%
Removal not Possible 20,424 20,318 20,752 21,555 21,753 22,260 22,392 23,137 23,893 25,343 25,692 25,899 26,764 27,560 35%
Wanted 30,488 31,276 31,385 31,642 31,944 32,224 32,439 32,790 32,764 33,162 33,371 33,501 33,458 33,511 10%
Removal in Progress 30,372 30,446 31,305 30,861 30,795 30,729 30,675 30,357 30,360 29,540 30,020 30,356 29,625 29,000 minus5%
Total 494,351 502,101 507,801 516,007 522,724 528,005 535,487 542,948 549,020 556,313 562,092 567,407 571,744 574,254 16%
Data as of
  • The Removal in Progress inventory has remained relatively stable, fluctuating by up to 5% per month and decreasing overall by 5% over the last 12 months due to increased efforts on removals since
  • The CBSA prioritizes removals based on a risk management regime that assigns the highest priority to cases involving security, organized crime, crimes against humanity, and criminality. These are followed by failed refugee claimants as second tier, and all other inadmissible persons as the lowest priority
  • In 2025, the CBSA removed an average of 443 individuals per week, including administrative removals, while over 600 new cases entered the inventory per week

Removals caseload with serious inadmissibility by year

Table 3: Removals caseload with criminality
  Serious Inads.
-
Overall Change
(2024-2026)
  Total Total Total Serious Inads. Other Inads. Serious % Total Serious Inads. Other Inads. Serious % Total Serious Inads. Other Inads. Serious %
Not yet Actionable 126,755 155,514 277,549 1,021 276,528 0.4% 420,061 1,123 418,938 0.3% 484,183 1,336 482,847 0.3% 23.6%
Removal not Possible 15,936 20,038 21,066 2,876 18,190 13.7% 20,318 3,065 17,253 15.1% 27,560 3,146 24,414 11.4% 8.6%
Wanted 28,995 29,295 29,248 867 28,381 3.0% 31,276 885 30,391 2.8% 33,511 957 32,554 2.9% 9.4%
Removal in Progress 19,806 19,012 21,061 1,255 19,806 6.0% 30,446 1,448 28,998 4.8% 29,000 1,623 27,377 5.6% 22.7%
Total 191,492 223,859 348,924 6,019 342,905 1.7% 502,101 6,521 495,580 1.3% 574,254 7,062 567,192 1.2% 14.8%
Data as of
  • Since 2024, the total number of cases involving a serious inadmissibility has increased by 9.4% for the Wanted inventory, although the rate of serious inadmissibilities has remained steady at 3% of the Wanted caseload
  • The number of serious inadmissibility cases increased by 23% for Removal in Progress inventory, but the rate dropped from 6.0% to 5.6%
  • The overall rate of serious inadmissibilities within the entire removal inventory has slightly decreased from 1.7% in 2024 to 1.2% in 2026
  • Serious inadmissibilities include:
    • s. 34 – national security; terrorism; espionage
    • s. 35 – human and international rights violations
    • s. 36 – criminality, including in-Canada or outside-Canada serious and non-serious criminality
    • s. 37 – organised crime

Removals inventory with serious inadmissibility by month

Table 4: Removals caseload with serious inadmissibility – 12 months
    Change (Feb - Feb)
Not yet Actionable Total 420,061 424,359 431,949 438,232 442,792 449,981 456,664 462,003 468,268 473,009 477,651 481,897 484,183 15%
Serious inads. 1,123 1,108 1,135 1,158 1,164 1,204 1,224 1,267 1,280 1,282 1,313 1,325 1,336 19%
Other inads. 418,938 423,251 430,814 437,074 441,628 448,777 455,440 460,736 466,988 471,727 476,338 480,572 482,847  
% Serious 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%  
Removal not Possible Total 20,318 20,752 21,555 21,753 22,260 22,392 23,137 23,893 25,343 25,692 25,899 26,764 27,560 36%
Serious inads. 3,065 3,042 3,084 3,085 3,114 3,139 3,139 3,133 3,173 3,174 3,199 3,166 3,146 3%
Other inads. 17,652 18,108 18,878 19,075 19,557 19,667 20,408 21,171 22,588 22,941 23,132 24,030 24,838  
% Serious 15.1% 14.7% 14.3% 14.2% 14.0% 14.0% 13.6% 13.1% 12.5% 12.4% 12.4% 11.8% 11.4%  
Wanted Total 31,276 31,385 31,642 31,944 32,224 32,439 32,790 32,764 33,162 33,371 33,501 33,458 33,511 7%
Serious inads. 885 889 884 888 899 914 926 930 932 933 929 933 957 8%
Other inads. 30,391 30,496 30,758 31,056 31,325 31,525 31,864 31,834 32,230 32,438 32,572 32,525 32,554  
% Serious 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.9%  
Removal in Progress Total 30,446 31,305 30,861 30,795 30,729 30,675 30,357 30,360 29,540 30,020 30,356 29,625 29,000 minus5%
Serious inads. 3,218 3,291 3,286 3,278 3,279 3,291 3,358 3,389 3,403 3,435 3,428 3,489 3,537 10%
Other inads. 27,228 28,014 27,575 27,517 27,450 27,384 26,999 26,971 26,137 26,585 26,928 26,136 25,463  
% Serious 10.6% 10.5% 10.6% 10.6% 10.7% 10.7% 11.1% 11.2% 11.5% 11.4% 11.3% 11.8% 12.2%  
Total Total 502,101 507,801 516,007 522,724 528,005 535,487 542,948 549,020 556,313 562,092 567,407 571,744 574,254 14%
Serious inads. 6,521 6,552 6,621 6,633 6,658 6,720 6,795 6,859 6,924 6,958 7,011 7,047 7,062 8%
Other inads. 495,580 501,249 509,386 516,091 521,347 528,767 536,153 542,161 549,389 555,134 560,396 564,697 567,192  
% Serious 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2%  
Data as of
  • About 3% of the Wanted inventory cases involved a serious inadmissibility consistently over the last 12 months
  • For the Removal in Progress, the percentage of cases involving a serious inadmissibility has slowly risen over the past year, reaching 12.2% in
  • Foreign nationals still serving a criminal sentence or with pending criminal charges cannot be removed until the criminal matters are resolved. These cases are subject to a legislated stay of removal and are found in the Removal Not Possible inventory, leading to its significantly higher proportion of cases with criminality. CBSA may issue a warrant for arrest to ensure that CBSA is notified following the completion of their criminal custody

[Redacted]

[Redacted]

Administrative deferrals of removal and temporary suspensions of removal

Table 6: Top countries under ADR/TSR in Removal not Possible inventory
Country Inventory cases
Haiti 7,399
Democratic Republic of the Congo 2,653
Venezuela 1,157
Democratic Republic of Somalia 913
Afghanistan 592
Iraq 354
Iran 221
Republic of Mali 214
Syria 157
Libya 88
Remaining 325
Total 14,071

As of

  • An Administrative Deferral of Removal is a temporary measure imposed by the CBSA to defer removals when country conditions exist that could seriously endanger the lives or safety of the entire civilian population. It is not meant to address persistent and systemic human rights problems which constitute individual risk. CBSA monitors global events and provides assessments and recommendations to the delegated decision maker, the Director General of Inland Enforcement, on where and when, to impose or lift ADRs
    • There is currently an active ADR in place for certain regions in Somalia (Middle Shabelle, Afgoye, and Mogadishu), the Gaza Strip, Ukraine, Syria, Mali, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Libya, Yemen, Venezuela, Haiti, Iran, Sudan, Israel, and Lebanon
  • A Temporary suspension of Removals is imposed by the Minister of Public Safety and interrupts removals to a country, when country conditions exist that could seriously endanger the lives or safety of the entire civilian population. It is not meant to address persistent and systemic human rights problems which constitute individual risk
    • There are active TSR for in place for Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Iraq
  • Individuals who benefit from an ADR or a TSR are located in the Removal Not Possible inventory. Individuals who have failed to comply with a reporting condition may be captured in the wanted inventory until they are located. Individuals inadmissible for safety or security concerns do not benefit from the ADR or TSR and will be located in the removal in progress inventory or wanted inventory depending on the specific details of their case
  • Individuals with serious inadmissibility such as national security and criminality do not benefit from a stay of removals under these provisions
  • There are just over 14,000 ADR/TSR cases in the inventory, 98% of which are for the top ten countries

Removals enforced

Table 7: Removals enforced by month
  2025 Total
Removals completed 1,657 1,878 2,124 1,982 1,712 1,725 2,514 2,419 1,725 1,647 2,051 1,613 23,047 2,600 1,170
With a serious inadmissibility 103 74 91 114 91 119 105 90 107 97 99 91 1,181 94 102
Other inadmissibility 1,554 1,804 2,033 1,868 1,621 1,606 2,409 2,329 1,618 1,550 1,952 1,522 21,866 2,506 1,068
Serious inadmissibility % 6% 4% 4% 6% 5% 7% 4% 4% 6% 6% 5% 6% 5% 4% 9%

Data extracted on ; is the most recent complete month for which data is available.

  • In 2025, CBSA removed over 23,000 inadmissible foreign nationals, of which 1,181 (or 5%) involved a serious inadmissibility
  • The Border Plan provided $55.5 million to support immigration and asylum processing and to increase CBSA's capacity to reach 20,000 removals for fiscal years 2025-2026 and 2026-2027
  • The CBSA is on pace to exceed the target for fiscal years 2025-2026
Table 8: Removals enforced by year
  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1 Total
Removals completed 12,854 7,514 8,330 15,224 17,389 23,047 4,356 88,714
With a serious inadmissibility 632 526 599 718 906 1,181 246 4,808
Other inadmissibility 12,222 6,988 7,731 14,506 16,483 21,866 4,110 83,906
Serious inadmissibility % 5% 7% 7% 5% 5% 5% 6% 5%
  • The 23,047 removals completed in 2025 are higher than any of the past five years
  • Of these, approximately 5% involved a serious inadmissibility

Escorted removals

Table 9: Escorted removals by month
  2025 Total
Removals completed 112 108 115 191 105 155 249 187 130 93 94 94 1,633 83 85

Year to date up to ; Includes escorted removals for international destinations and at land ports on entry.

Table 10: Escorted removals by year
  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1
Removals completed 422 590 836 1,402 1,180 1,633 212
  • CBSA officers assess the risk of each case being removed and, for higher risk cases, recommend that escort officers accompany the foreign national to their destination to ensure the safety and security of the public, aircraft, and the foreign national themselves. Escort officers may also be deemed necessary by the airline, or to accompany a medical professional for foreign nationals with complex medical needs
  • In 2025, CBSA conducted over 1,600 escorted removals, representing approximately 7% of the total removals, and the highest volume in six years
  • On average, an unescorted removal costs $3,700, while an escorted removal costs around $12,500. In fiscal year 2024–25, the CBSA spent over $17.5 million on removal-related travel costs
Table 11: Top escorted removals destinations 2025
Country % of Total escorted
United States of America 55%
India 8%
Romania 3%
Mexico 3%
Nigeria 2%
Philippines 2%
Jamaica 2%
England 1%
Colombia 1%
France 1%
  • The U.S. accounted for 55% of the total escorts in 2025; over 90% of these occurred at land POEs
  • The top ten destination countries account for approximately 80% of total escorted removals

Iranian Regime

On , the Minister of Public Safety first designated the Iranian regime under paragraph 35(1)(b) of the IRPA from onwards. In , the Minister of Public Safety amended the start date of the designation from to . The designation makes any foreign national or permanent resident who were or are prescribed senior officials in the regime inadmissible to Canada.

As of , under the designation of the Iranian regime:

  • approximately 17,800 applications were reviewed for potential inadmissibility
  • 239 visas have been cancelled by IRCC
  • 176 investigations have been opened by the CBSA
    • Additional investigations will be opened as new information becomes available
  • 86 investigations have been concluded by the CBSA, which means that the individuals in question were either not in Canada, or determined not to be a senior official in the Iranian regime and therefore not inadmissible for this reason
    • The remaining cases are subject to ongoing investigations or enforcement action
  • 34 persons have been reported inadmissible by the CBSA for being a senior official in the Iranian regime
  • 26 cases involving individuals in Canada have been or will be sent to the Immigration Division (ID) of the IRB for an admissibility hearing
    • 6 referrals were withdrawn by the CBSA before the case proceeded any further
  • The CBSA has requested the scheduling of 20 of these cases, while the rest continue to undergo preparations prior to being sent for scheduling. Of these 20 cases:
    • 9 admissibility hearings have been concluded, resulting in decisions by the ID:
      • 3 individuals were found inadmissible for being prescribed senior officials and issued deportation orders; 1 has been removed from Canada
      • 6 individuals were found not inadmissible by the ID; CBSA has filed their appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) in 5 of these cases
      • In 2 of these cases, the appeal was dismissed by the IAD. The CBSA has filed an application for leave and judicial review for both of these decisions; one remains ongoing and one was discontinued.
    • 1 case has been subsequently withdrawn by the CBSA
    • 10 cases are ongoing

Extortion

File Inventory (as of ) Totals
Total # of open/active CBSA investigationsTablenote 1, Tablenote 2 372
Total # of removal orders issued (various inadmissibility grounds) 70
Total # of Completed Removals 35

Financials

  • $78.3 million spent on Removals in fiscal year 2024-2025 to achieve 18,126 removals
  • Nearly 63% of the total expenditure was for Salary ($49.6 million), and another 27% was spent on Operations & Maintenance (O&M)
  • The remaining 10%, (in other words, Other category), is comprised primarily of contributions to employee benefit plans ($7.4 million) (in other words, corporate requirements), and funding for items such as parental and maternity leave, and entitlements upon cessation of service ($340,000)
  • Regional operations accounted for over 80% of the total budget for conducting removals—86% of the total salary, and 98% of the total O&M
  • Operational expenses include the salary costs required for removal interviews and arrangements, and O&M costs such as travel expenses for officers and the individuals being removed
  • $3,700 is the average cost of an unescorted removal and $12,500 for an escorted removal costs
  • An escorted removal is required primarily when an individual poses a public safety risk, is considered a significant flight risk, or if it is a requirement imposed by the airline or a transit country
  • Individuals being removed from Canada are required to pay for their own travel costs. In situations where the inadmissible person is unable or unwilling to pay, the CBSA covers the cost to ensure that they are removed in a timely manner. Costs are recovered by the Government of Canada when an individual who was removed at the government's expense seeks to return to Canada. Under the new cost recovery framework (effective ), the fees have been adjusted from approximately $1,500 previously to just over $12,800 for escorted removals and just over $3,800 for unescorted removals, regardless of destination. This change established a cost recovery framework that is more in line with the current costs of removals and encourages voluntary compliance with removal orders
  • Approximately $6 million was spent within IEB in NHQ for stakeholder engagement activities (in other words, securing travel documents for removal), program and operational guidance to the field, performance management and reporting, and corporate support costs. An additional $1 million was allocated to enabling branches ($800,000 for SPB and $200,000 for ISTB)
Fiscal year 2024-2025 breakdown (in dollars $)
Salary Operating-Non-Salary OtherTablenote 1 Total
IEB 5,748,535 330,758 16,298 6,095,591
NHQ Other (ISTB, SPB) 956,132 71,366 18,032 1,045,530
Corporate Requirement 51,268 0 7,417,469 7,468,737
Regions 42,845,749 20,469,750 325,123 63,640,622
Total 49,601,684 20,871,873 7,776,922 78,250,479
  • Over $18.1 million spent in fiscal year 2024-2025 (87% of the total O&M expenditure) was spent on travel. This includes travel costs for escort officers (approximately $10 million), such as airline tickets and accommodation
  • An additional $7.5 million was spent on airline tickets and associated travel expenses for individuals being removed who are unable or unwilling to pay the costs (Travel Expense for Individuals Being Removed in the table below); this can also include accommodations, food, clothing, onward transportation in the destination country, subsistence funding, and incidental costs
  • In fiscal year 2024-2025, the CBSA completed 18,126 removals, including 718 escorted removals
  • $612,000 spent on various professional services including building protection, $545,000 on translation and interpretation, and $360,000 on health and welfare for services such as nurse escorts and medical assessments for individuals removed from Canada
  • The Other O&M category includes small amounts (under $300,000) for items such as purchasing of equipment, supplies and hardware/software; training; postage; and IT and maintenance services
Fiscal year 2024-2025 O&M breakdown (in dollars $)
Expenditure Category Operating-Non-Salary
Escort Travel 10,020,810
Travel Expense for Individuals Being Removed 7,544,184
Prof Service (Non IT) 612,483
Translation and Interpretation 544,981
Other Travel 545,901
Health and Welfare Services 359,590
Other O&M 1,243,448
Total 20,871,873

Expenditure Trends

  • 55% increase in removals expenditures and 141% increase in removals volume from fiscal year 2021-2022 to fiscal year 2024-2025
  • In past years, the removal budget has been bolstered through additional funding sources supporting government priories, primarily Asylum and Irregular Migration funding for additional removals resulting from increased asylum claim processing
  • Pay rate increases partially contributed to increased costs (FB3 salary increased by nearly 16% from to )
  • The Other category includes contributions to employee benefit plans (over 95%) and funding for items such as parental and maternity leave and entitlements upon cessation of service (less than 5%)
Fiscal year comparison
Fiscal year Salary Operating-Non-Salary Other Total Removals Completed Escorted Removals (Inland removals only)
2021-2022 33,145,933 12,267,374 4,861,218 50,274,525 7,532 489
2022-2023 35,468,520 14,951,988 5,628,945 56,049,453 10,248 607
2023-2024 39,110,311 20,560,189 6,110,714 65,781,214 16,357 656
2024-2025 49,601,684 20,871,873 7,776,922 78,250,480 18,126 718

Iran

Question Period Note – CBSA –

Key messages

  • Let me be clear, CBSA officers are investigating Iranian foreign nationals who are in Canada and who served in the IRGC or were senior members of the regime
  • They are bringing those people before the Immigration and Refugee Board and making the case against them

If Pressed

Q1 – On the 700 put forward by StopIRGC:

  • This number is not true
  • A couple years ago, a group of lawyers made this claim and CBSA followed up directly with them
  • Only a few names were provided and the CBSA has followed up on all of them
  • We encourage the public to send any names to the Border Watch Line

Background

Issue: Ongoing concerns about individuals linked to the Iranian regime (IRGC) entering Canada without issue.

Information to support Key Messages

The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) works in an operating environment that changes on a daily basis and we are ready to respond and adapt as needed. Our strong response to suspected senior officials in the Iranian regime remains in place and the CBSA continues to take action to stop them from seeking or finding safe haven in Canada.

The CBSA takes its border protection responsibilities very seriously and works closely with domestic and international partners by regularly sharing relevant information on border and national security issues. This includes our support to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) which makes decisions on citizenship and immigration applications, including visas. Iranian nationals must apply for a visa to come to Canada and visa applicants are carefully assessed by IRCC. For more information on visa issuance please contact IRCC directly.

In , Canada designated the leadership of the Iranian government – including senior officials of the government, security, and intelligence agencies – as inadmissible to Canada for their engagement in terrorism and systemic and gross human rights violations. This designation, which was expanded in , is pursued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). It is a broadly applied mechanism aimed at ensuring that senior government officials who served from onward do not benefit from access to Canada. Additionally, it enables the CBSA to take immigration enforcement action against any regime member who may have already been in Canada prior to or since the designation. Members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) are also inadmissible to Canada under an additional provision of the IRPA. Under the designation, visas have been cancelled, investigations launched, and admissibility hearings completed.

Additionally, Canada has taken domestic legislative action to criminalize support to terrorist entities, including those who are supported by Iran. In 2024, Canada listed the IRGC as a terrorist entity under the Criminal Code, in response to its terrorist acts both on its own and in knowing association with listed terrorist entities, such as Hizballah and Hamas. Canada remains gravely concerned by the Islamic Republic of Iran's actions and condemns their efforts to further destabilize peace and security across the Middle East. The Criminal Code terrorist listing regime is an important tool for countering terrorism in Canada and globally, and listing the IRGC reflects the government's commitment to keep people in Canada safe.

When the CBSA becomes aware of cases where a temporary or permanent resident inside Canada may be inadmissible as a senior official of the Iranian regime, the CBSA completes a thorough investigation. If after investigation the concern is well-founded, the CBSA will report the individual and refer the case to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) as the decision-maker in these types of cases. If the IRB determines at the end of a hearing that the person is inadmissible, they will issue a removal order against them and the CBSA will then work to enforce their removal from Canada.

There are a number of factors that affect the ability to remove a person from Canada, including availability of subsequent applications that they can make, such as pre-removal risk assessment applications, and all persons are afforded due process against any decision made against them which can include seeking judicial review of those decisions. The CBSA only actions a removal order once a person has waived or exhausted all legal avenues of recourse that can stay the removal.

Regime

The CBSA is investigating Iranians who are in Canada and who were senior officials of the regime, and bringing them before the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) to make a case against them.

Removal can proceed because these officials are inadmissible on the ground of human or international rights violations.

The CBSA's Border Watch Line is available for organizations and the public to submit tips on suspected regime members.

Approx. 450 tips were received by the CBSA Since the original designation of the Iranian regime in .

As of , under the designation of the Iranian regime:

  • approximately 17,800 applications were reviewed for potential inadmissibility
  • 239 visas have been cancelled by IRCC
  • 176 investigations have been opened by the CBSA
    • Additional investigations will be opened as new information becomes available
  • 86 investigations have been concluded by the CBSA, which means that the individuals in question were either not in Canada or determined not to be a senior official in the Iranian regime and therefore not inadmissible for this reason
    • The remaining cases are subject to ongoing investigations or enforcement action
  • 34 persons have been reported inadmissible by the CBSA for being a senior official in the Iranian regime
    • 26 cases involving individuals in Canada have been or will be sent to the Immigration Division (ID) of the IRB for an admissibility hearing
      • 6 referrals were withdrawn by the CBSA before the case proceeded any furtherFootnote 2
    • The CBSA has requested the scheduling of 20 of these cases, while the rest continue to undergo preparations prior to being sent for scheduling. Of these 20 cases:
      • 9 admissibility hearings have been concluded, resulting in decisions by the ID:
        • 3 individuals were found inadmissible for being prescribed senior officials and issued deportation orders. 1 has been removed from Canada
        • 6 individuals were found not inadmissible by the ID; CBSA has filed their appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) in 5 of these cases
          • In 2 of these cases, the appeal was dismissed by the IAD. The CBSA has filed an application for leave and judicial review for both of these decisions; one remains ongoing and one was discontinued.
      • 1 case has been subsequently withdrawn by the CBSAFootnote 2
      • 10 cases are ongoing

IRGC

On , the Minister of Public Safety listed the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist entity under the Criminal Code.

Military service in Iran is mandatory (conscription); for some, service in the IRGC was compulsory.

The CBSA is investigating Iranians who are in Canada and who may have been members of the IRGC.

Where the CBSA suspects someone was a member of the IRGC, they prepare a case and present it to the IRB, the decision maker.

Since the listing of the IRGC, the CBSA has identified 37 suspected members of the IRGC:

  • 7 left Canada before facing an admissibility hearing
  • 23 are being prepared for an IRB hearing
  • 7 are with the IRB for a hearing

Asylum seekers

How many asylum seekers have come to Canada through ports of entry in 2025?

  • Asylum claims in air mode: 11,747
  • Asylum claims in land mode: 21,462
  • Asylum claims between the Ports of Entry (based on people brought to CBSA by PoJ): 1,840
    • This figure is included in the Asylum Claims in land mode
  • This represents a 43% decrease in overall claims since last year (2024)
  • The highest number of claims were at the Lacolle Port of Entry in Quebec, with 15,333 claimants (an increase of 186% over last year – 5,360 claims in 2024)

All data is as of

Claims over last 5 calendar years (CBSA only)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Claimants 13,052 64,551 72,089 59,401 34,015

CBSA Land Border Refugee Claims: 2020-2026

Claimant type 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Tablenote 1 Grand total
Regular 2,473 5,251 7,554 15,783 14,734 19,622 5,957 71,374
Irregular 3,288 4,029 39,251 14,693 1,179 1,840 289 64,569
Grand total 5,761 9,280 46,805 30,476 15,913 21,462 6,246 135,943

IRCC Inland Refugee Claims: 2020-2026Tablenote 2

Claimant type 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Grand totalTablenote 1
Inland 15,790 12,060 27,654 71,354 113,589 80,492 19,275 340,214

In 2020-2021, land border refugee claims low numbers were a direct reflection of the impacts of the Covid Pandemic.

  • In 2022 and the early part of 2023, as Covid restrictions eased the number of land border claims increased sharply
    • A significant number of these claims were irregular claims between the Ports of Entry
  • With the implementation of the STCA-AP on the number of irregular claims were greatly reduced
    • However, regular claims began increasing after the STCA-AP implementation
  • Since its implementation, regular Claims have been around approximately the 15,000 per annum
    • However, in 2025 the number increased to almost 20,000 claims
      • This was mostly due to two periods of increased claims due to an influx of Haitian Nationals specifically at the Saint-Bernard-de Lacolle POE in Quebec
        • The influx can be attributed to the expiration of the Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela Parole program in the United States announced on
        • Additional announcements from the United States regarding the pending termination of Temporary Protected Status designations for specific nationalities such as Haiti, Somalia, Honduras, Nicaragua, Ethiopia, Venezuela, South Sudan, Nepal and Burma have increased the potential for asylum claims at Canadian land POE's

Bill C-12 (Strengthening Canada's Immigration System and Borders Act) Updates:

  • Received Royal Assent on
    • Part 8, amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) to introduce two new ineligibility provisions
    • New Ineligibility provisions:
      • A101(1)(b.1) The person entered Canada after and waited more than 12 months to make a refugee claim
      • A101(1)(b.2) The person entered Canada from the United States between ports of entry and made their refugee claim 14 days or more after that entry
    • Application and Transitional Provisions
      • The new ineligibility provisions apply only to claims made on or after
      • Claims made prior to that date are not subject to the new ineligibility provision
    • Claims found ineligible under the new provisions are not referred to the IRB
    • Claimants who are ineligible may apply for a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA)
    • CBSA will continue to monitor any impact on CBSA volumes resulting from the coming into force of the new ineligibilities
    • Between and , about 32,300 claims have been flagged for redetermination ( out of 84,200 total claims), of which CBSA is expected to redetermine approximately 1.6k claims

1,000 officers

1,000 Officers Funding Profile (in millions of dollars)
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Ongoing
Vote 1 Personnel 1.8 43.7 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
  Other Operating 1.3 27.6 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
Vote 5 Capital 0.1 5.7 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
Total CBSA 3.1 77.0 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
  EBP 0.5 11.8 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
  SSC 0.1 1.7 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
  PSPC 0.0 0.5 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
Total other 0.6 14.0 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
Total funding 3.7 91.0 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]

Hiring of 1,000 new CBSA Officers

  • As of , the CBSA has hired 106 new CBSA officers, of the 1,000
    • This includes 76 Border Services Officers (BSO) (including 3 fentanyl dog teams), 21 Trade Officers, 3 Recourse Officers, 4 Chemists and 2 Detection Technology Engineers
  • By July, CBSA will have hired approximately 140 officers and will have approximately 200 in training at the college in Rigaud
  • A new cohort of BSO trainees will start at the College every 5 weeks until we deliver on our commitment to hire 1,000 new officers by 2028-29 (see Annex 1). A cohort may include up to 72 BSO trainees.
  • A portion of the officer trainees in each cohort will be dedicated to fulfilling the commitment to hire 1,000 new officers, while the others will be used to account for the attrition (retirement, departures) of existing officers.
Annex 1: Total Hiring of New BSO and Other Officers, Per Year and by Function
Function 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 Ongoing
Commercial Operations 36 186 292 219 733
Traveller Operations 0 60 0 0 60
Sub total BSOs 36 246 292 219 793
Trade Operations 16 38 22 8 84
Recourse 0 11 0 0 11
Intelligence Operations 0 7 7 0 14
Targeting 0 18 3 0 21
Criminal Investigations 0 9 13 0 22
Inland Enforcement 0 10 10 0 20
National security screening 0 13 0 0 13
International 0 3 0 0 3
Science, Engineering & Technology 6 13 0 0 19
Sub total other officers 22 122 55 8 207
Total new officers per year 58 368 347 227 1000
Total cumulative new officers 58 426 773 1000  
Total cumulative new officers (%) 6% 43% 77% 100%  

Please Note: "Other functions" include International Liaison Officers, Recourse Officers, Chemists and Engineers.

Overview of BSO training

1. Officer Trainee Entrance Exam (OTEE)

The candidate must pass an online exam that assesses their reasoning skills, writing skills, analytical thinking and client orientation. They will have 135 minutes to complete 117 multiple-choice questions where 60% correct in each competency is required to be successful. If they have passed the OTEE in a previous selection process, they do not need to retake the exam.

2. Interview

If successful at the OTEE, the candidate will attend an MS Teams video interview that consists of situational questions and role-playing scenarios. Previous knowledge of the CBSA is not required. Proof of a valid full driver's license without restrictions will be requested and verified prior to the interview.

  • Candidates are assessed on the competencies below and must demonstrate each of these to the level required in the assessment to be considered successful
    • dealing with difficult situations
    • decisiveness
    • effective interactive communication
    • judgment
    • personal integrity
    • values and ethics

3. Validation of Prerequisites

If successful at the interview, the candidate will be required to provide proof of the following before they can complete the psychological assessment (MMPI):

  • Canadian citizenship or permanent residency
  • High school diploma or employer-approved alternative (note: the CBSA does not consider an acceptable combination of education, training, and/or experience as an alternative. The NORP is currently using the General Competency Test: Level 1 (GCT1-207) as the PSC approved testing equivalent)

4. Psychological Assessment (MMPI)

A psychologist will evaluate the candidate's ability to handle stress and suitability to carry a duty firearm.

  • The MMPI will consist of two parts on separate days
    • First, a written exam (2-4 hours total)
    • followed by an in-person interview

If deemed unsuitable, the candidate is removed from the selection process. Only a determination of "suitable" or "not suitable" will be provided. A signed consent form before the assessment explains that beyond this result, no feedback, test scores, or other information can be provided.

5. Physical Abilities Test (PAT)

The PAT replaces the Physical Abilities Requirement Evaluation (PARE) from previous selection processes and is performed during the Officer Induction Training Program (OITP) in-residence training. It is not a pass or fail exercise, but rather an evaluation of your level of fitness. If you fall below the minimum standards of the test, your risk of failure or injury in the program increases.
Candidates will be invited to a mandatory PAT information session once they have been found suitable at the psychological assessment.

6. Firearms Safety Courses

To ensure candidates can safely handle a firearm during training and on the job, they must complete the Canadian Firearms Safety Course (CFSC) and the Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course (CRFSC).

Once the candidate reaches this step in the selection process, they are given 3 months to complete both courses. Failure to do so may result in their removal from the selection process.
Although a Possession and Acquisition License (PAL) is not required, it is accepted as proof that both courses have been completed.

7. Medical Exam (Category III)

Candidates will receive an invitation from CBSA with a form to complete which will be provided to Health Canada (HC). HC will then contact the candidate directly to schedule the appointment to determine if the candidate is medically fit to train and work as a Border Services Officer (BSO) through the completion of a confidential health questionnaire and medical exam by a doctor.

8. Second Language Evaluations (SLE)

If the candidate applied for a bilingual position (English and French only), they must complete the SLEs and achieve the intermediate level (BBB).
The CBSA only accepts results for SLEs administered by the PSC.

9. Security Clearance

Candidates need an Enhanced Secret Clearance to train and work as a BSO. CBSA Security relies on external partners to complete the security screening.
The CBSA will email the candidate results after they complete the telephone integrity interview.
All candidates must go through this process, even if they have security clearance from another government department or law enforcement agency.

If the candidate is successful at the CBSA Officer trainee selection process, they are placed in our pre-qualified pool of OITP ready candidates and can be invited to an upcoming cohort.

10. OITP

10.1 OITP Stipend

Recruits are not paid a salary during OITP, but will receive a weekly tax-free allowance of $525 per week for the entire duration of training and paid accommodations and meals during Phase 2 of OITP (see below for more details).

10.2 OITP Phase 1 – Online Training

When candidates are selected for OITP, they will receive an invitation and will be assigned to their work location/ports of entry (PoE). While the CBSA does their best to post candidates in their preferred region, they may be posted elsewhere based on PoE staffing vacancies and the Agency's needs.
Note: when candidates apply to become a BSO, they agree to accept a posting anywhere in Canada, including small, remote, and rural PoE as a condition of employment.

  • The month waiting  period to be invited to participate at OITP is dependent on cohort availability and seat allocation
  • Invitations are sent approximately 5 weeks before Phase 1 starts

They will complete four weeks of online training at home. Which is a mix of self-learning and instructor-led video sessions. It includes quizzes, activities, assignments, collaborative discussions, and forum postings.

10.3 OITP Phase 2 – Canada Border Services College

The recruit will then complete 14 weeks of training at the Canada Border Services College in Rigaud, Quebec.

They will learn about:

  • the primary inspection process
  • the secondary inspection process
  • customs
  • immigration
  • food, plant and animal
  • commercial operations
  • policies, procedures and laws that we administer and enforce
  • seizures, detentions, personal searches and arrests
  • how to determine the admissibility of persons and goods
  • defensive tactics
  • duty firearms

If recruits are successful in the OITP, they will proceed to the Officer Induction Developmental (OID) Program.

11. OID Program

On the day prior to the CBSA Induction Ceremony, recruits will receive a letter of offer for the FB-02 CBSA Officer Trainee (developmental) position. The letter of offer will include their start date at their assigned Port of Entry (PoE). They will start working at their assigned PoE approximately two (2) weeks after they graduate.

During the OID Program, they will work as CBSA Officer Trainees (FB-02) and will be paid a starting salary of $80,344. The duration of the OID Program is a minimum of 12 and a maximum of 18 cumulative months. The OID Program is a performance and competency-based program which includes a standardized framework of learning, coaching, constructive feedback and practical on-the-job application; which provides a clear developmental and career progression path for participants. If they successfully complete the OID Program, Officer Trainees will be recommended for an indeterminate FB-03 Border Services Officer (BSO) position which has a starting salary of $86,915.

Overview of BSO recruitment process

Figure 1
Figure 1 - Text version

Journey to the frontline

Here's what the Officer Trainee Development Program selection process looks like, including wait times for receiving assessment results
The order of some assessments arranged by the CBSA may slightly vary.
Selection process duration approx. 12 to 18 months (Stages 1 to 9)

Stages:

  1. Officer Trainee Entrance Exam (OTEE)
  2. Interview
  3. Validation of Prerequisites
  4. Psychological Assessment (MMPI)
  5. Physical Abilities Test (PAT) information Session
  6. Firearms Safety Courses Results: vary by provider
  7. Medical Exam (Category III)
  8. Second Language Evaluations (SLE)
  9. Security Clearance
  10. Officer Induction Training Program (OTIP)
    • Recruit – No salary, weekly allowance plus paid accommodations and meals
      • Online Training – 4 weeks
      • Canada Border Service College – 14 weeks
  11. Officer Induction Development Program (OID Program)
    1. Unpaid - OITP graduation to OID Program – 2 weeks
    2. FB-02 Officer Trainee Salary - Development at port of entry – Approx. 12 to 18 months
  12. Graduate - FB-03 BSO Salary

Border Plan

Border Plan funding profile (in millions of dollars)
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
Vote 1 Personnel 8.3 14.2 26.9 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
  Other Operating 2.0 13.9 22.3 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
Vote 5 Capital - - 33.5 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
Total CBSA 10.3 28.1 82.7 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
  EBP 2.2 3.8 7.3 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
  SSC 0.3 0.6 1.1 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
  PSPC 0.3 0.4 0.8 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
Total other 2.9 4.8 9.2 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
Total funding 13.2 32.9 91.8 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]

What is the status of implementation of the border plan?

  • We have hired 30 Enforcement Case Officers to support removals
  • The Border Action Plan includes 75 frontline resources:
    • 33 frontline Border Services Officers (BSOs)
    • 3 Detector Dog Services teams
    • 12 regional laboratory Chemists
    • 7 Intelligence Officers
    • 7 Criminal Investigators
    • 6 Targeting Officers
    • 7 Engineers
  • 33 Border Services Officers began their in-house training at the CBSA College in Rigaud on . Twenty-four of these Border Services Officers completed and graduated in and five Border Services Officers graduated in ; 4 backfills are being re-trained currently and are anticipated to be fully retrained by mid-October 2026.
  • The 3 dog handlers graduated on
  • 2 Engineers were hired in 2025-2026 and are currently supporting operations. The other 3 Engineers, for a total of 5, will be hired this fiscal year
  • There are also 2 engineering support personnel (1 for electronics and 1 for engineering and scientific support) that will be hired this fiscal
  • 4 Chemists were hired in 2025-2026 and are currently supporting operations. The other 8 Chemists, for a total of 12, will be hired this fiscal year
  • The remaining frontline resources will be deployed in future years as follows:
    • 2026–2027:
      • 7 Intelligence Officers
      • 7 Criminal Investigators
      • 6 Targeting Officers
    • 2027–2028:
      • 3 Detector Dog Handlers
    • 2028–2029:
      • 3 Detector Dog Handlers

Investment Plan

The investment plan has five pillars for specific action

The five Pillars investment plan
Border Plan Pillars CBSA Elements
Detecting and disrupting the illegal fentanyl trade Acquire new tools for the CBSA frontlines
Introducing significant new tools for law enforcement

Amending the Customs Act to obligate industry partners to provide access to adequate accommodation and spaces when required to allow for the examination of exported goods by CBSA officers, while ensuring greater consistency between import and export requirements more generally.

Implement a set of amendments to the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA), including increases to administrative and criminal penalties and other compliance tools.
These amendments will give CBSA new authorities and reporting requirements to combat trade-based financial crimes.

CBSA to finalize the Memorandum of Understanding with U.S. to enable the sharing of bulk trade data to detect and deter cross-border trade-based money laundering, and other crimes.

Improving operational coordination Launch of the Joint Operational Intelligence cell which includes CBSA.
Expanding information sharing Increase effective and efficient information sharing with the US by establishing new data repositories to enhance data collection and reporting.
Minimizing unnecessary border volumes
  • Eliminate "flagpoling" by temporary residents in Canada
  • Increase the rate of removals for inadmissible people
  • Continue to take action to end illegal southbound movements

All Border Action Plan commitments with respect to CTB

Exact quantities and technologies are subject to change pending evolving business needs and further analysis

  • In 2025–2026, the CBSA has deployed or is in the process of finalizing the deployment of:
    • 18 Raman devices
    • 3 Mobile Large-Scale Imaging devices
    • 2 Pallet Large-Scale Imaging device
    • 1 Fixed Large-Scale Imaging device
    • 1 Small-Scale Imaging X-ray
    • 33 Border Services Officers
  • In 2026–2027, the CBSA plans to initiate and/or deploy:
    • 30 Raman devices
    • 3 Regional Satellite Laboratories
    • 25 Ion Mobility Spectrometers
    • 6 Mobile Large-Scale Imaging devices
    • 2 Pallet Large-Scale Imaging devices
    • Up to 6 Mobile Backscatter Imaging devices
    • 10 Small-Scale Imaging X-rays
    • 9 Computed Tomography Scans
    • 13 Ducted Fume Hoods
    • 3 Detector Dog Services teams
    • 12 Chemists total (4 hired in 25/26)
    • 14 Intelligence resources
    • 6 Targeting Officers
  • In fiscal year 2027–2028, the CBSA plans to deploy:
    • 30 Raman devices
    • 25 Ion Mobility Spectrometers
    • 4 Computed Tomography Scans
    • 2 Pallet Large-Scale Imaging devices
    • 3 Detector Dog Services teams
  • In fiscal year 2028–2029, the CBSA plans to deploy:
    • 25 Raman devices
    • 3 Detector Dog Services teams

Planned Detection Technology deployments (all sources of funds) – multi-year table

Detection Technology acronym legend
  • RAMAN: Hand-Held Raman Device
  • RSL: Regional Satellite Labs
  • IMS: Ion Mobility Spectrometer
  • LSI*: Large Scale Imaging - Portal or Drive Thru
  • M-LSI: Mobile Large Scale Imaging
  • P-LSI: Pallet Large Scale Imaging
  • F-LSI: Fixed Large Scale Imaging
  • MBI: Mobile Backscatter Imaging
  • CT Scan: Computed Tomography Scanner
  • SSI X-ray: Small Scale Imaging (various types)
Fiscal year 2025–2026 – Commitment / Deployments / Procurements
  ATL QC NOR GTA SOR PRA PAC LAB Total
RAMAN 1 5 1 3 - 1 6 1 18
RSL - - - - - - - - 0
IMS - - - - - - - - 0
M-LSI 1 - - - 1 - 1 - 3
P-LSI 1 - - - - - 1 - 2
F-LSI - - - - 1 - - - 1
MBI - - - - - - - - 0
CT Scan - - - - - - - - 0
SSI Xray - - - - 1 - - - 1
Ducted fumehood - - - - - - - - 0
Total 3 5 1 3 3 1 8 1 25
Fiscal year 2026–2027 – Commitment / Deployments / Procurements
  ATL QC NOR GTA SOR PRA PAC LAB Total
RAMAN 2 3 2 6 5 6 4 2 30
RSL - 1 - 1 - 1 - - 3
IMS 2 4 2 3 2 1 5 6 25
M-LSI 1 2 - - 1 - 2 - 6
P-LSI - - - - 1 - 1 - 2
F-LSI - - - - - - - - 0
MBI* 1 1 - 1 - - 1 2xTBC 6
CT Scan* - 2 - 2 - 3 2 - 9
SSI Xray - 1 1 1 2 2 3 - 10
Ducted fumehood 2 2 - 2 2 1 4 - 13
Total 8 16 5 16 13 14 22 10 104

Exact locations and quantities are subject to change pending evolving business needs and further analysis

Fiscal year 2027–2028 – Commitment / Deployments / Procurements
  ATL QC NOR GTA SOR PRA PAC LAB Total
RAMAN 4 6 1 3 7 3 5 1 30
RSL - - - - - - - - 0
IMS Locations TBC 25 25
[Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
P-LSI - 1 - - - - 1 - 2
F-LSI - - - - - - - - 0
MBI - - 1 - 1 1 1 - 4
CT Scan - 1 - 1 - - 2 - 4
SSI Xray - - - - - - - - 0
Ducted fumehood - - - - - - - - 0
Total 4 7 2 3 8 4 11 29 68
Fiscal year 2028–2029 – Commitment / Deployments / Procurements
  ATL QC NOR GTA SOR PRA PAC LAB Total
RAMAN 4 4 4 2 3 5 2 1 25
RSL - - - - - - - - 0
IMS - - - - - - - - 0
[Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
P-LSI - - - - - - - - 0
F-LSI - - - - - - - - 0
MBI - - - - - - - - 0
CT Scan - - - - - - - - 0
SSI Xray - - - - - - - - 0
Ducted fumehood - - - - - - - - 0
Total 4 4 4 2 3 5 2 5 29
Fiscal year 2029–2030 – Commitment / Deployments
  ATL QC NOR GTA SOR PRA PAC LAB Total
[Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted]
SSI Xray 10 x SSI rolling out in 2026–2027 10
P-LSI 1 x Pallet to roll out in 2027–2028 1

[Redacted]

Implementation dashboard

RPP Enrollment –
Period Active Importers Active RPP Importers Currently Enrolled in RPP Enrollment (%) Historical C-Types Projected C-Types Historical EDI/RPP Release Rate Projected EDI/RPP Release Date (%)
WeeklyFootnote 2 41,130 39,774 37,254 96.66% 2,692 8,038 99.49% 98.49%
MonthlyFootnote 3 75,665 72,429 66,345 91.60% 12,147 28,459 99.49% 98.79%
AnnuallyFootnote 1 168,011 159,715 153,505 96.11% 130,360 146,909 99.59% 99.54%
RPP Enrollment Figures
27 – November
(1 week)
4 – December
(1 week)
12 – December
(~1 week)
2 – January
(~3 weeks)
6 – February
(~1 Month)
6 – March
(1 Month)
2 – April
(1 Month)
1 – May
(~1 Month)
1,508 1,245 1,560 2,735 5,820 4,816 4,785 4,815
RPP Enrollment –
April 2 to May 1 Enrollment (+ Enrollment New ImportersFootnote 1) Overall Enrollment
Category (Rel./Yr) Number of Clients Enrolled RPP Releases Enrolled since May 20th RPP Importers Enrolled Total RPP Importers Enrollment (%)
Very Small (1 – 10) 446 (+4,384) 668 (+5,232) 74,517 97,738 103,772 94.19%
Small (11 – 99) 2 (+10) 108 (+292) 15,254 40,196 40,359 99.60%
Med. (100 – 364) 0 0 2,014 9,978 9,989 99.89%
Large (365 – 4,999) 0 0 710 5,196 5,198 99.96%
XL (5,000+) 0 0 37 397 397 100.00%
Total 4,851 (448 + 4,403) 6,300 (776 + 5,524) 92,559 153,505 159,715 96.11%

Deployment timeline

2025-2026
Tool Status Units Region Funding source
Handheld Raman Anticipated to be completed this fiscal 15 Multi Fall Economic Statement
Pallet Large Scale Imaging Anticipated to leak into next fiscal, minimal risk (finances handled) 1 ATL Fall Economic Statement
Pallet Large Scale Imaging Anticipated to leak into next fiscal, minimal risk (finances handled) 1 PAC Restoring the Front Line
Mobile Large Scale Imaging Anticipated to leak into next fiscal, minimal risk (finances handled) 2 ATL/PAC Detection Technology Control Fund
Mobile Large Scale Imaging Anticipated to leak into next fiscal, minimal risk (finances handled) 1 SOR Restoring the Front Line
Fixed Large Scale ImagingFootnote 1 Anticipated to be completed this fiscal 1 SOR Gordie Howe International Bridge
Small Scale ImagingFootnote 1 Anticipated to be completed this fiscal 5 SOR Gordie Howe International Bridge
2026-2027
Tool Units Region Funding source
Ducted Fume Hoods 13 Multi Fall Economic Statement
Handheld Raman 25 All Fall Economic Statement
Handheld Raman 5 PAC Marine Container Exam Facility
Ion Mobility Spectrometer 25 All Fall Economic Statement
Mobile Backscatter ImagingFootnote 2 4 Multi Fall Economic Statement
Mobile Large Scale Imaging 3 Multi Fall Economic Statement
Mobile Large Scale Imaging 2 PAC Marine Container Exam Facility
Pallet Large Scale Imaging 1 PAC Marine Container Exam Facility
Regional Satellite Laboratories 3 Multi Fall Economic Statement
Small Scale Imaging X-ray 10 Multi Fall Economic Statement
Mobile Backscatter Imaging 2 GTA/QC Stolen Vehicles
Mobile Large Scale Imaging 1 QC Detection Technology Control Fund
Computed Tomography Scanner 9 Multi Initiative to Take Action Against Gun and Gang Violence
Pallet Large Scale Imaging 1 SOR Gordie Howe International Bridge
2027-2028
Tool Units Region Funding source
Handheld Raman 30 All Fall Economic Statement
Ion Mobility Spectrometer 25 All Fall Economic Statement
Mobile Backscatter ImagingFootnote 3 4 Multi Fall Economic Statement
Large Scale ImagingFootnote 3 3 Multi Fall Economic Statement
Pallet Large Scale Imaging 2 QC/PAC Fall Economic Statement
Computed Tomography Scanner 4 Multi Initiative to Take Action Against Gun and Gang Violence
2028-2029
Tool Units Region Funding source
Large Scale ImagingFootnote 3 4 Multi Fall Economic Statement
Handheld Raman 25 All Fall Economic Statement

Handheld RAMAN: unit ordered, to be delivered this fiscal

Pallet large scale imaging: units have been delivered in Canada, sites are being prepared and work has begun but final milestones will leak in 2026/27. Minimal risk as contract milestones have been amended, and finances will not lapse.

Mobile large scale imaging: units have been delivered, Site Acceptance Testing complete but not signed off. All issues with e-stop/boom were rectified. Final milestones will leak in 2026/27. Minimal risk as contract milestones have been amended, and finances will not lapse.

Fixed large scale imaging/ Small scale imaging: units have been delivered but final Operational Stress Testing and training cannot be completed until there is a secured Gordie Howe International Bridge opening date. All further milestones to be handled by Bridge project team.

Following the decision at Executive Committee Projects on , the following equipment will be ordered and delivered to Pacific Region in 26/27.

2 x Mobile Large Scale Imaging – Ordered , anticipated delivery: Q3/Q4 2026 ($8 million)

1 x Pallet Large Scale Imaging - Ordered , anticipated delivery: Q4 2026 ($4.8 million)

5 x RAMAN – Contract in place, lead time is 2 months. Order to be placed in early Q1 2026/27 (400,000)

0.5 x Mobile Backscatter – No contract in place yet. Anticipated Contract Award date: ($1 million)

This will free up $14.2 million of Fall Economic Statement funding in future years for Agency priorities such as mass-screening or other technology needs at new Ports. Project close out documents will be prepared and presented once all equipment has been delivered.

Traveller Modernization – Progress to date

  • Traveller Modernization (TM) is a multi-year initiative that will result in reduced manual transactions, the retirement of legacy IT infrastructure, and improvements to the border experience, not only for frontline officers, but also for Canadians and visitors to Canada
  • Budget 2021 included $337.6 million one-time funding and $26.6 million in ongoing funds for TM
  • TM is composed of 4 projects and 4 enabling components as described below

    Projects

    Traveller Compliance Indicator

    • A data analytics-driven Compliance Indicator that provides BSOs a traveller's history, assisting them in determining whether to release or refer the traveller based on passage and enforcement data
    • Delivered:

    Digital Traveller Experience

    • A single application that enables travellers to voluntarily submit digital identity information (incl. biometrics), their declaration and other information (for example, forms) in all modes.
    • By

    Officer Experience

    • A new centralized processing platform that consolidates all the information and processes required to process a traveller regardless of mode while leveraging biometrics and data analytics to allow for a more efficient processing.
    • By

    NEXUS eGate Highway

    • Equipping 18 NEXUS highway lanes with special gates, cameras and an intercom so that travellers can be processed from a command centre within the port
    • Cancelled due to audio issues and increased costs with limited benefits to be realized

    Advance Declaration

    • A feature in ArriveCAN that allows air travellers at large international airports the option to submit their customs and immigration declaration electronically, up to 72 hours before they arrive in Canada
    • Delivered:

    Free Flow International to International Transit

    • Put in place infrastructure and system adjustments in targeted airports to enable free flow transit for international air travellers who are not entering Canada
    • By

    Biometrics Program and Framework

    • A program framework, standards, processes and tools to guide the use of biometrics at the CBSA; A technical environment to conduct research, testing and evaluation.
    • By

    Legislative and Regulatory Change

    • Modernizing CBSA's legislative and regulatory framework to enable greater use of digital tools earlier in the traveller continuum to support a right-touch experience at the border.
    • Legislation:
      Regulations: By

    [Redacted]

  • Officer Experience: CBSA officers are currently required to use multiple, segmented systems to process travellers. This creates inefficiencies at the border as officers need to login and out of multiple systems to access and input the required data. The multitude of data sources makes program reporting challenging. The systems currently used to process travellers are 20+ years old. The CBSA would have difficulties delivering timely and effective border services if these systems were to fail
    • TM will deliver a new system that will be used to process travellers in all modes that leverages data-analytics and displays comprehensive traveller information to officers in a single interface
  • Digital Traveller Experience: Travellers expect a digital, user-centric experience when interacting with commercial airlines and border services. The CBSA only receives pre-arrival information for travellers arriving via commercial airlines, limiting CBSA's ability to complete risk assessments in advance of arrival. Paper-based forms are susceptible to errors and take longer to process, impacting the CBSA and Government of Canada (GOC)'s timely access to information to deliver their mandate (for example, the Cross Border Currency Reporting form will be digitized to strengthen the Canada's commitment to the Anti-Money Laundering/Anti-Terrorist Financing regime)
    • TM will deliver a mobile application that enables travellers to voluntarily submit digital identity information (including biometrics) and their customs declaration in all modes in advance of arrival to enable officers to focus on high value tasks instead of administrative data collection. It will also provide the ability for travellers to electronically submit select paper-based forms in advance of their arrival to Canada, enabling timely access to information for the CBSA and GOC partners

Current status and timelines

  • Development of the Officer Experience Solution (OES) is well underway. A limited, "Early Access Deployment" to 4 highway ports of entry is planned for summer 2026 while the national deployment to all 117 highway and ferry sites will begin in early 2027
  • CBSA is finalizing its plans for the Digital Traveller Experience (DTE) project and plans to begin execution of the redesigned mobile solution for travellers in Fall 2026

Funding History of the Traveller Modernization Initiative

Following approval of the Submission for Digital Traveller Experience in , there will be $93.8 million in one-time project funding and $19.3 million ongoing left to draw down from the fiscal framework. This submission will also serve to bring the scope of the Cross Border Currency Reporting (CBCR) project into the DTE project.

History

Funding profile excluding EBP, PSPC and SSC costs (in millions $)
Initiative
(part of B2021 Modernizing Trade and Travel at our Borders)
Funding sought for CBSA (Full cost) Prior years total 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 Total 2029-2030 and On-going
Theme: Traveller Modernization Original TB sub 106.3 over 7 years + 4.3 ongoing 64.7 10.8 4.1 4.1 3.8 3.8 91.3 3.8
TB Sub 2: CBSA Delivering Traveller Modernization Through a Digital Traveller Experience and Officer Experience 84.4 over 7 years + 2.9 ongoing 26.8 34.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 70.6 2.5
ARLU 2024-25 Reprofile (NEXUS)   (3.1) 3.1         0  
TB Sub 3: CBSA Delivering Traveller Modernization Through Officer Experience (approved ) 31.5 over 5 years
Note: The additional $6.1 million over 5 years + $0.3 million ongoing, come from CBSA's own reference levels
  4.6 20.6 6.7 0.6 0.6 33.2 0.3
ARLU 2026-27 Reprofile (Digital Traveller Experience and Officer Experience)       (4.5) 4.5     0.0  
ARLU 2026-27 CER (Digital Traveller Experience and Officer Experience)         (1.8) (1.8) (1.8) (5.2) (1.8)
TB Sub 4: Funding for modernizing travel by offering a Digital Traveller Experience at the Canadian border

Authorities received and funding will be received in future 2026-27 Supplementary Estimates

23.2 million of new funding over two years for the Digital Traveller Experience (DTE)       11.5 6.9   18.4  
Total Funding sought to date 245.5 over 7 years + 7.3 ongoing 88.4 52.5 22.6 27.5 12.0 5.1 189.8 4.8
Remaining in the Fiscal Framework 92.1 to be accessed through future submissions                

Totals may not add due to rounding

The TB Submission (Funding for Modernizing and Sustaining Travel and Trade at our Borders) also sought access to $6.9 million for Cross Border Currency Reporting (Economic and Fiscal Snapshot 2020) and $25.0 million for ArriveCan (Budget 2022), not included in the financial tables in this 2-pager as they were not part of the Modernizing Travel and Trade at our Borders initiative announced in Budget 2021.

Comprehensive Expenditures Review

  • Reduction totaling $52 million will start in fiscal year 2026-27 and on an ongoing basis
  • At the CBSA, the following three proposals totaling $52 million (including EBP) were submitted and approved by the Finance Minister and Prime Minister:
    • Use of equipment and assets more efficiently [Redacted]:
      • decommissioning applications
      • extending the useful life of fleet vehicle; and
      • decreasing the number of printers
    • Change to administrative models, planning functions, training and travel [Redacted]:
      • standardizing organization structure (VP office, DG and Directors)
      • scaling down branch functions
      • consolidating financial management nationally-centralization of resources under CFO
      • standardizing travel directives; and
      • reducing discretionary training
    • Effective workforce management [Redacted]:
      • reducing reliance on overtime and eliminating standby pay
      • improving volumetric data and detailed resource; allocation models for optimal staffing levels land and air
      • reviewing historical overtime through dashboards; and
      • assigning resources based on service standards (for example, border wait times)

[Redacted]

IT outages

  • Beginning on , the CBSA experienced multiple outages to major IT systems that resulted in delays in travellers and commercial processing
  • We recognize the impacts felt by travellers and traders when IT systems are down, which is why the CBSA has been working hard on a plan to better address outages when they occur and to prevent them from happening in the first place
  • Since the major outage last fall, a joint report by the CBSA and SSC has identified key causes and measures to better-prevent and mitigate outages. CBSA has been engaging air travel and commercial and trade stakeholders throughout the fall and winter to keep them updated on progress, and this will continue going forward
  • Budget 2025 has committed to reducing the cost of using and maintaining CBSA equipment and IT assets by decommissioning legacy software applications
  • In the event of an outage, the CBSA makes every effort to ensure an adequate number of primary inspection lines are open, while at the same time maintaining normal operations such as customs and immigration services, secondary examinations, enforcement activities, and commercial processing
  • Throughout an outage, the CBSA collaborates closely with airport and bridge authorities to facilitate the flow of travellers and commercial goods
  • Safety and security standards are upheld at all times, with border services officers working to verify travellers' identities, receive their declarations, and conduct any additional screening warranted by each traveller's individual circumstances. The CBSA works closely with airport and airline management to expedite traveller processing, minimize delays, and complete verifications as required
  • The CBSA has a System Outage Contingency Plan for Commercial processes that was developed in partnership with industry. The plan outlines requirements for reporting commercial transactions during an outage. It also provides guidance on the electronic submission of data once the system is back online. The CBSA accepts paper documentation during an outage and waives Administrative Monetary Penalties for Advance Commercial Information related infractions resulting from the outage
  • In the event of an outage of airport Primary Inspection Kiosks, travellers are re-directed to the primary inspection lines for manual processing. Outage protocols have been reviewed and re-iterated with CBSA operations and air industry partners to support business continuity at the border
  • As requested by the Minister of Public Safety, the CBSA and SSC provided a report on the September/October outages to their respective Ministers on . The CBSA and SSC closely examined the key causes of the outages and have developed a plan to prevent and mitigate future outages. The report was posted on the CBSA website on
  • CBSA/SSC Plan includes:
    • quality controls related to key IT changes
    • collaboration between CBSA, SSC and air industry and trade chain partners in planning IT changes
    • communications with industry partners
    • awareness of real world business impacts resulting from an outage of CBSA systems
    • integration of IT change and incident management among government and industry partners
    • revised outage protocols and business continuity plans to better prepare for digital disruption Progress to-date on the communication front includes strengthening the quality of existing messages to industry partners and expanding live communications to ensure operational effectiveness during incidents
    • SSC and the CBSA have integrated IT change and incident management processes and are continuing to collaboratively work together to execute the action plan
  • On , the Honourable Gary Anandasangaree, Minister of Public Safety, joined by Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) President, Erin O'Gorman, and Shared Services Canada (SSC) President, Scott Jones, hosted a virtual roundtable with industry partners to discuss recent CBSA information technology (IT) system outages
    • During the meeting, Minister Anandasangaree and our President expressed their personal commitment in working with partners to find solutions to disruptive system outages
    • During the open forum, partners voiced strong engagement and a willingness to continue working jointly with the Agency and SSC to address issues

10 point plan (System outage)

  1. Complete root cause analyses of all three incidents and apply recommendations and lessons learned
    • SSC and the CBSA have completed a joint investigation
  2. Establish joint IT change management committee with CBSA, SSC and air industry partners
    • Launch weekly change planning meetings with industry partners, starting the week of Oct. 20 with all airport authority CIO teams. Expand subsequently to domestic airlines, and then establish same with trade chain partners
    • Publish weekly forward schedule of changes to our industry partners
    • Strengthen existing CIO-level engagement with air industry partners
    • Establish CIO-level engagement with commercial and trade partners
  3. Improve CBSA and SSC change and incident management
    • Integrate incident change and management processes between the CBSA and SSC (immediately)
    • Establish CIO approval of all changes impacting the CBSA (immediately) and inform CBSA President and Shared Services Canada Deputy Head in advance of all changes
    • Ensure that all CBSA services, systems and applications, and their infrastructure dependencies are well-documented and understood (including certificate expiry dates)
  4. Conduct joint audit of IT Change Management and Incident Management by CBSA and SSC Chief Audit Executives, to evaluate effectiveness and make recommendations for improvement
  5. Improve industry partner communications and engagement channels and protocols
    • Document and enhance all industry partner communication processes and protocols regarding IT changes and incidents within the CBSA and between the CBSA and its industry partners
    • Review and strengthen the quality of messages to industry partners
    • Review and adjust active (live) communications tools such as MS Teams to ensure operational effectiveness during incidents
  6. Review and bolster the CBSA's IT systems and IT infrastructure hosted by SSC
    • SSC with CBSA to review the IT infrastructure that supports the CBSA's systems and applications and develop a plan to strengthen it, improve resiliency to changes and incidents
    • SSC and CBSA to improve automated monitoring of key systems and alerting of issues
    • CBSA and SSC to thoroughly review the CBSA's IT systems and applications that underpin key services and inter-operations with industry partners to determine ways to improve resiliency to changes and incidents
  7. Adjust the Agency's Investment Plan to prioritise technical debt reduction
    • Ensure that areas of aging systems and technologies are clearly identified for renewal in the CBSA's IT Investment Plan
  8. Adjust the Agency's crisis/emergency management plan and procedures based on recent events
    • Review CBSA and IT branch crisis management plans and procedures to ensure that experiences and lessons from these incidents are incorporated
    • Conduct table-top exercises to test the Agency's readiness for future major IT outages
  9. Improve the Agency's outage protocols and business continuity plans to better prepare for digital disruption
    • Review Travellers program outage protocols to:
      • Reinforce best practices for CBSA operations and airports to manage during PIK outages and ensure consistency across regions, airlines to manage during Interactive Advance Passenger Information/Passenger Protect Program outages
      • Revisit and update outage protocols procedures to continue traveller processing during IT outages
      • Revisit and update airport/airline procedures for to ensure alignment with CBSA processes/requirements
      • Ensure that all BCP documentation is up-to-date and available
    • Review Commercial program outage protocols and business continuity plans to incorporate best practices and innovations found during these incidents and harmonise across regions
    • Review intelligence business continuity plans and adjust for any gaps found related to IT system outages, if required
  10. Review federal government stakeholder communication protocols to increase broad awareness
    • Building on recent updates to the communication protocols, examine means of engaging and updating GC partners regarding significant CBSA incidents, outages and events, and revise or strengthen where required

10 point plan – Joint progress report

1. Complete root cause analyses of all three incidents and apply recommendations and lessons learned

Action 1.1:
SSC and the CBSA have a joint investigation currently underway, which will be completed by Oct. 31.
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Joint report completed and submitted.

2. Establish joint IT change management with CBSA, SSC and air industry partners

Action 2.1:
Launch weekly change planning meetings with industry partners, starting the week of Oct. 20 with all airport authority CIO teams. Expand subsequently to domestic airlines, and then establish same with trade chain partners.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Weekly engagement series set-up, one with Airport Authorities (AAs) and the other with domestic airline companies.

Action 2.2:
Publish weekly forward schedule of changes to our industry partners.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Forward schedule (FSC) is shared with established engagements stated in the above. A specific template was created in and ISTB is completing a Weekly Forward Schedule of Change and shares with industry partners.

Action 2.3:
Strengthen existing CIO-level engagement with air industry partners.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comments
CIO counterparts identified, communication channels established, and regular engagements scheduled. CIO meeting with AAs on January 22, and airlines on January 21.

Action 2.4:
Establish CIO-level engagement with commercial and trade partners.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
ISTB and CTB currently formalizing engagement approach within the BCCC consultative forum. The Terms of Reference have been drafted and was submitted for approval.

3. Improve CBSA and SSC IT change and incident management

Action 3.1:
Integrate IT change and incident management processes between the CBSA and SSC.
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:

Short term: Integrated RCW Change Approval process in place.

As of , a new integrated change management review and approval process based on risk and impact assessment was implemented.

Integrated Incident Management process in place, CBSA HART team has a direct line to IM coordinators at SSC.

Implemented interim incident coordination measures for CBSA High and Critical priority incidents and acceptance of CBSA priority classification without re-scoring.

CBSA included as an impacted partner on GCMS Critical incidents to ensure direct visibility.

Change Management Process includes daily review of changes with CBSA (Director and DG) including timing and potential system collisions, to then submit to CIO/ADM for final review and approval.

Long term: CRA-led CBSA-CRA-SSC working group to review an integrated approach to Incident Management launched.


Action 3.1.1:
SSC to onboard SSC service lines supporting CBSA to Enterprise ITSM System tool (ONYX)
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
In progress
Comment:
SSC remains committed to proceeding with the ONYX implementation as planned in July. While CBSA and CRA are experiencing constraints related to restricted change windows and the concurrent implementation of a new IT service management tool, SSC will continue to support the transition to ONYX.

Action 3.2:
Establish CIO approval of all changes impacting the CBSA and inform CBSA President and Shared Services Canada Deputy Head in advance of all changes.
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Integrated Change Approval Process identified above includes CIO-level approval from CIO/SADM and DMs are informed.

Action *3.3:
Ensure that all CBSA critical business applications and services, and their IT infrastructure dependencies are accurately documented and well-understood (including certificate expiry dates).
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
In progress

The 6 month delay is to complete the mapping of all IT infrastructure dependencies, as the initial assessment understated the level effort required. Automation is being leveraged to expedite the process.

Comment:

Application mapping has been organized into 5 steps to develop a repeatable process.

Step 1 establish foundational application-to-server mappings, to provide a minimum viable relationship model that enables future dependency analysis. This activity is complete for all CBAS applications. CBSA is now mapping remaining applications identified in the Application Portfolio Management (APM). Metrics show application to server mapping progress is at 85% complete.

Step 2-4: Automatic Infrastructure Discovery (TADDM) is underway and an initial technical blueprint of SSC-managed infrastructure supporting CBSA applications has been completed with some gaps. Investigation and review is underway.

Step 5: Integration into the Configuration management database that when aligned with validated application mappings (Step 1), this data will support impact analysis, change assessment, and incident response by answering "what is affected if this component fails."

Certificate Change & Management Runbook (SOP) has been drafted at the CBSA. The inventory development and the supporting process has been completed; as an evergreen document. Next step is to socialize with appropriate stakeholders. SSC is assessing the feasibility of including certificate dependency in CMDB.

Assessment of current state of upward traceability from applications to programs and services has confirmed there is no central repository available at this time. Working with architecture, IT continuity and change management to determine how best to incorporate as part of process improvements.


Action 3.4;
Conduct a joint SSC - CBSA review to identify and implement improvements to the oversight, requisite training and experience for employees in key IT change management roles.
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
In progress

Progress has been slower than anticipated due to competing priorities.

Comment:
Review is complete and implementation is underway in both departments of identified improvements.

Action 3.5:
Enhance SSC personnel awareness of CBSA operations, with a view to initiating cultural change that will improve personal and collective accountability. This will improve scrutiny, review, collaboration and communication to avoid similar human error in the future.

Action 3.5.1:
Deliver a plan to initiate cultural change.
Date:
Lead:
SSC
Current status:
In progress

This activity has proven to be difficult. Progress is being made, but more slowly than originally planned.

Comment:
Cultural Change strategy is in development; multi faceted approach to address the situation. Elements include:
  • Quality Assurance and Compliance
  • Problem Management Reset
  • Data Completeness
  • Mandatory Training

ADMs to meet early May to discuss implementation timelines and next steps.


Action 3.5.2:
Implement the plan for cultural change.
Date:
Lead:
SSC
Current status:
Not started

The date represents the completion date of this activity, which began immediately following completion of the plan (item 3.5.1).

4. Conduct joint audit of IT Change Management and Incident Management by CBSA and SSC Chief Audit Executives, to evaluate effectiveness and make recommendations for improvement

Action **4.1:
Chapter 1: IT Change Management
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Preliminary findings were distributed to senior management for feedback in early April and the draft final report was distributed on April 30. Senior management will review the recommendations and prepare management action plans during the month of . Formal endorsement of report and MRAPs will occur at CBSA and SSC audit committees in .

Action 4.2:
Chapter 2: IT Incident Management
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
Not started
Comment:

The second project is expected to begin in .

5. Improve communications and engagement channels and protocols, internally and with industry partners

CBSA/SSC Investigative Report was published on external CBSA website December 19. In discussions with Corporate Communications on approach to incorporate progress updates on the CBSA website.


Action 5.1:
Document and enhance all industry partner communication processes and protocols regarding IT changes and incidents within the CBSA and between the CBSA and its industry partners.

Action 5.1.1:
Airport Authorities
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
CBSA Escalation and Communication Framework for IT incidents has been updated and a new Standard Operating Procedure has been developed for communication with AAs and within the CBSA for IT changes.

Action 5.1.2:
Airlines
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Enhancements have been made to processes and protocols, new documentation is underway. Documentation for incident management completed, protocol for change management has been drafted.

Action 5.1.3:
Trade Chain Partners
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Enhancements have been made to processes and protocols. Documentation for incident management completed, protocol for IT change management has been drafted

Action 5.2:
Review and strengthen the quality of messages to industry partners.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Feedback received from TCPs on timing and level of detail received in current communication. Templates have been revised and put in to use as of December 10.

Action 5.3:
Review and adjust industry partner active (live) communications tools to ensure operational effectiveness during incidents.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
The CBSA has reviewed their industry partner active (live) communications tools and have adjusted to include an MS Teams channel for Airport Authorities (AAs) and another one for domestic airlines (including Airline Council). The implementation of this adjustment is complete for AAs, and the final step for domestic airlines is the approval of the Interim Authority to Operate.

Action 5.4:
Review and adjust internal CBSA communications protocols regarding IT changes and incidents.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:

CBSA Escalation and Communication Framework for IT incidents has been updated to reflect adjustments made in the internal communication protocols. Other Standard Operating Procedures from the Border Operations Centre, Corporate Communications and Digital Facilitation and Support services in IT Operations that relate to communications in terms of incidents and changes have been adjusted.
TB is drafting a comprehensive CONOPS that will explore future enhancements to internal CBSA communications in the event of incidents ().

6. Review and bolster the CBSA's IT systems and IT infrastructure hosted by SSC

Action 6.1:
SSC with CBSA to review the IT infrastructure that supports the CBSA's systems and applications and develop a plan to strengthen it, improve resiliency to changes and incidents.
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
In progress
Comment:
The CBSA has identified the key IT systems and applications critical to the delivery of services and inter-operations with industry partners that are vulnerable to outages and for which those outages are disruptive to safe, effective and efficient management of the border. Next step is to identify the end to end business flows that are automated by those systems and the related IT infrastructure dependencies to ensure that improvements are meaningful, measurable, and sustainable. A joint final report of ways to improve resilience will be delivered that covers 6.1 and 6.3. A working group has been established to deliver this report.

Action 6.2:
SSC and CBSA to improve automated monitoring of key systems and alerting of issues.
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
In progress

The extension to September relates to exploring and validating net-new monitoring efforts with a new SSC monitoring tool. This was not part of the original plan, but is an opportunity for significant improvement in automation.

Comment:

Travellers (PIK/PPP/IAPI)
Joint CBSA/SSC WG stood up to review the current automated monitoring landscape of PIK and findings determined existing tool coverage sufficient for application monitoring. CBSA reviewed existing PIK alerts and is implementing adjustments for both software and infrastructure to make them all resultant and then fine tune thresholds to eliminate false positives.

CBSA reviewed existing alerts for systems supporting both the Passenger Protect Program (PPP) and the Interactive Advance Passenger Program (IAPA), which are very similar, and confirmed the earliest step in the flow with industry partners (data acquisition) is covered and thresholds are valid. These alerts cover high priority flows, low priority flow and a no flow alert.

Commercial
Technical team monitoring processes for systems and applications within the commercial processing flow have been improved with earlier alerting of potential service degradation to key stakeholders, including the incident response team, resulting in improved resolution time and communication with industry partners.

Enforcement
Joint CBSA/SSC WG was stood up to review current ICES application level and full stack monitoring. The WG enabled full stack monitoring on select non-prod ICES servers and are exploring the use of the Dynatrace SSL certificates monitoring extension, capable of discovering, viewing and logging SSL certificates on monitored servers. CBSA has advised SSC that the existing combination of Wiley (monitoring software) and custom application + database monitors provide sufficient application monitoring.


Action 6.3:
CBSA and SSC to thoroughly review the CBSA's IT systems and applications that underpin key services and inter-operations with industry partners to determine ways to improve resiliency to changes and incidents.
Date:
Lead:
SSC/CBSA
Current status:
In progress
Comment:

The CBSA has identified the key IT systems and applications critical to the delivery of services and inter-operations with industry partners that are vulnerable to outages and for which those outages are disruptive to safe, effective and efficient management of the border. Next step is to identify the end to end business flows that are automated by those systems and the related IT infrastructure dependencies to ensure that improvements are meaningful, measurable, and sustainable. A joint final report of ways to improve resilience will be delivered that covers 6.1 and 6.3. A working group has been established to deliver this report.

7. Focus Government of Canada attention and priority on CBSA technical debt reduction

Action 7.1:
Ensure that areas of aging systems and technologies are clearly identified for renewal in the IT Investment Plans of both SSC and the CBSA.

Action 7.1.1:
CBSA
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
The CBSA IT investment plan was updated with available data gathered as part of the Agency investment planning efforts. A preliminary list has been shared with SSC to align their planning efforts. Continuous updates will be made following the quarterly review cycle prescribed by the TBS Integrated IT Planning Cycle/Departmental Plan on Service and Digital.

Action 7.1.2:
SSC
Date:
Lead:
SSC
Current status:
In progress
Comment:
SSC has provided a draft of the identification of infrastructure for renewal at the working-level. Next step is SSC ADMs to be briefed.

Action 7.2:
Engage central agencies to better-describe and prioritize Government of Canada critical services, to inform decisions on investment, workload management, resource allocation and operations.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
In progress

This activity has slipped due to continued issues with border IT that have diverted resources and somewhat changed the nature and urgency of the problem, and how it is documented.

Comment:
A state of affairs has been prepared on the central role of IT in border management and the need to invest further in CBSA's Digital Border and address technical debt. Focus will now shift to engaging central agencies and prepare for a Fall 2026 budget submission. Critical Path for Digital Border Plan to completed by May 1.

8. Adjust the Agency's emergency management plan and procedures based on recent events

Action 8.1:
Review CBSA and IT branch emergency management plans and procedures to ensure that experiences and lessons from these incidents are incorporated.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:

Strategic Emergency Management Plan (SEMP) review cycle started prior to 10 Point Action Plan and lessons learned incorporated, DG review held January 27. Tabling at EC for endorsement; postponed until further notice. Completed; not required to wait for governance.

IT procedures under review in parallel with other actions (3, 5, 9).


Action 8.2:
Conduct table-top exercises to test the Agency's readiness for future major IT outages
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
In progress
Comment:

Table-top exercise (TTX) to review existing communication processes for unplanned outages completed on December 4 and action items have been identified to improve.

A second TTX has been prepared to test the Security and Emergency Management Plan and Cyber Security Event Management Plan. Ready to execute, just awaiting exercise date. No date as of April 14.

9. Improve the Agency's outage protocols and business continuity plans to better prepare for digital disruption

Agency-wide review of business continuity plans was launched and action items 9.1.5/9.2/9.3 have been aligned with this exercise. The Agency's Business Continuity Management Program is supporting this renewal with a series of detailed guidance sessions for those critical service owners to assist in the completion/update of their BCPs.

Action 9.1:
Review Travellers program outage protocols to

Action 9.1.1:
Reinforce best practices for CBSA operations and airports to manage during PIK outages, and ensure consistency across the regions.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Best practices were re-distributed to the Regions, and subsequently reviewed and discussed through FMM governance. The practices were shared with Airports and will be further discussed with them in .

Action 9.1.2:
Reinforce best practices for CBSA operations and airlines to manage during Interactive Advance Passenger Information/Passenger Protect Program outages, and ensure consistency across regions.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:

IAPI: TB has assessed the current processes and has revalidated SOPs for air carriers.

PPP: As an interim measure, TB has assessed the current processes and has revalidated SOPs for air carriers. At the same time, TB is working with Transport Canada and Public Safety to develop additional mitigation measures.


Action 9.1.3:
Revisit and update outage protocols to continue traveller processing during IT outages.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:

TB distributed on , to frontline operations a quick reference guide that supports frontline officers during outages, ensuring continued traveller processing.

TB is drafting a comprehensive CONOPS that will explore future enhancements to internal CBSA communications in the event of incidents. On track for completion on . Publication of v1 will occur in May being an evergreen document and additional versions will be published to implement further enhancements as identified.


Action 9.1.4:
Revisit and update airport/airline procedures to ensure alignment with CBSA processes/requirements.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Finalized review of the airport /airline procedures and they are aligned with CBSA processes and requirements. TB will continue to monitor any changes or updates to processes and update these procedures where and when needed.

Action 9.1.5:
Ensure that related business continuity plans are revised to incorporate best practices and innovations found during these incidents and harmonized across regions.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Agency-wide review of business continuity plans has now launched; the exercise is scheduled to be completed by . TB's goal is to have any BCP pertaining to IT systems to be incorporated into the IT CONOPS they are developing, which includes the matrix that was developed and now is linked on Atlas to provide guidance on how to proceed when specific systems are offline or experiencing delays or outages.

Action 9.2:
Review Commercial program outage protocols and related business continuity plans to incorporate best practices and innovations found during these incidents and harmonise across regions.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:

Commercial procedures have been discussed and reviewed with CBSA internal partners, OGD partners and external commercial stakeholders.

Best practices identified during the outage along with feedback from Government of Canada partners and industry stakeholders have been incorporated into guidance for staff and draft revisions to the System Outages Contingency Plan (SOCP). BCCC System Outage Working Group held its second meeting on March 2 and discussed the Agency's efforts to address operational consistency during an outage. The plan was published .

Agency-wide review of business continuity plans has now launched; the exercise is scheduled to be completed by .


Action 9.3:
Review intelligence business outage protocols and continuity plans and adjust for any gaps found related to IT system outages, if required.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:
Based on discussions with IEB, no gaps were found related to IT system outages. They are participating in the Agency-wide review of business continuity plans and adjustments will be completed as part of this exercise.

10. Review federal government stakeholder communication protocols to increase broad awareness

Action 10.1:
Building on recent updates to the communication protocols, examine means of engaging and updating GC partners regarding significant CBSA incidents, outages and events, and revise or strengthen where required.
Date:
Lead:
CBSA
Current status:
Completed
Comment:

Corporate communications has developed an SOP to document the protocol to advise existing and newly identified GC partners in terms of corporate and public communication.

CTB has engaged with the Federal Border Partners Initiative to examines means of updating GC partners regarding incidents and outages that may impact programs and services that the CBSA administers on their behalf.

Annexe A

*3.3 This will be achieved with information from the latest Application Portfolio Management (APM) review exercise and the Business Impact Analysis (BIA) exercise as part of the Business Continuity Management Program. Both of these exercises were completed with business owners so their input will drive the technical mapping. Early indication is this will require more time but priority will be given to critical business applications that support PIK, IAPI, PPP, and ACROSS.

The scope of this sub-item will encompass the CBSA Critical Business Applications and Services (CBAS) that enable CBSA critical services, and which are operationally supported by the SSC. More specifically, business applications owned by the CBSA, business applications owned by 3rd parties that support CBSA critical services and the SSC infrastructure services that CBAS depend on to deliver a critical service.

For this sub-item, IT infrastructure dependencies will be mapped in alignment with the Application to Server Mapping Initiative launched by SSC for a sub-set of partner departments. This first-level mapping will be defined as the infrastructure CIs including the network and transport layers, including Windows, Linux and mainframe. The first-level of mapping will encompass:

  • Application to server
  • Application to application dependencies

For this sub-item, certificate management improvement will be achieved with the development of an integrated list of certificates that CBSA has visibility on and processes to maintain the data and integrate as part of broader change management practices.

**4.1 Developed through collaboration between the CBSA and SSC teams:

Audit Objective:
The audit's objective is to provide assurance that the CBSA and SSC have governance, coordination mechanisms, and key control activities in place to manage changes to IT systems supporting CBSA operations.

Audit Scope:
The period under review will span to . The scope of work will include an examination of IT change management governance, communications and collaboration mechanisms, and key control activities affecting CBSA systems and services.

Scope exclusions

  • IT change management activities performed within CBSA that do not relate to SSC's activities
  • IT change management activities performed by SSC that do not relate to CBSA's activities
  • Assessments of operational processes related to IT change management, such as, IT project management, IT asset management, configuration management, business continuity management, access management, data and information management, and IT security
  • A root-cause analysis of the incidents from

CARM

The CBSA Assessment and Revenue Management (CARM) is a new system for importers, designed to facilitate the collection of duties and taxes for commercial goods imported into Canada, which successfully came on line last year. With its launch, CARM became the official system of record for the collection of duties and taxes for commercial goods imported into Canada.

Those who seek to import goods into Canada need to register in CARM. When they do, they are able to use an online self-service tool to see their account, register for various CBSA programs, receive notifications, provide the CBSA with supporting documents, view account statements, make payments, and perform other activities.

Importers are also provided the opportunity to either pay their duties and taxes at the time of release when their goods enter the country or enroll in the release prior to payment (RPP) program and post financial security, which allows them to defer payment of duties and taxes.

When CARM launched, the CBSA also implemented regulatory amendments to require all importers (regardless of size) to post financial security rather than the broker posting security on their behalf, which was the previous practice. Once importers are enrolled in CARM, they can delegate day-to-day business to their customs broker. Small businesses still have the option to pay duties and taxes upon entry into Canada, but if they want the privilege to defer payment of duties and taxes, they are required to enroll in the release prior to payment program and post financial security.

The rationale for this is simple. With the broker-based security model, the CBSA had difficulty collecting on delinquent accounts and as such, had to write off debts for duties owing and in many cases, had limited to no recourse to collect on broker bonds. The regulatory changes to the Release Prior to Payment model that were introduced with CARM are designed to clarify and strengthen the accountability for the payment of duties and taxes owing. The intent is to reduce bad debt write-off by holding the importer and not the third party agent or customs broker responsible for any outstanding debt.

As of end of , over 237,900 businesses have enrolled in the CARM client portal. Volume of RPP enrolment for importer accounts is covering over 99% of historical release volumes.

Infrequent importers

Infrequent importers, who import only a few times per year, represent a slower enrollment rate as these importers may be seasonal or may never import again and will have no need to register in CARM or release prior to payment. A portion of these infrequent importers are also non resident importers, based in other countries, and may be less aware of CARM and the release prior to payment program, which is why we are amplifying our outreach to spread awareness. Nonetheless, the CBSA continues to see a trend of small businesses enrollment increasing daily.

Small Businesses

We understand that for some small businesses that import a few times a year, it may be more challenging to transition to CARM and post financial security. As such, we have worked with them to provide flexibility:

  • Provided a 210-day transition period that gave importers the time to post their financial security
  • Offered specific transition measures for a one year period, which were extended until or longer, to allow for the use of a broker's financial security for first time and one time importers and those who are in the process of registering in CARM and for release prior to payment
  • Offered contingency measures that allowed brokers to use their financial security for time-sensitive and perishable products, as well as goods that contribute to an individual's health and well being
  • Increased engagement efforts with a focus on small importers
  • Offered help-desk services by phone and by webform to help clients enroll in CARM and a dedicated line for brokers who are helping their client register in CARM

CARM frequent user feedback

CARM challenges for importers

Frequent feedback received from the trade community on CARM falls into the following categories. A number of steps have been taken to improve where possible.

Challenge 1: CARM client portal business account creation (in other words, onboarding)

Description:

CARM requires businesses to register for their CARM account in order to proceed with activities such as delegation of authority or enrolment in Release Prior to Payment. Steps to account creation require access to information that is often challenging particularly for small businesses due to a number of factors:

  • Legal entity name and/or address not up to date with CRA
  • Financial transactional information required to authenticate account not available, or not understood – resulting in helpdesk request for assistance

March updates

  • Volumes in March are consistent with February
  • Average of 396 calls received per day in March
  • Average of 261 webforms received per day in March
  • Onboarding remains top inquiry, particularly for small/micro businesses. Other importer segmentations (based on past 12-mth release volumes) are well over 99% onboarded (chart included at end)

April updates

  • Volumes remain relatively consistent over last six months (since )
  • April saw an increase in calls per day received, but a decrease in number of webforms received per day
  • Average of 422 calls received per day in April (up from 396 per day in March)
  • Average of 248 webforms received per day in April (down from 248 in March)
  • Onboarding remains top inquiry, particularly for small/micro businesses. Other importer segmentations (based on past 12-mth release volumes) are well over 99% onboarded (chart included at end). Of note, Small Importers are at 99.60% and Micro Small is at 94.19% which is very encouraging
  • Number of businesses onboarded at end of April is over 237,900 unique businesses. Over the last 3 months, average of 1400 businesses onboarded per week
Challenge 2: Helpdesk volumes and wait times

Description:

Helpdesk volumes remain high, particularly for onboarding and Release Prior to Payment assistance. Trade community callers are experiencing extended wait times on phone and webform responses.

March updates

  • Average telephone wait time for March was 18 minutes (up slightly from 17 in February, and down from 22 minutes in January)
  • Telephone response rate for March was 70% (72% in February and 66% in January)
  • Over 6-month period, 60% of inquiries received is via the telephone option (40% webform)
  • Helpdesk staff received 32 compliments in March (via Share your feedback with the Canada Border Services Agency) – total received for fiscal 25/26 is 99.

April updates

  • Average telephone wait time for April was 21 minutes (up slightly from 18 in March)
  • Telephone response rate for April was 67% (down slightly from 70% in March)
  • Increase in wait time and decrease in response rates due to increase in number of calls per day (1772 more calls in April than march)
  • Over 6-month period, 60% of inquiries received is via the telephone option (40% webform)
  • There is a trend in call volumes, where an increase in daily calls is experienced for the week following the Statement of Account issuance on 25th of each month. Moving forward, resource levels will adjust to accommodate these weeks
Challenge 3: External clients become unable to access previously created account

Description:

Helpdesk assistance is often required when:

  • Users who onboarded following Release 1 (in other words, early adopters) fall into the category of 24+ months of inactivity, where GCKey service has a system rule that deactivates the key. Helpdesk needs to perform a profile switch
  • Users forget username/password and either do not attempt recovery or erroneously revoke their existing key
  • Business Account Manager (BAM) changes, for example previous BAM leaves company without reassigning role to a new BAM

March updates

  • The number of BAM switches requested in March was 70 (down from 82 in February and 71 in January)
  • Turnaround times for BAM switches is less than 2 business days, with no current backlog existing

April updates

  • The number of BAM switches requested in April was 77 (slightly up from 70 in March). Numbers have remained stable over the last three months
  • Turnaround times for BAM switches is less than 2 business days, with no current backlog existing
  • Profile switches are performed on the telephone live
Challenge 4: Language used in CARM

Description:

Feedback from small businesses is that the language used in the CARM Portal is not clear or intuitive.

Updates

  • Changes implemented as of September 28
Challenge 5: Users with multiple businesses

Description:

The portal has been designed to operate by the principle of one user/login credential per business, which requires users who operate more than one business to have separate login credentials for each business.

Update

  • Not currently pursuing

Monthly statistics for previous 6 months

6 month total
Number of workable days 19 22 20 20 20 23  
Telephone statistics
Total calls received (month) 8,035 7,745 8,803 8,216 7,925 9,697 50,421
Total calls answered (month) 4,816 5,154 5,827 5,913 5,550 6,458 33,718
Average call received per day 423 352 440 411 396 422 407
Average call answered per day 253 234 291 296 278 281 272
Average wait time (in minutes for month) 30 20 22 17 18 21 21
Answer rate (received/answered for month) 60% 67% 66% 72% 70% 67% 67%
Webform statistics
Cases received (month) 5,460 4,893 5,549 5,141 5,219 5,714 33,803
Cases closed (month) 6,286 6,078 5,930 6,188 4,890 6,078 39,606
Case increase/decrease (month) minus826 minus1,185 minus381 minus1,047 329 minus364 minus5,803
Average case received per day 287 222 277 257 261 248 272
Average case closed per day 331 276 297 309 245 264 317
Total telephone and webform volume (6 mths) 84,224
Total answered/closed (6 mths) 73,324

Importer and release prior to payment enrolment – May 1 status update

April 2 to May 1 Enrollment
( + Enrollment New Importers)
Overall Enrollment
Category (Rel./Yr) Number of Clients Enrolled RPP Releases Enrolled since May 20th RPP Importers Enrolled Total RPP Importers Enrollment (%)
Very Small (1-10) 446 (+ 4,384) 668 (+ 5,232) 74,517 97,738 103,772 94.19%
Small (11-99) 2 (+ 19) 108 (+ 292) 15,254 40,196 40,359 99.60%
Med. (100-364) 0 0 2,041 9,978 9,989 99.89%
Large (365-4,999) 0 0 710 5,196 5,198 99.96%
XL (5,000+) 0 0 37 397 397 100.00%
Total 4,851 (448 + 4,403) 6,300 (776 + 5,524) 92,559 153,505 159,715 96.11%

New importers' refers to importers that did not have any importation history during the previous period covered by this dashboard

Fentanyl

What is CBSA doing about fentanyl

Over a year ago, I appointed a senior operational executive charged with coordinating our activities relating to opioids – from targeting to information sharing to collaboration with allies and Canadian police forces.

The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) plays a critical role in protecting Canada's national security and the safety of our communities. Every day, our officers work on the front lines to stop dangerous and illegal goods from reaching our streets. Recent operations have demonstrated both the scale of the threat and the Agency's unique capacity to respond. The below nationally focused operations are examples of this, and its results highlight why continued and enhanced investment in the CBSA is essential.

The CBSA works closely with a wide range of domestic law enforcement partners to deliver a coordinated approach to border security, public safety, and the enforcement of Canadian law. These partnerships recognize that border integrity is a shared responsibility and that no single organization can address complex threats such as organized crime, human smuggling, firearms trafficking, or national security risks on its own.

The CBSA is participating in the Joint Operations Intelligence Centre (JOIC) led by the RCMP, in response to the PM's Directive to establish a JOIC to increase intelligence production and enhance information sharing and cooperation among security intelligence and law enforcement. The JOIC provides a consolidated all-source intelligence threat picture and increase intelligence production that can be shared with domestic and ally partners, with a view to reduce and disrupt transnational criminal activities in North America, especially in relations to drugs and precursors.

Cooperation between U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) is built around securing the shared border while facilitating the efficient movement of people and goods. The relationship has evolved over decades but intensified after , when both countries sought to prevent security threats without "thickening" the border. This led to a shared emphasis on risk management, information sharing, and coordinated operations rather than purely physical inspection at ports of entry.

At the operational level, collaboration includes joint enforcement and inspection activities. Integrated Border Enforcement Teams bring together CBP, CBSA, and other U.S. and Canadian law enforcement partners to target organized crime, smuggling, and national security threats between ports of entry. In parallel, preclearance programs allow CBP officers to conduct inspections in Canada before travel to the United States, streamlining passenger flows and enhancing security under the Land, Rail, Marine, and Air Transport Preclearance Agreement that entered into force in 2019.

The CBSA also works extensively with international partners beyond the United States to strengthen border security, facilitate legitimate trade and travel, and combat transnational crime. This cooperation supports Canada's broader objective of "pushing the border outward" by addressing risks before people or goods reach Canadian ports of entry. Much of this work is conducted through legally binding agreements, multilateral organizations, and the deployment of CBSA personnel abroad to support intelligence collection, capacity building, and operational coordination.

We continue this work in force, through focused efforts, such as Operation Blizzard, where we dedicated resources over a four (4) week period and looked at 691,000 packages in air, postal, marine and land modes.

  • The results were: 67.5% of all seizures made were of illegal narcotics coming to Canada from the United States, while 17.5% were of narcotics going to the United States. These included:
    • 116 fentanyl seizures (1.73 kg), intercepted in British Columbia, Québec and Alberta. Of these seizures, 1.44 kg were on route to the United States and 0.26 kg were destined to other countries
    • 17 meth seizures (5.38 kg and 89 pills)
    • 24 cocaine seizures (13 kg)
    • 26 heroin seizures (0.19 kg)
    • 17 opium seizures (38.84 kg and 11 bottles)
    • 48 MDMA seizures (2.32 kg and 82 pills)
    • 249 cannabis and cannabis related product seizures
  • The United States was the country of destination or origin for over 85% of all seizures made during the Operation

Additionally, Operation Meridian was a targeted, 60 day surge operation conducted in Southern Ontario under Canada's Border Plan. Its objective was clear: disrupt the import and export of illicit narcotics and other contraband moving through commercial channels at major ports of entry. To achieve this, our border services officers intensified examinations of both inbound and outbound commercial shipments, leveraging advanced detection tools and intelligence.

  • The results were : 90 percent of these seizures involved attempts to smuggle goods into Canada. These include:
    • 108 kg of cocaine
    • 350 kg of methamphetamines
    • 266 kg of khat
    • Firearms, other prohibited weapons, and substantial amounts of undeclared currency tied to criminal proceeds were also seized
  • These enforcement outcomes also translated into real public safety results. Criminal charges were laid against five individuals, and 16 additional investigations remain ongoing

Operation Autumn Watch was a focused enforcement initiative designed to identify potential vulnerabilities at small and medium sized land commercial ports of entry. The operation targeted the possible smuggling of fentanyl, other illicit narcotics, precursor chemicals, and firearms. The initiative was executed through a series of five day pulse enforcement activities carried out by participating regions in the commercial highway mode.

  • The results: a total of 2,844 commercial examinations were completed and 38 seizures. These includes: illicit narcotics, prohibited weapons, and various forms of contraband. Notably, no fentanyl or precursor chemicals were detected during the operation. This outcome suggests that smaller and medium sized ports of entry may not currently represent an elevated risk for smuggling these particular substances

The CBSA recently concluded Operation Sky Shield, a month-long interdiction operation targeting the export smuggling of methamphetamine, cocaine, and illicit narcotics and precursors in the air and postal modes destined to New Zealand and Australia. During Operation Sky Shield, 19,188 examinations were conducted, and our officers made a total of 122 seizures:

  • 25,317.8 grams of methamphetamine (32 seizures)
  • 864 grams of cocaine (6 seizures)
  • 131 grams of 4-Hydroxbutanoic Acid (GHB) (1 seizure)
  • 56, 638.96 grams and 128 dosages of various cannabis forms (60 seizures)
  • 32 grams of Ketamine (1 seizure)
  • 283.87 grams of MDMA (8 seizures)
  • 2.59 grams of methadone (1 seizure)
  • 1,294.8 grams of psilocybin (12 seizures)
  • One thermal imaging device (missing export declaration)

[Redacted]

As a member of the Canadian Integrated Response to Organized Crime (CIROC), CBSA participated in the National Fentanyl Sprint 2.0, which aimed to highlight efforts to identify and disrupt fentanyl traffickers and dismantle their laboratories and organizations. The Sprint's goal was to highlight and quantify the results when CIROC members leveraged their authorities and shared intelligence that led to cutting off supply chains, ultimately holding traffickers accountable and protecting the public from the dangers of illicit fentanyl.

  • As part of the Sprint, the CBSA prevented the following quantities of controlled substances from entering Canada:
  • 3,000 kg of cocaine
  • 1,700 kg of methamphetamine
  • 2.6 kg of fentanyl (5% from the United States)

As we look ahead, the CBSA continues to advance several additional focused enforcement operations currently underway across the country. These initiatives are already yielding promising early indicators, and we will be in a position to share their full results once each operation concludes. As such, an Enforcement Operations Council was established to improve coordination and oversight of enforcement operations. The Council focuses on current and future enforcement operations, examine results and trends stemming from significant seizures, customs related enforcement activities, and update enforcement and interdiction priorities. It functions as a national forum to set enforcement priorities, direct enforcement efforts, and ensure a cohesive enforcement approach across intelligence, enforcement, and operational domains.

Fentanyl stats for 2025 (in grams)
Export Import Grand total
January 0.00 0.00 0.00
February 131.00 16.50 147.50
March 1,628.90 11.60 1640.50
April 378.35 0.10 378.45
May 118.10 0.25 118.35
June 17.80 27.29 45.09
July 176.80 61.80 238.60
August 5.20 0.00 5.20
September 0.00 1.00 1.00
October 0.00 1.50 1.50
November 0.00 4.21 4.21
December 0.00 190.01 190.01
Grand total 2,456.15 314.26 2,770.41
Fentanyl stats for 2026 (in grams)
Export Import Grand total
January 0.00 0.00 0.00
February 0.00 2.40 2.40
March 102.60 33.70 136.30
Grand total 102.60 36.10 138.70

Key Takeaways:

  • The amount of overall fentanyl seized in Q1 of calendar year 2026 was 138.70g, which is a 92% decrease compared to the 1,788.00g seized in Q1 of calendar year 2025
  • In Q1 of calendar year 2025, the amount of export fentanyl seized was 1,759.90g compared to 102.60g in Q1 of calendar year 2026. This was a sharp decline of 94%
  • In Q1 of calendar year 2025, the amount of import fentanyl seized was 28.10g compared to 36.10g in Q1 of calendar year 2026. This was a marginal increase of 29%
  • A large volume of small fentanyl seizures in March 2025 contributed to the high total for the Q1 of calendar year 2025, a spike likely caused by Operation Blizzard

Duty to accommodate

What is CBSA's duty to accommodate

In 2016, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) completed arming its workforce at ports of entry and in intelligence and enforcement functions. CBSA officers perform a range of duties in support of the safety and security of Canada, and in most modes, carrying a duty firearm is a condition of their employment.

As a member of the core public administration, the CBSA addresses workplace issues in adherence to the Public Service Employment Act, the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act, and other relevant legislation. It develops related policies in alignment with collective agreements, jurisprudence, and Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada directives that apply across departments.

The Agency takes its responsibilities and obligations stemming from the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) and the Employment Equity Act. When someone can no longer be fully armed or meet the requirements of related job functions, the CBSA follows the same principals and requirements that govern the duty to accommodate as other federal government departments to accommodate them. The Agency also has a duty to spend taxpayer money wisely and to ensure that employees meet the essential requirements for positions which are classified, allocated, and funded on the assumption that they will be occupied by an armed officer supporting enforcement activities.

The duty to accommodate is a legal obligation to prevent or remove discriminatory impacts on employees based on protected grounds such as disability. It requires the CBSA to provide reasonable accommodations, which might include employment in a non-armed position.

The employer's obligation to accommodate stops when it becomes undue hardship, a threshold determined by factors including health, safety, and cost. The CBSA is not required to permanently exempt an employee from doing the essential duties of their position or create work that is not necessary. Additionally, accommodation measures are subject to periodic review.

An employee must cooperate with their employer's attempt to accommodate their needs, and rejecting a reasonable accommodation offer can bring employment to an end.

We are committed to working with employees requiring accommodations. The Accommodation page on Canada.ca provides additional information.

Please note that injury-on-duty leave is granted to border services officers in accordance with Article 37 of the Border Services (FB) Collective Agreement and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat's Injury-on-duty Leave Policy.

First port of arrival

The Canada Border Services Agency's resources are strategically allocated to respond to the threats and service needs at ports of entry, including shipping ports and rail yards.

Dedicated facilities for the examination of sea containers are already in operation in the country's five major seaports. These facilities have state-of-the-art tools and trained officers to enable the examination of imported goods and ensure that all requirements of program legislation are met, in order to protect the health, safety and security of Canadians.

Ensuring control of a commercial container port requires new infrastructure, Border Services Officers resources, detection technology/equipment and training to ensure the integrity of the program.

This includes radiation portals to screen all containers entering Canada. Following the events of , Canada and the United States signed the Container Security Initiative, which aims to detect and interdict terrorists, weapons of mass destruction, radiation threats, narcotics and other contraband arriving in marine containers as early as possible in the supply chain. U.S. Safe Ports Act mandates 100 percent screening by imaging and radiation detection for U.S.-bound marine containers.

As a result of this agreement, the CBSA screens all containers for radiation at its five marine ports, which represent 99% of all international container traffic into Canada.

Decisions relating to port infrastructure and supply chain fluidity are broader than CBSA. We work with Transport Canada, International Trade and others in the federal and provincial systems to determine how best to support trade goals.

In terms of ports, they provide data on their business modeling, source of their cargo and ability to make necessary investments in infrastructure for CBSA.

Will CBSA equip additional ports

The CBSA is committed to working with industry and key Government of Canada stakeholders to consider proposals for the expansion of services to support trade diversification. We recognize that reliable and efficient supply chains are an essential part of trade diversification and economic success; however, the emergence of new health, safety and security risks pose a serious threat to Canada and the world and have economic impacts as well.

Due to the complexity of placement of ports and their impact on trade diversification, a Government of Canada-wide decision (including Public Safety, Global Affairs Canada, Transport Canada, and CBSA) is required to identify and prioritize additional ports for container import and export designation, to help catalyze private investment at ports and diversify our trade, but also ensure that ports are properly equipped to detect and intercept illegal goods and contraband.

Budget 2025 recognized the need for a broader and more strategic approach to port infrastructure, by stating: "CBSA will work with Public Safety, Transport Canada, and Global Affairs Canada to identify additional ports for container import and export designation." The most effective means of ensuring that ports are designated in a way that provides a net benefit to Canada and an efficient allocation of capital is to consider specific corridors, their current port capacity and the most effective expansion, having regard for broader issues such as trade and supply chain infrastructure.

Budget 2025 funding is complementary to the $1.3 billion Border Plan announced in , which together will allow the CBSA to hire up to 1,000 new officers, to be deployed across the country. However, officers alone are only one requirement to open a port to international containerized cargo.

Marine port expansions, regardless of volume, involve several steps among multiple players. The port itself requires capital to undertake the physical expansion activities, as well as approval as a "First Port of Arrival" location to receive international containerized cargo, which is a policy held by the CBSA. Port owner/operators are responsible for providing the infrastructure for containers to be presented to and examined by the CBSA when requested. The CBSA is responsible for deploying equipment including detection technology and staffing the port to a level that allows goods to move as quickly as possible, while intercepting contraband like guns, drugs, and stolen vehicles.

Will CBSA put officers at Valleyfield

Should Valleyfield seek to become a first port of arrival that can receive international marine containers, they would need to submit an application to the CBSA that includes a clear business case and meet all Government of Canada requirements, such as providing the CBSA with a Container Examination Facility.

The Port of Valleyfield does not have a permanent CBSA officer presence. However, CBSA officers travel to Valleyfield to provide services according to the licenses that the port currently holds.

The Port of Valleyfield currently has a Commercial Vessel designation, which allows them to import bulk goods and receive commercial vessels, not including international marine containers.

In addition, the Port of Valleyfield has a valid sufferance warehouse license, which allows for the importation of non-containerized cargo include: steel coils/plates, general cargo (project/industrial machinery/transformers), general cargo – bulk (bauxite) and pipes. CBSA officers will conduct examinations of commercial goods in their warehouse as needed.

While the Port of Valleyfield has expressed interest in receiving marine containers, no formal request has been submitted to the CBSA for First Port of Arrival Container Service to date. The port lacks all essential infrastructure (such as radiation portals, and a container examination facility) and equipment, detection tools, and resources to receive and process marine containers. For the CBSA, a significant investment in labor, equipment/vehicles, and training would be necessary to ensure the port is properly equipped to meet the CBSA's mandate. Valleyfield would require a dedicated on-site workforce due to the significant distance between the Lacolle POE and the Port of Valleyfield and the potentially significant volume of operations.

Page details

Date modified: