CBSA questions and answers: Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security: Foreign Nationals (December 2, 2025)
Question period note: Removals
Key messages
The CBSA removed over 18,000 inadmissible people last fiscal year—the highest in a decade and an increase from approximately 16,000 the year before.
The Border Plan provided $55.5 million to support immigration and asylum processing and to increase CBSA's capacity to reach 20,000 removals for fiscal years 2025–2026 and 2026–2027.
Budget 2025, and the Border Plan, puts Canada's safety at the forefront by hiring 1,000 new CBSA officers, some of which will be dedicated to removals.
The CBSA is already well on its way to meet this objective having already enforced nearly 14,000 removals since .
Removing individuals inadmissible to Canada for reasons of security and criminality is a priority for the CBSA who removed over 700 such individuals since , a 20 per cent increase over last year.
If pressed – Immigration warrants
CBSA arrests, detains and removes foreign nationals who should not be in the country and who pose a security threat to the public.
When an inadmissible foreign national does not report for removal, CBSA will initiate an investigation and issue a warrant.
Immigration warrants are sent to the Canadian Police Information Centre so that local police may notify CBSA if they encounter an individual subject to an immigration warrant.
Over 550 CBSA personnel are dedicated to immigration investigations and removals. They are focused on cases that pose a risk to security and public safety.
CBSA also has a tip line for the public to share information about the whereabouts of those who are trying to evade the law.
Last year, CBSA closed 542 immigration warrants involving inadmissible individuals with criminal convictions and 254 so far this year. They also removed 905 individuals inadmissible for criminality, organized criminality and security.
Individuals subject to immigration warrants include cases of people that are presently serving a criminal sentence who's whereabouts are known. Warrants are issued to ensure that CBSA is notified upon completion of their criminal sentence.
Background
Issue
Enforcing removal of people who do not have the right to stay in Canada.
Information to support key messages
The process for determining inadmissibility begins with the issuance of a 44 report that outlines the inadmissibility and referral of the report to an authorized decision-maker. Depending on the inadmissibility ground and status of the individual, a Minister's Delegate may issue a removal order or the case may be referred to the Immigration Division at the IRB for an admissibility hearing.
The removal of foreign nationals that are found inadmissible as per the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) is an integral part of the CBSA's security mandate. Individuals may be inadmissible for a variety of reasons including security; criminality; organized crime, international human rights violation, non-compliance with the IRPA, etc..
The CBSA prioritizes removals based on a risk management regime that assigns the highest priority to cases involving security, organized crime, crimes against humanity, and criminality. These are followed by failed refugee claimants as second tier, and all other inadmissible persons as the lowest priority.
All individuals who are subject to enforcement action and ordered to be removed from Canada have access to due process before the law. They may seek redress through various processes at the IRB (appeals), the Federal Court of Canada (judicial review) and if eligible, at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (pre-removal risk assessment if they feel they may be subject to persecution in their country of origin, and humanitarian and compassionate applications for permanent residence). Please note that there are legislated factors that allow or deny access to some of these processes.
The CBSA's removal efforts may be hindered and delayed by impediments such as uncooperative foreign nationals who do not provide necessary information or documentation to allow for their removal, or foreign governments that refuse the return of their nationals, or fail to promptly issue timely travel documents. The CBSA works closely with foreign governments, Canadian officials abroad, and other departments to resolve these challenges, and participates in international forums to identify joint strategies and best practices to achieve timely removals of inadmissible persons.
The CBSA has an inventory of high-risk individuals, including those with serious criminality, whose whereabouts are unknown and Canada-wide immigration warrants have been issued for their arrest.
A Wanted by the CBSA web page was launched in 2011 and remained active until 2023, during which a total of 159 individuals were featured on the webpage. Some of these individuals were located and arrested as a result of tips received from the public.
Public posting of certain immigration warrants for removal was used as a last resort by CBSA in order to locate individuals with serious inadmissibility concerns (e.g., serious criminality involving violence). The web page was removed in 2023 because investigative tools and methods had evolved, making it no longer necessary for operations.
The Fall Economic Statement (FES) provided $55.5 million over three years to the CBSA to support front-end immigration and asylum processing activities, and achieve a 25% increase in the number of removals enforced. This includes reducing inventory backlogs, increasing removal capacity and addressing the anticipated increase in associated removals litigation. The funding will primarily be used to secure regional staff and ensure the program has necessary resources to achieve 20,000 removals in fiscal year 2025–2026 and fiscal year 2026–2027.
In response to the significant increase in individuals making asylum claims in Canada, the CBSA aligned its resources to enforce removal orders in a more efficient and timely manner. A Removals Action Plan has also been developed to further enhance program delivery and address outstanding issues, including prioritizing cases to overcome impediments to removal, leveraging existing resources more efficiently, and engaging priority countries to expedite removal processes.
Canada Border Services Agency conducts extensive investigations to locate individuals wanted for removal who have criminal records pursuant to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). This generally includes offences that may range in severity to non-violent crimes such as fraud over $5000 to more serious offences, such as assault causing bodily harm.
Foreign nationals facing removal may include those who are still serving a criminal sentence or have pending criminal charges. Until the criminal matters are resolved, they cannot be removed. CBSA may issue a warrant for arrest, to ensure that CBSA is notified following the completion of their criminal custody.
The wanted inventory is updated daily, as individuals are located and consequently removed, while new cases are added as the CBSA works through its removals inventory. However, the inventory reflects a cumulative total cases over many years.
It is important to note that Canada's immigration system does not allow for the proactive arrest and detention of every person subject to enforcement action. The IRPA contains provisions for the CBSA to arrest and detain those who pose a danger to the public and/or who are unlikely to appear for an immigration process. Often, persons subject to immigration enforcement are cooperative until they have exhausted all appeal mechanisms and then fail to report. As well, in many cases, foreign nationals who left Canada without confirming their departure remain in the wanted inventory until sufficient information is obtained through a case by case examination of exit data and information gathered from other sources.
Over the last two fiscal years (2023–2024 / 2024–2025), approximately 4000 individuals entered CBSA's wanted for removal inventory. During that same period, the Agency 34,500 people were removed from Canada.
As of , there are over 30,000 individuals in the CBSA's removal-in-progress inventory, which is more than double that of five years ago, due to a cumulative growth in failed refugee claims.
Please find below removals enforced by fiscal year:
| Removals enforced | |
|---|---|
| 2020 to 2021 | 11,262 |
| 2021 to 2022 | 7,530 |
| 2022 to 2023 | 10,240 |
| 2023 to 2024 | 16,343 |
| 2024 to 2025 | 18,048 |
What is the CBSA's plan to hire 1,000 officers
In response the Governments commitment to reinforce our borders, the CBSA will recruit, train and deploy 1,000 new CBSA officers across our country. We will bolster our capacity across the border continuum to address enforcement and oversight in the commercial, traveller and trade streams, strengthening the CBSA's ability to detect, disrupt and deter illegal activity.
There will be officers deployed to ports of entry, internationally and at inland offices where targeting, trade investigations, intelligence, inland enforcement and criminal investigations take place.
We expect that approximately 80% of new CBSA officers will be recruited as border services officers, trained by the CBSA College in Rigaud, Quebec, and deployed across the country to ports of entry. The CBSA College will begin the intake of new BSO Trainees to support this initiative in 2025–2026.
We also expect that approximately 20% of the 1,000 CBSA officers will carry out other operational roles. These include targeting centre officers, trade and recourse officers, inland enforcement officers, criminal investigators, intelligence officers, international liaison officers, chemists and engineers. Some will come from the border services officer ranks, others will come from other parts of the CBSA and from public safety partners in the federal government. We will also look to hire veterans of the Canadian Armed Forces as well as graduating students from universities.
If pressed: On training
The CBSA College will train most of the 1,000 officers. Through the Agency's Force Generation program, we are able to resource the frontline personnel required to carry out our mandate. The primary part of the program is the Officer Induction Model (OIM) which is comprised of three phases: Recruitment, the Officer Induction Training Program (OITP) and the Officer Induction Development Program (OIDP).
During the recruitment phase, prospective candidates go through very rigorous pre-screening that can take between 9 to 12 months, before they are invited to attend the CBSA College through the Officer Induction Training Program (OITP). The OITP is an 18 week program inclusive of 4 weeks of online training and 14 weeks of in class training at the CBSA College in Rigaud Quebec. Upon graduation from training, BSO Trainees are deployed to the regions, and supervised by experienced officers through the Officer Induction Development Program (OIDP) for up to 12 to 18 months before being permanently appointed to the rank of a Border Services Officer.
Complementary to the OIM, training will be delivered to experienced CBSA officers in the other operational roles, in alignment with established National Training Standards for their position. The Standards outline the training expectations for various job communities such as inland enforcement officers and criminal investigators, enabling the development of officers into specialized functions, through skill enhancements beyond the scope of the OIM program. The CBSA College, through its many satellite campuses delivers most of the training to support these communities, alongside on the job training specific to certain roles (e.g international liaison officers will receive specific training from Global Affairs Canada before their deployment).
Our comprehensive training and development program ensures individuals have the skills and experience to do the jobs being asked of them. We do not compromise our qualification standards in the hiring process as many of these officers will continue their careers with the Agency, taking on many other operational roles.
If pressed: Where will these people work?
These CBSA officers will work across the country at our ports of entry, inland offices, national offices, and internationally. This investment is not going towards internal services, which will be absorbed by the CBSA.
Additional background:
The CBSA implementation plan will leverage the full capacity of the CBSA College annually at the Rigaud campuses and all satellite campuses across the country, allowing us to fulfill existing attrition requirements, as well as expedite the delivery of new officers to the operations.
Through ongoing recruiting efforts, we have a pool of 300 vetted and qualified candidates that we can invite to begin training at any given time in the next unfilled cohort.
We continue to hire students, 400 new and returning students per year, who have become an essential feeder group to our indeterminate officer core. They are a complementary component of our workforce, as they provide temporary relief to manage fluctuations in seasonal traveller and commercial volumes. They complete trained at the CBSA College or in regional satellite campuses.
36 border services officer recruits began their in-house training at the CBSA College in Rigaud on . They are expected to graduate on . An additional 18 officer recruits began their distance learning in and will begin their in-house training at the College on . They are expected to graduate on .
As of , the CBSA College will run up to 10 cohorts per year until 2028–2029, to fulfill the commitments made in Budget 2025, with a new cohort beginning training every 5 weeks.
Overview of BSO training
1. Officer Trainee Entrance Exam (OTEE)
The candidate must pass an online exam that assesses their reasoning skills, writing skills, analytical thinking and client orientation. They will have 135 minutes to complete 117 multiple-choice questions where 60% correct in each competency is required to be successful. If they have passed the OTEE in a previous selection process, they do not need to retake the exam.
Interview
If successful at the OTEE, the candidate will attend an MS Teams video interview that consists of situational questions and role-playing scenarios. Previous knowledge of the CBSA is not required. Proof of a valid full driver's license without restrictions will be requested and verified prior to the interview.
- Candidates are assessed on the competencies below and must demonstrate each of these to the level required in the assessment to be considered successful
- dealing with difficult situations
- decisiveness
- effective interactive communication
- judgment
- personal integrity
- values and ethics
2. Validation of Prerequisites
If successful at the interview, the candidate will be required to provide proof of the following before they can complete the psychological assessment (MMPI):
- Canadian citizenship or permanent residency
- High school diploma or employer-approved alternative (note: the CBSA does not consider an acceptable combination of education, training, and/or experience as an alternative. The NORP is currently using the GCT2 as the PSC approved testing equivalent)
3. Psychological Assessment (MMPI)
A psychologist will evaluate the candidate's ability to handle stress and suitability to carry a duty firearm.
- The MMPI will consist of two parts on separate days
- First, a written exam (2-4 hours total)
- followed by an in-person interview
If deemed unsuitable, the candidate is removed from the selection process. Only a determination of "suitable" or "not suitable" will be provided. A signed consent form before the assessment explains that beyond this result, no feedback, test scores, or other information can be provided.
4. Physical Abilities Test (PAT)
The PAT replaces the PARE from previous selection processes and is performed during the Officer Induction Training Program (OITP) in-residence training.
Candidates will be invited to a mandatory PAT information session once they have been found suitable at the psychological assessment.
5. Firearms Safety Courses
To ensure candidates can safely handle a firearm during training and on the job, they must complete the Canadian Firearms Safety Course (CFSC) and the Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course (CRFSC).
Once the candidate reaches this step in the selection process, they are given 3 months to complete both courses. Failure to do so may result in their removal from the selection process.
Although a Possession and Acquisition License (PAL) is not required, it is accepted as proof that both courses have been completed.
6. Medical Exam (Category III)
Candidates will receive an invitation from CBSA with a form to complete which will be provided to Health Canada (HC). HC will then contact the candidate directly to schedule the appointment to determine if the candidate is medically fit to train and work as a BSO through the completion of a confidential health questionnaire and medical exam by a doctor.
7. Second Language Evaluations (SLE)
If the candidate applied for a bilingual position (English and French only), they must complete the SLEs and achieve the intermediate level (BBB).
The CBSA only accepts results for SLEs administered by the PSC.
8. Security Clearance
Candidates need an Enhanced Reliability Status plus Secret Clearance to train and work as a BSO. CBSA Security relies on external partners to complete the security screening.
The CBSA will email the candidate results after they complete the telephone integrity interview.
All candidates must go through this process, even if they have security clearance from another government department or law enforcement agency.
If the candidate is successful at the CBSA Officer trainee selection process, they placed in our pre-qualified pool of OITP ready candidates and can be invited om the next unfilled cohort.
OITP Phase 1 – Online Training
When candidates are selected for OITP, they will receive an invitation and will be assigned to their work location/POE. While the CBSA does our best to post candidates in their preferred region (1st, 2nd, 3rd choices), they may be posted elsewhere based on POE staffing vacancies and the Agency's needs.
- The 3 to 9 month waiting period to be invited to participate at OITP is dependent on cohort availability
- Invitations are sent:
- approximately 6 to 12 months after they complete all the required assessments; and
- about 5 weeks before Phase 1 starts
They will complete four weeks of online training at home. Which is a mix of self-learning and instructor-led video sessions. It includes quizzes, activities, assignments, collaborative discussions, and forum postings.
OITP Phase 2 – Canada Border Services College
The candidate will then complete 14 weeks of training at the Canada Border Services College in Rigaud, Quebec.
They will learn about:
- the primary inspection process
- the secondary inspection process
- customs
- immigration
- food, plant and animal
- policies, procedures and laws that we administer and enforce
- seizures, detentions, personal searches and arrests
- how to determine the admissibility of persons and goods
- defensive tactics
- duty firearms
Overview of the BSO training
Figure 1 - Text version
Journey to the frontline
Here's what the Officer Trainee Development Program selection process looks like, including wait times for receiving assessment results
The order of some assessments arranged by the CBSA may slightly vary.
Selection process duration approx. 12 to 18 months (Stages 1 to 9)
Stages:
- Officer Trainee Entrance Exam (OTEE)
- Interview
- Validation of Prerequisites
- Psychological Assessment (MMPI)
- Physical Abilities Test (PAT) information Session
- Firearms Safety Courses Results: vary by provider
- Medical Exam (Category III)
- Second Language Evaluations (SLE)
- Security Clearance
- Officer Induction Training Program (OTIP)
- Recruit – No salary, weekly allowance plus paid accommodations and meals
- Online Training – 4 weeks
- Canada Border Service College – 14 weeks
- Recruit – No salary, weekly allowance plus paid accommodations and meals
- Officer Induction Development Program (OID Program)
- Unpaid - OITP graduation to OID Program – 2 weeks
- FB-02 Officer Trainee Salary - Development at port of entry – Approx. 12 to 18 months
- Graduate - FB-03 BSO Salary
What is CBSA's duty to accommodate
In 2016, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) completed arming its workforce at ports of entry and in intelligence and enforcement functions. CBSA officers perform a range of duties in support of the safety and security of Canada, and in most modes, carrying a duty firearm is a condition of their employment.
As a member of the core public administration, the CBSA addresses workplace issues in adherence to the Public Service Employment Act, the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act, and other relevant legislation. It develops related policies in alignment with collective agreements, jurisprudence, and Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada directives that apply across departments.
The Agency takes its responsibilities and obligations stemming from the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA), the Employment Equity Act, and the Accessible Canada Act very seriously. When someone can no longer be fully armed or meet the requirements of related job functions, the CBSA has a duty to accommodate them. The Agency also has a duty to spend taxpayer money wisely and to ensure that employees meet the essential requirements for positions which are classified, allocated, and funded on the assumption that they will be occupied by an armed officer supporting enforcement activities.
The duty to accommodate is a legal obligation to prevent or remove discriminatory impacts on employees based on protected grounds such as disability. It requires the CBSA to provide reasonable accommodations, which might include employment in a non-armed position.
The employer's obligation to accommodate stops when it becomes undue hardship, a threshold determined by factors including health, safety, and cost. The CBSA is not required to permanently exempt an employee from doing the essential duties of their position or create work that is not necessary. Additionally, accommodation measures are subject to periodic review.
An employee must cooperate with their employer's attempt to accommodate their needs, and rejecting a reasonable accommodation offer can bring employment to an end.
We are committed to working with employees requiring accommodations. The Accommodation page on Canada.ca provides additional information.
Please note that injury-on-duty leave is granted to border services officers in accordance with Article 37 of the Border Services (FB) Collective Agreement and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat's Injury-on-duty Leave Policy.
Will CBSA put officers at Valleyfield
Decisions relating to port infrastructure and supply chain fluidity are broader than CBSA – and rightly so. To that end, we work with Transport Canada, International Trade and others in the federal and provincial systems to determine how best to support trade goals.
In terms of ports, they provide data on their business modeling, source of their cargo and ability to make necessary investments in infrastructure for CBSA.
The Port of Valleyfield does not have a permanent CBSA officer presence. However, CBSA officers do currently travel to Valleyfield to provide services in line with the licenses that the port holds currently.
The Port of Valleyfield currently has a Commercial Vessel license, which allows them to import bulk goods and receive commercial vessels, not including international marine containers.
In addition, the Port of Valleyfield has a valid sufferance warehouse license, which allows for the importation of non-containerized cargo include: steel coils/plates, general cargo (project/industrial machinery/transformers), general cargo – bulk (bauxite) and pipes. CBSA officers to conduct examinations of commercial goods in their warehouse as needed.
On first port of arrival (FPOA)
The Canada Border Services Agency's resources are strategically allocated to respond to the threats and service needs at ports of entry, including shipping ports and rail yards.
Dedicated facilities for the examination of sea containers are already in operation in the country's five major seaports. These facilities have state-of-the-art tools and trained officers to enable the examination of imported goods and ensure that all requirements of program legislation are met, in order to protect the health, safety and security of Canadians.
Ensuring control of a commercial container port requires new infrastructure, Border Services Officers resources, detection technology/equipment and training to ensure the integrity of the program.
This includes radiation portals to screen all containers entering Canada. Following the events of , Canada and the United States signed the Container Security Initiative, which aims to detect and interdict terrorists, weapons of mass destruction, radiation threats, narcotics and other contraband arriving in marine containers as early as possible in the supply chain. U.S. Safe Ports Act mandates 100 percent screening by imaging and radiation detection for U.S.-bound marine containers.
As a result of this agreement, the CBSA screens all containers for radiation at its five marine ports, which represent 99% of all international container traffic into Canada.
Should Valleyfield seek to become a first port of arrival that can receive international marine containers, they would need to submit an application to the CBSA that includes a clear business case and meet all Government of Canada requirements, such as providing the CBSA with a Container Examination Facility.
What is the status of implementation of the border plan
- We have hired 30 Enforcement Case Officers to support removals
- The Border Action Plan includes 75 frontline resources:
- 33 frontline Border Services Officers (BSOs)
- 3 Detector Dog Services teams
- 12 regional laboratory chemists
- 7 Intelligence Officers
- 7 Criminal Investigators
- 6 Targeting Officers
- 7 engineers
- 33 Border Services Officers began their in-house training at the CBSA College in Rigaud on . They are expected to graduate . The 3 dog handlers are currently in training at the CBSA College and are expected to graduate on
- 2 engineers were hired this fiscal year and are currently supporting operations. The other 5 engineers, for a total of 7, will be hired in 2026–2027
- 4 chemists were hired this fiscal year and are currently supporting operations. The other 8 chemists, for a total of 12, will be hired in 2026–2027
- The remaining frontline resources will be deployed in future years as follows:
- 2026–2027:
- 7 intelligence officers
- 7 criminal investigators
- 6 targeting officers
- 2026–2027:
The investment plan has five pillars for specific action
| Border Plan Pillars | CBSA Elements |
|---|---|
| Detecting and disrupting the illegal fentanyl trade | Acquire new tools for the CBSA frontlines |
| Introducing significant new tools for law enforcement |
Amending the Customs Act to obligate industry partners to provide access to adequate accommodation and spaces when required to allow for the examination of exported goods by CBSA officers, while ensuring greater consistency between import and export requirements more generally. Implement a set of amendments to the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA), including increases to administrative and criminal penalties and other compliance tools. CBSA to finalize MOU with U.S. to enable the sharing of bulk trade data to detect and deter cross-border trade-based money laundering, and other crimes. |
| Improving operational coordination | Launch of the Joint Operational Intelligence cell which includes CBSA. |
| Expanding information sharing | Increase effective and efficient information sharing with the US by establishing new data repositories to enhance data collection and reporting. |
| Minimizing unnecessary border volumes |
|
All Border Action Plan commitments with respect to CTB
- In 2025–2026, the CBSA is deploying:
- 15 Raman devices
- 1 Regional Satellite Laboratory
- 3 Mobile Large-Scale Imaging devices
- 1 Pallet Large-Scale Imaging device
- 1 Fixed Large-Scale Imaging device
- 1 Small-Scale Imaging X-ray
- 33 Border Services Officers
- In 2026–2027, the CBSA plans to deploy:
- 30 Raman devices
- 2 Regional Satellite Laboratories
- 25 Ion Mobility Spectrometers
- 6 Mobile Large-Scale Imaging devices
- 3 Pallet Large-Scale Imaging devices
- Up to 6 Mobile Backscatter Imaging devices
- 10 Small-Scale Imaging X-rays
- 3 Detector Dog Services teams
- 12 chemists
- In fiscal year 2027–2028, the CBSA plans to deploy:
- 30 Raman devices
- 25 Ion Mobility Spectrometers
- 2 Pallet Large-Scale Imaging devices
- 14 Intelligence resources
- 6 Targeting Officers
- 3 Detector Dog Services teams
- In fiscal year 2028–2029, the CBSA plans to deploy:
- 25 Raman devices
- 3 Detector Dog Services teams
Planned Detection Technology deployments (all sources of funds) – multi-year table
Detection Technology acronym legend
- RAMAN: Hand-Held Raman Device
- RSL: Regional Satellite Labs
- IMS: Ion Mobility Spectrometer
- LSI*: Large Scale Imaging - Portal or Drive Thru
- M-LSI: Mobile Large Scale Imaging
- P-LSI: Pallet Large Scale Imaging
- F-LSI: Fixed Large Scale Imaging
- MBI: Mobile Backscatter Imaging
- CT Scan: Computed Tomography Scanner
- SSI X-ray: Small Scale Imaging (various types)
| ATL | QC | NOR | GTA | SOR | PRA | PAC | LAB | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAMAN | 1 | 3 | - | 4 | - | 2 | 4 | 1 | 15 |
| RSL | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| IMS | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| M-LSI | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 3 |
| P-LSI | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 |
| F-LSI | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
| MBI | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| CT Scan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| SSI Xray | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
| Total | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 22 |
| ATL | QC | NOR | GTA | SOR | PRA | PAC | LAB | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAMAN | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 30 |
| RSL | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 2 |
| IMS | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 25 |
| M-LSI | 1 | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | 2 | - | 6 |
| P-LSI | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 3 |
| F-LSI | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| MBI* | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | 2xTBC | 6 |
| CT Scan* | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | 3 | 2 | - | 9 |
| SSI Xray | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | 2 | - | 10 |
| Total | 9 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 9 | 91 |
| ATL | QC | NOR | GTA | SOR | PRA | PAC | LAB | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAMAN | 4 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 30 |
| RSL | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| IMS | Locations TBC | 25 | 25 | ||||||
| LSI* | *Potential pivot – research underway on drive thru portals (3) | 3 | |||||||
| P-LSI | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 |
| F-LSI | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| MBI** | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 4 |
| CT Scan | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 2 | - | 4 |
| SSI Xray | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 11 | 29 | 68 |
| ATL | QC | NOR | GTA | SOR | PRA | PAC | LAB | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAMAN | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 25 |
| RSL | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| IMS | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| Fumehood | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| LSI* | *Potential pivot – research underway on drive thru portals (4) | 4 | |||||||
| P-LSI | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| F-LSI | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| MBI | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| CT Scan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| SSI Xray | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 29 |
| ATL | QC | NOR | GTA | SOR | PRA | PAC | LAB | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M-LSI | 4 x M-LSI pivot to Portal in 2028–2029 | 4 | |||||||
| SSI | 10 x SSI rolling out in 2026–2027 | 10 | |||||||
| P-LSI | 1 x Pallet to roll out in 2027–2028 | 1 | |||||||
While these units were originally set to deploy in 2029–2030, we are to trying to expedite when possible and have planned to roll these deployments into earlier years. These have been flagged with highlight in the tables above. All previous timelines have reflected this schedule.
What has CBSA been doing about stolen vehicles
The Canada Border Services Agency works very closely with police of jurisdiction to identify and recover stolen vehicles.
To ensure the coordination of efforts and effective information sharing, we met with representatives for Police departments in judications heavily effected by vehicle theft 20 times over an 18 month span. I personally convened upwards of police chiefs monthly to take stock of our efforts.
The Canada Border Services Agency is an essential source of information for local law enforcement and the Canada Border Services Agency respond to 100% of the information requests received.
- The Canada Border Services Agency centralized the process of information requests and provided a single point of contact for Police of Jurisdictions to respond to an increased volume of requests of information from law enforcement partners
- In 2024, the Canada Border Services Agency processed 2,758 requests for information from the various Police of Jurisdictions
- So far in 2025, 2,598 requests have been processed
Canada Border Services Agency has also been part of Joint Intelligence Group and task forces in Ontario and Quebec over the last years focused on stolen vehicles. This collaboration has been exceptionally important and has helped drive our results:
- In 2024, the Canada Border Services Agency intercepted 2,277 stolen vehicles at various ports across the country
- As of , 1,220 vehicles have been intercepted since the beginning of the year
- These interceptions were largely driven by referrals form policing partners and the Canada Border Services Agency's intelligence driven targeting. This highlights the importance of strong partnerships and coordinated efforts between the Canada Border Services Agency, provincial and municipal police services, and other key stakeholders
- The Canada Border Services Agency is working closely with its partners to exchange on latest trends, and adjusting processes, as required
Figure 2 - Text version
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351 | 346 | 463 | 766 | 1,244 | 1,345 | 1,348 | 1,806 | 2,277 | 1,220 |
What does CBSA do to screen rail
CBSA risk assesses all goods, including plants and animals, and persons coming into the country. We take this responsibility very seriously.
In rail mode, like in other modes, carriers submit commercial information on their shipments crossing the border. Targeting officers refer high risk targets for examination by Border Services Officers. Frontline officers can conduct manual inspections or use available detection technology, such as x-ray imaging, to non-intrusively inspect high risk containers.
Background
Commercial rail serves as the cornerstone of Canada's transportation infrastructure, facilitating one-third of U.S. exports to Canada and generating over $31.5 billion in cross-border trade value, including substantial flows from Mexico via the United States.
In 2024–2025, 1.87 million rail cars entered Canada, processed through the CBSA's 28 designated Railway Depots and 97 inland warehouses.
Cargo process flow:
- Prior to the freight train arriving in Canada, the carrier submits Advance Commercial Information to the CBSA. The CBSA's National Targeting Centre has the ability to conduct a preliminary risk assessment of the goods
- At the land border, which is Rail's first point of arrival, the carrier reports its arrival, fulfilling its reporting requirements under Section 12 of the Customs Act. This triggers the commercial release of goods as long as commercial accounting declarations have been submitted and goods are not referred for examination or other government department review
- Train cars and cargo requiring examination for health, safety and security risks that cannot be examined at First Point of Arrival will move onwards to what's called the First Point of Operational Intervention—this is where the referred rail car is examined by BSOs.
- Rail cargo that has not been commercially released at the first point of arrival will move onwards to the port of final destination. Once the cargo arrives at the destination location, the warehouse operator transmits a warehouse arrival notification to the CBSA, triggering the commercial release or referral of the goods. Border Services Officers conduct commercial release processing and/or goods examination, including coordination with other government departments to ensure import requirements are met. Once complete, the goods are released to the importer
VP McCrorie regarding rail from the September 25 transcript
Caputo: what percentage of export containers are scanned at the border?
McCrorie: I couldn't give a breakdown of import vs. export, but I'd suggest around 1% to 2% of containers are examined. Need to distinguish between physically examined or scanned with x-rays, it's an important distinction; we use advance commercial information, whether inbound or outbound, and use a new targeting tool developed specifically in response to auto thefts which allows us to identify which containers should be subject to physical exam.
"The CBSA undertook additional work following the Summit thanks to special funding received, including the deployment of scanning technology in the Greater Toronto Area, or GTA, to improve our capacity to examine export-bound freight containers at intermodal facilities. …in the Toronto area rail yards, we deployed two scanners to look randomly for vehicles. We did 6,500 scans so far this year and have not found any stolen vehicles as a result of these."
"Not all cars that are stolen in Canada are bound for the export market… but we're seeing a decline in the number of vehicles we've intercepted at the border."
DeBellefeuille: In the National Action Plan to Combat Vehicle Theft, it says that new border services officers are to be hired to be deployed at ports, rail terminals, and intermodal facilities. The plan is one year old and will mark its first anniversary in . Mr. McCrorie, can you tell us exactly how many new officers have been deployed under the National Action Plan?
McCrorie: Very quickly, probably around 30 FTs have been hired, but the ones that really the 25 FTs that are operational. We had 10 new intelligence and targeting officers hired, and then 15 additional commercial exam officers hired to deploy to Montreal at the port, in the Toronto area rail yards, Port of Halifax and in the Port of Vancouver as well. They're in place…. We probably have on average 40 people working at the marine and rail examination centre at the Port of Montreal. With the additional resources another 6 were added.
How many asylum seekers have come to Canada through ports of entry in 2025
- Asylum claims in air: 9,351
- Asylum claims in land: 18,775
- Asylum claims between the ports of entry (based on people brought to CBSA by PoJ): 1,458
- This represents a 42% decrease in overall claims since last year
- The most claims were at the Lacolle port of entry – so far this year we have had approximately 13,695 claimants (an increase of 116% over last year)
All data is as of
Chart showing claims over last 5 calendar years (CBSA only)
Figure 3 - Text version
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13,052 | 64,551 | 72,841 | 59,441 | 28,840 |
What is CBSA doing about fentanyl
Over a year ago, I appointed a senior operational executive charged with coordinating our activities relating to opioids – from targeting to information sharing to collaboration with allies and Canadian police forces.
We continue this work in force, including through focused efforts, such as Operation Blizzard, where we dedicated resources over 4 weeks period and looked at 691,000 packages in air, postal, marine and land modes.
The results were: 67.5% of all seizures made were of illegal narcotics coming to Canada from the United States, while 17.5% were of narcotics going to the United States. These included:
- 116 fentanyl seizures (1.73 kg), intercepted in British Columbia, Québec and Alberta. Of these seizures, 1.44 kg were on route to the United States and 0.26 kg were destined to other countries
- 17 meth seizures (5.38 kg and 89 pills)
- 24 cocaine seizures (13 kg)
- 26 heroin seizures (0.19 kg)
- 17 opium seizures (38.84 kg and 11 bottles)
- 48 MDMA seizures (2.32 kg and 82 pills)
- 249 cannabis and cannabis related product seizures
The United States was the country of destination or origin for over 85% of all seizures made during the Operation.
| Export | Import | Grand total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| February | 131 | 16.5 | 147.5 |
| March | 1628.9 | 11.6 | 1640.5 |
| April | 378.35 | 0.1 | 378.45 |
| May | 141.1 | 0.25 | 141.35 |
| June | 17.8 | 27.29 | 45.09 |
| July | 176.8 | 61.8 | 238.6 |
| August | 5.2 | - | 5.2 |
| September | - | 1 | 1 |
| Grand total | 2479.15 | 118.54 | 2597.69 |
What happened with the IT outages
Beginning on , the CBSA experienced multiple outages to major IT systems that resulted in delays in travellers and commercial processing.
The CBSA works hard with its partners to ensure any IT systems outages are restored quickly.
A joint report of the findings was submitted, key causes were identified and a plan was put forward to better-prevent and mitigate future outages.
Budget 2025 has committed to reducing the cost of using and maintaining CBSA equipment and IT assets by decommissioning legacy software applications.
In the event of an outage, the CBSA makes every effort to ensure an adequate number of primary inspection lines are open, while at the same time maintaining normal operations such as customs and immigration services, secondary examinations, enforcement activities, and commercial processing.
Throughout an outage, the CBSA collaborates closely with airport and bridge authorities to facilitate the flow of travellers and commercial goods.
Safety and security standards are upheld at all times, with border services officers working to verify travellers' identities, receive their declarations, and conduct any additional screening warranted by each traveller's individual circumstances. The CBSA works closely with airport management to expedite traveller processing, minimize delays, and complete verifications as required.
The CBSA has a System Outage Contingency Plan that was developed in partnership with industry. The plan outlines requirements for reporting commercial transactions during an outage. It also provides guidance on the electronic submission of data once the system is back online. The CBSA accepts paper documentation during an outage and waives Administrative Monetary Penalties for Advance Commercial Information related infractions resulting from the outage.
In the event of an outage of airport Primary Inspection Kiosks, travellers are re-directed to the primary inspection lines for manual processing.
As requested by the Minister of Public Safety, the CBSA and SSC provided a report to their respective Ministers within 30 days of the late September outages. The CBSA and SSC closely examined the key causes of the outages and have developed a plan to prevent and mitigate future outages.
CBSA/SSC Plan includes:
- quality controls related to key IT changes
- collaboration between CBSA, SSC and air industry and trade chain partners in planning I changes
- communications with industry partners
- awareness of real world business impacts resulting from a an outage of CBSA systems
- integration of IT change and incident management among government and industry partners
- operational protocols used at ports of entry when an system outage occurs
10 point plan
- Complete root cause analyses of all three incidents and apply recommendations and lessons learned
- Shared Services Canada (SSC) and the CBSA have completed a joint investigation
- Establish joint IT change management committee with CBSA, SSC and air industry partners
- Launch weekly change planning meetings with industry partners, starting the week of Oct. 20 with all airport authority CIO teams. Expand subsequently to domestic airlines, and then establish same with trade chain partners
- Publish weekly forward schedule of changes to our industry partners
- Strengthen existing CIO-level engagement with air industry partners
- Establish CIO-level engagement with commercial and trade partners
- Improve CBSA and SSC change and incident management
- Integrate incident change and management processes between the CBSA and SSC (immediately)
- Establish CIO approval of all changes impacting the CBSA (immediately) and inform CBSA President and Shared Services Canada Deputy Head in advance of all changes
- Ensure that all CBSA services, systems and applications, and their infrastructure dependencies are well-documented and understood (including certificate expiry dates)
- Conduct joint audit of IT Change Management and Incident Management by CBSA and SSC Chief Audit Executives, to evaluate effectiveness and make recommendations for improvement
- Improve industry partner communications and engagement channels and protocols
- Document and enhance all industry partner communication processes and protocols regarding IT changes and incidents within the CBSA and between the CBSA and its industry partners
- Review and strengthen the quality of messages to industry partners
- Review and adjust active (live) communications tools such as MS Teams to ensure operational effectiveness during incidents
- Review and bolster the CBSA's IT systems and IT infrastructure hosted by SSC
- SSC with CBSA to review the IT infrastructure that supports the CBSA's systems and applications and develop a plan to strengthen it, improve resiliency to changes and incidents
- SSC and CBSA to improve automated monitoring of key systems and alerting of issues
- CBSA and SSC to thoroughly review the CBSA's IT systems and applications that underpin key services and inter-operations with industry partners to determine ways to improve resiliency to changes and incidents
- Adjust the Agency's Investment Plan to prioritise technical debt reduction
- Ensure that areas of aging systems and technologies are clearly identified for renewal in the CBSA's IT Investment Plan
- Adjust the Agency's crisis/emergency management plan and procedures based on recent events
- Review CBSA and IT branch crisis management plans and procedures to ensure that experiences and lessons from these incidents are incorporated
- Conduct table-top exercises to test the Agency's readiness for future major IT outages
- Improve the Agency's outage protocols and business continuity plans to better prepare for digital disruption
- Review Travellers program outage protocols to:
- Reinforce best practices for CBSA operations and airports to manage during PIK outages and ensure consistency across regions, airlines to manage during Interactive Advance Passenger Information/Passenger Protect Program outages
- Revisit and update outage protocols procedures to continue traveller processing during IT outages
- Revisit and update airport/airline procedures for to ensure alignment with CBSA processes/requirements
- Ensure that all BCP documentation is up-to-date and available
- Review Commercial program outage protocols and business continuity plans to incorporate best practices and innovations found during these incidents and harmonise across regions
- Review intelligence business continuity plans and adjust for any gaps found related to IT system outages, if required
- Review Travellers program outage protocols to:
- Review federal government stakeholder communication protocols to increase broad awareness
- Building on recent updates to the communication protocols, examine means of engaging and updating GC partners regarding significant CBSA incidents, outages and events, and revise or strengthen where required
What is in the new bill that relates to CBSA
The changes to the bill include removals of the following sections. All other previous provisions remain:
- Canada Post amendments (entirety of Bill C-2's Part 4)
- Prohibition on large cash transactions (entirety of Bill C-2's Part 11)
- Lawful access basic and subscriber information provisions (entirety of Bill C-2's Part 14)
- Supporting Authorized Access to Information Act (entirety of Bill C-2's Part 15)
- Safe harbour provisions (entirety of Bill C-2's Part 16)
The following CBSA provisions are included in the new bill and mirror what was included in C-2:
Requirements for owners and operators provide space and infrastructure for the CBSA to do export examinations
The proposed amendments to the Customs Act will bring facilities obligations in line with the creation of the Agency and its current mandate while aligning with the powers with respect to exported goods provided through amendments to the Customs Act in 2018.
These amendments will align the facilities obligations with export authorities authorizes that already exist in the Customs Act.
The proposed amendments will mirror obligations that already exist for imported goods, such as infrastructure or facilities to conduct export exams, and require transporters and warehouse operators to allow access to premises under their control for the examination of goods destined for export.
- Amendments will obligate owners and operators at certain ports of entry/exit to provide, equip and maintain facilities free of charge for any purpose related to the administration and enforcement of the CBSA's mandate, which includes the examination and detention of goods destined for export
- Amendments will give the CBSA access to spaces further away from the port of entry/exit. The most effective place to perform export searches is at transportation hubs where containers are gathered, such as rail yards and warehouses before they reach a port. Performing export examinations at transportation hubs would reduce bottlenecks at busy ports of entry/exit and would respond to industry requests to perform CBSA services at warehouses located inland. This provision will mirror current obligations for goods destined for import
It is important to be clear that we currently conduct export exams in all modes and owners and operators have been good partners.
The proposed amendments would not significantly broaden the scope of what is already being provided to the CBSA by port owner/operators, transporters and sufferance warehouse operators with respect to imported goods.
Rather, they are intended to align import and export requirements to ensure greater consistency and would provide additional clarity regarding expectations for those locations in order for the CBSA to carry out export-related functions, including infrastructure considerations should those groups seek to expand or create new locations.
Other elements of the bill will help improve the CBSA's work relating to asylum seekers
Two new ineligibilities would be created making claims meeting those conditions ineligible to be referred to the Immigration and Refugee Board and help Canada better manage access to the refugee system.
- The first new ineligibility would apply if a claimant entered Canada one year before making a refugee claim. This ineligibility will apply only if the first entry into Canada was made on or after (when entry-exit records began)
- The second applies if a claimant entered Canada irregularly from the United States and made a claim after the 14-day time limit passed under the application of the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA). Currently the STCA only applies if the claim is made within 14 days of entry
- In both cases, asylum seekers would still be eligible to apply for a pre-removal risk assessments to respect the principle of non-refoulement (international principle whereby countries cannot remove someone to a place where their life or freedoms would be in jeopardy)
- It is expected that most of these claims will be made at IRCC offices; however, some claims may be made through CBSA at ports of entry
The proposed new authorization for the appointment of representatives to assist minors or those who cannot understand proceeding at both the CBSA and IRCC will promote fairness throughout the whole asylum process. Currently, only the Immigration and Refugee Board has this authority at its hearings. Appointed representatives will be beneficial in CBSA removal proceedings to ensure the foreign national has support to fully participate in the process.
The bill proposes that removal orders will come into force the same day as when a refugee claim is withdrawn allowing the CBSA to enforce removal orders immediately for persons who withdrew their claim and wish to leave Canada. Currently officers need to wait 15 days.
The bill also seeks to introduce a new requirement that admissibility hearings and refugee claim hearings can only be held at the Immigration and Refugee Board if the person is present in Canada. CBSA interventions in hearings would therefore, be for individuals in the country and not abroad, which is consistent with the perspective that the asylum system provides protection for persons in Canada.
Finally, the bill would also create provisions to specify that various information and documents required to support a refugee claim are provided before the Immigration and Refugee Board hearing. This will support the CBSA's ability to conduct security screening and investigate potential inadmissibilities. Currently, a claim is referred as soon as the initial eligibility decision is made. The proposed Minister's Due Diligence provisions will establish a period of time before the referral to the Immigration and Refugee Board can take place to ensure the collection and review of materials.
- As claims will be pending Minister's Due Diligence, additional provisions will address when claimants fail to meet requirements in order to start abandonment of a claim before referral and to also allow CBSA or IRCC officials to accept withdrawals of refugee claims before referral
- Additional improvements include provisions to consolidate all the required documents into one single application online for consistency regardless of whether the claim is made at inland IRCC offices or CBSA ports of entry
Annex A: Bill C-12 - Strengthening Canada's Immigration System and Borders Act
Will be verified against the transcript.
- Unless specified in the table below, the clause was carried unamended
- Totals:
- Adopted: 18
- Defeated: 28
- Inadmissible: 11
- Not moved: 7
- Removals related
| Part/ Clause/ Section | Motion # | Proposed amendment | Result | Lead Department Analysis on Implications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ref.: 13765140 Clause 4 |
BQ – 1 |
That Bill C-12, in Clause 4, be amended by adding after line 30 on page 2 the following: |
Adopted |
Customs
|
Ref.: 13766523 Clause 39 |
CPC-7 |
That Bill C-12, in Clause 39, be amended by adding after line 23 on page 18 the following: |
Adopted (sub amendment to change to quarterly was defeated) |
PS Minister Removals to review (Anders SPB lead) Coming into force – Royal Assent Description of Amendment: adds a monthly reporting requirement for the Minister of Public Safety in relation to removal orders issued under the IRPA. In addition to the requirement to report, the proposed amendment details the information that must be included in a report and further requires the monthly reports to be tabled in Parliament. Implications: CBSA was previously willing to accept much of the previous text, will remain monthly report and tabling, not annually or quarterly. Previously sought to replace criminal background with inadmissibility. And sought to remove reasons for delays. The CBSA will provide monthly reporting but it should be noted that the monthly report tabled will not reflect all the removals enforced in the month due to time lags for the confirmation of certain types of departures. Given the frequency and additional factors to be produced there may be an increased possibility of identity being revealed. The normal mitigation to this of redacting small numbers would not be available. As the reporting is authorized by law, then 8(2)(b) of the Privacy Act authorizes its disclosure. No vetting, or other instruments are required. Would require an amendment to the law if, despite the authority to do so pursuant to para. 8(2)(a) of the Privacy Act, there was a desire to apply redactions to avoid the possibility of disclosing any personal information. |
Ref.: 13766522 New Clause 39.1 |
CPC-8 |
That Bill C-12 be amended by adding after line 23 on page 18 the following new clause: 55 (1) An officer must issue a warrant for the arrest and detention of a permanent resident or a foreign national who the officer has reasonable grounds to believe is inadmissible and is a danger to the public or is unlikely to appear for examination, for an admissibility hearing, for removal from Canada or at a proceeding that could lead to the making of a removal order by the Minister under subsection 44(2)." |
Adopted (Decision of inadmissibility overturned by vote) |
SPB lead Christy/Investigations Subsection 55(1) currently provides that an officer "may" issue a warrant in the specific circumstances provided for in that section. The amendment changed the "may" to "must", thereby removing officer discretion. However, this discretion is not unlimited. Once they form an opinion under subsection (A55(1)), the officer cannot disregard the fact that a permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible and is a danger to the public or is unlikely to appear for an immigration proceeding, such as an examination, an admissibility hearing, or a removal from Canada. Rather, discretion under A55(1) is necessary in order to provide CBSA flexibility in managing warrant cases where the objectives of the Act, including those related to public safety, would not be achieved by the issuance of a warrant. This would include cases relating to the issuance of warrants against:
Current GOC policy mandates that officers should identify vulnerable persons at the earliest opportunity in order to ensure that appropriate accommodations are made, and any relevant considerations are factored into decisions and actions taken. It is expected that where possible, vulnerable persons are prevented from becoming traumatized or re-traumatized during the immigration process. By taking away officer's discretion, the issuance of warrants to this population would be problematic. Minors IRPA (s. 60) states that minor child shall be detained only as a measure of last resort. The express wording of this new amendment would seem to require warrants be issued against minors whenever the s. 55(1) criteria are met. This may conflict with the principles of IRPA, given that the execution of the warrant necessarily results in arrest and detention. Subsection 55(1) applies to foreign nationals and permanent residents and makes no distinction between minors and adults. Additionally, a number of operational impacts would result from the automatic issuance of warrants against minors, given their inability to understand the nature of proceedings against them and their lack of legal agency to make decisions or be subject to IRPA conditions related to compliance. If and when Alternatives To Detention are considered, for example, release from detention upon execution of the warrant, minors would not be able to sign/understand release conditions or reporting in person. Given that minors cannot act on their own behalf in IRPA proceedings and are considered vulnerable persons, unless they are accompanied by a parent or guardian, a designated representative would need to be appointed and engaged with provincial child protection services. Of particular concern is that this amendment conflicts with section 60 of the IRPA which outlines that minors shall only be detained as a measure of last resort, taking into account the applicable criteria and grounds for detention. Given that IRPA warrants are generally sent to the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC), engagement with the RCMP CPIC will be required to determine system and legislative authority to include warrants for minors, given that the current provision re: criminal information on minors is governed by the Youth Criminal Justice Act and only for minors between the ages of 12 and 18. Detention Detention capacity would inevitably be a consideration as an effect of this change in wording. An increase in warrant issuance will have a trickle effect on other program, including Detentions (detention capacity, services, etc.) and Hearings (as more detention review at the ID are anticipated). Finally, the use of discretion ensures some flexibility to avoid issuing warrants in cases where removal is not possible, such as when there is legislative or regulatory stay of removal that is likely to last several months or longer, which is consistent with jurisprudence that has established that immigration detention must be incidental to a valid immigration purpose: often removal. This process would not only have a significant operational impact on CBSA officers conducting immigration investigations and managing warrants, but also on police partners who will have to deal with these cases. By focusing on these additional cases, the Agency will have to divert limited officer resources from higher priority cases, resulting in fewer new investigations into serious inadmissibilities and fewer arrests of higher risk individuals. |
Ref.: 13750719 New Clause 39.1 |
CPC-13 |
That Bill C-12 be amended by adding after line 23 on page 18 the following new clause: |
Adopted (Decision of inadmissibility overturned by vote) |
SPB lead- Jamison Description of Amendment: Section 78 currently provides that a judge will determine whether a certificate is reasonable and shall quash a certificate if s/he determines it is not. While there is no fixed deadline currently imposed on the judge's determination of reasonableness, para. 83(1)(a) of the Act does currently require the Federal Court (FC) to deal with certificate proceedings "as informally and expeditiously as the circumstances and considerations of fairness and natural justice permit". CPC-13 seeks to impose a specific timeline on the judge's determination. Specifically, CPC-13 would amend section 78 to provide that a judge must determine whether a certificate is reasonable within 30 days of referral for priority cases or within 60 days of referral for all other cases. Implications: Since 1991, only 27 individuals have been subject to certificate proceedings. In these proceedings, the judge would need to hear the person named before ruling on the certificate and the individual may also call witnesses to testify in his/her defense. The judge must also appoint a special advocate that protects the interests of the named person in the closed portions of the hearings on the reasonableness of the security certificate. [REDACTED] |
Ref.: 13749220 New Clause 39.1 |
CPC-14 |
That Bill C-12 be amended by adding after line 23 on page 18 the following new clause: |
Adopted (Decision of inadmissibility overturned by vote) |
SPB lead - Jamison Description of Amendment: Section 81 currently provides that the Minister of Public Safety and Minister of IRCC may jointly issue a warrant in the specific circumstances provided for in that section. The proposal seeks to change "may" to "must." These individuals were released from detention by the courts over 10 years ago on strict conditions. In these cases, a literal interpretation of the provision as worded may result in absurdities, given the court ordered their release long ago, but Ministers are of the view that the individuals still pose a danger to national security. |
Ref.: 13751545 New Clause 39.1 |
CPC-15 |
That Bill C-12 be amended by adding after line 23 on page 18 the following new clause: |
Adopted (with sub-amendment) |
PS Minister Anders/Jamison/Christy Coming into force – Royal Assent Reporting on warrants for security certificates and detentions is unlikely to have any operational impact, given the low number of cases. Currently, there are only two cases and both individuals have been released on conditions for over 10 years. With respect to proposed amendment (d): The proposed amendment creates a new reporting requirement under IRPA s.94 in the Annual Report to Parliament on cancellations and variance, as well as the percentage of those cancelled or varied who subsequently departed Canada. As written, the amendment scopes in all cancellation activities, including those that fall outside the scope of Bill C-12's amendments. The document control authorities within Bill C-12 are specific to immigration documents, and the cancellation of a document does not result in a loss of status for persons in Canada or the issuance of a removal order. Therefore, a foreign national's subsequent departure (or removal) from Canada is not be directly linked to a document cancellation or variance. The policy intent is for all in Canada inadmissibility processes continue to be required (i.e. inadmissibility reports, Minister's Delegate review, and admissibility hearing, if required). Subsequently a removal order may be issued. [REDACTED] While the Canada Border Services Agency may question anyone leaving Canada, Canada's outbound border control does not systematically require all exiting travelers to confirm their departure or to present to an officer for examination in the same way that they must when entering. Therefore, the reporting on the departures (or removals) is not feasible as the removal information is not matched to document cancellation. |
Ref.: 13766531 Clause 47 Pages 21 and 22 |
CPC-21 |
That Bill C-12, in Clause 47, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 21 to line 6 on page 22 with the following: |
Adopted |
IRCC Minister (Anders file) - Hearings to review Would end the requirement for the IRB (RPD and RAD) to hold a hearing on abandonment, rather must abandon in person not physically in Canada and return to country of origin. There are a number of practical questions about the text of this amendment. It is unclear what is meant by new claim vs ongoing claim – will the RPD be limited from applying the provision (b) for new referrals? How will ongoing be defined? CBSA may encounter returning claimants whose CBSA or IRCC claim has been abandoned and who are subject to an in force removal order. Depending on the timeframe in relation to the 12 month Pre-Referral Removal Assessment (PRRA) bar, these cases may be removed immediately or directed to removals. While the RPD would be obligated to abandon a claim if the claimant is outside of country of origin, though may require an admission or some sort of proof to determine that the person has returned to his or her country of origin. |
Why are you making small businesses get a CARM account
The CBSA Assessment and Revenue Management (CARM) is a new system for importers, designed to facilitate the collection of duties and taxes for commercial goods imported into Canada, which successfully came on line last year. With its launch, CARM became the official system of record for the collection of duties and taxes for commercial goods imported into Canada.
Those who seek to import goods into Canada need to register in CARM. When they do, they are able to use an online self-service tool to see their account, register for various CBSA programs, receive notifications, provide the CBSA with supporting documents, view account statements, make payments, and perform other activities.
Importers are also provided the opportunity to either pay their duties and taxes at the time of release when their goods enter the country or enroll in the release prior to payment (RPP) program and post financial security, which allows them to defer payment of duties and taxes.
When CARM was launched, the CBSA also implemented regulatory amendments to require all importers (regardless of size) to post financial security rather than the broker posting security on their behalf, which was the previous practice. Once importers are enrolled in CARM, they can delegate day-to-day business to their customs broker. Small businesses still have the option to pay duties and taxes upon entry into Canada, but if they want the privilege to defer payment of duties and taxes, they are required to enroll in the release prior to payment program and post financial security.
The rationale for this is simple. With the broker-based security model, the CBSA had difficulty collecting on delinquent accounts and as such, had to write off debts for duties owing and in many cases, had limited to no recourse to collect on broker bonds. The regulatory changes to the Release Prior to Payment model that were introduced with CARM are designed to clarify and strengthen the accountability for the payment of duties and taxes owing. The intent is to reduce bad debt write-off by holding the importer and not the third party agent or customs broker responsible for any outstanding debt.
Currently, over 191,000 importers have enrolled in the CARM client portal and the volume of RPP enrollment represents 98.52% of the total release volume.
Infrequent importers, who import only a few times per year, represent a slower enrollment rate as these importers may be seasonal or may never import again and will have no need to register in CARM or release prior to payment. A portion of these infrequent importers are also non resident importers, based in other countries, and may be less aware of CARM and the release prior to payment program, which is why we are amplifying our outreach to spread awareness. Nonetheless, the CBSA continues to see a trend of small businesses enrollment increasing daily.
We understand that for some small businesses that import a few times a year, it may be more challenging to transition to CARM and post financial security. As such, we have worked with them to provide flexibility:
- Provided a 210-day transition period that gave importers the time to post their financial security
- Offered specific transition measures for a one year period, which have just been extended until or longer, to allow for the use of a broker's financial security for first time and one time importers and those who are in the process of registering in CARM and for release prior to payment
- Offered contingency measures that allowed brokers to use their financial security for time-sensitive and perishable products, as well as goods that contribute to an individual's health and well being
- Increased engagement efforts with a focus on small importers
- Offered help-desk services by phone and by webform to help clients enroll in CARM and a dedicated line for brokers who are helping their client register in CARM
Frequent user feedback and steps to improve
CARM challenges for importers
Frequent feedback received from the trade community on CARM falls into the following categories. A number of steps have been taken to improve where possible.
Challenge 1: CARM client portal business account creation (in other words, onboarding)
Description:
CARM requires businesses to register for their CARM account in order to proceed with activities such as delegation of authority or enrolment in Release Prior to Payment. Steps to account creation require access to information that is often challenging particularly for small businesses due to a number of factors:
- Legal entity name and/or address not up to date with CRA
- Financial transactional information required to authenticate account not available, or not understood – resulting in helpdesk request for assistance
October 1 updates
- 6 webinars held in September, 41% attendance rate (171 registered, 72 attended) – total webinars since May 20 is 54
- October webinar dates being confirmed – planning carrier-specific, a webinar specific to the annual financial security review and what actions need to be taken
- Onboarding assistance remains highest topic of support; average number of calls received per day in September was 512 calls
- Onboarding requests via webform continue to be processed in less than 5 business days (as of October 1, 2:30pm: 93 requests in the queue, oldest is from September 25)
- CTB and Corporate Communications working towards bringing Guide to importing commercial goods into Canada: Step 1. Preparing to import up to date. Once updated, it will be included in updates via web, social media, other communications
- User Guides continue to be updated to provide clarity on steps and bulletins published to share information – 28 user guides updated with the September 27/28 release, including the changes applicable to the credit card limit
- (ongoing) Continued improvements to CBSA website for CARM-related information
- CTB/Corporate Communications working with ISED to include CARM in their communication products and channels. Targeting the next available spot in their GCInsights newsletter (December 2) and exploring their other communication tools
November 7 updates
- No webinars were held in October, 14 webinars upcoming for November and December
- Issued guidance for Annual Financial Security, including bulletin and question and answer document
- Onboarding remains top request for assistance, turnaround time for webform requests has improved to 2 days or less
- Average of 437 calls received per day in October
- Average of 327 webforms received per day in October
- Due to Restricted Change Window, no October portal maintenance releases were performed, therefore no new fixes/improvements or user guides published
Challenge 2: Helpdesk volumes and wait times
Description:
Helpdesk volumes remain high, particularly for onboarding and Release Prior to Payment assistance. Trade community callers are experiencing extended wait times on phone and webform responses.
October 1 updates
- Telephone and webform assistance requests continue to decline; month-over-month stats are provided at end of document
- Average wait time for September: 26 minutes (down from 36 minutes in August, 43 minutes in July, 66 minutes in June)
- Telephone response rate for September was 62% (up from 53% in August, 49% in July and 39% in June)
- Number of onboarded businesses per week continues to decline. As of September 26, over 194,468 registered businesses, with average of 1551 businesses onboarded per week in September (slightly up from 1538 per week in August, down from 1809 per week in July and 1965 per week in June)
- Implemented : on the BIS line, moved CARM down in the list of options and "Commercial importing" option to the forefront to aid in reducing calls coming to CARM for topics that BIS should be addressing
- Implemented : Improvements to BIS and CARM sections of CBSA webpage to clarify which area to contact for what topics
- Upcoming, date TBD dependent on Bell (telephony vendor): Pending telephone line changes to operate in a 8-4 local time capacity, with goal of better management of call volumes and distribution (this is how BIS line operates, making change to CARM options)
November 7 updates
- Telephone and webform assistance requests continue to decline; month-over-month stats are provided at end of document
- Average telephone wait time for October: 31 minutes (up from 26 in September, down from 36 minutes in August, 43 minutes in July, 66 minutes in June)
- Telephone response rate for October was 60% (down from 62% in September, up from 53% in August, 49% in July and 39% in June)
- Increase in calls and webforms this month are partly attributable to the RPP/Financial Security Annual Review, which generated new lines of questions to the helpdesk
- As of November 7, over 203,813 registered businesses, with average of 1586 businesses onboarded per week in October. Number of business onboarded per week remains stable at around 1540 new businesses onboarding per week since August (1551 per week in September, 1538 per week in August)
- Implemented time zone changes as of October 14. Service offering is 8am to 4pm local time based on time zone of caller (Canada and US). This is consistent with BIS line
Challenge 3: External clients become unable to access previously created account
Description:
Helpdesk assistance is often required when:
- Users who onboarded following Release 1 (in other words, early adopters) fall into the category of 24+ months of inactivity, where GCKey service has a system rule that deactivates the key. Helpdesk needs to perform a profile switch
- Users forget username/password and either do not attempt recovery or erroneously revoke their existing key
- Business Account Manager (BAM) changes, for example previous BAM leaves company without reassigning role to a new BAM
October 1 updates
- The number of BAM switches requested per month continues to decrease: 82 in September, down from 105 in August
- Discussions are ongoing with Deloitte regarding impact and cost for BAM switches
November 7 updates
- The number of BAM switches requested per month continues to decrease: 65 in October, down from 82 in September and 105 in August
- Deloitte impact and cost for building functionality for CBSA to perform BAM switches has been received at $184,500. Considering this cost estimate and continued expected decreases in BAM requests, coupled with other priority change items, this is not being pursued at this time
Challenge 4: Language used in CARM
Description:
Feedback from small businesses is that the language used in the CARM Portal is not clear or intuitive.
October updates
- Changes implemented as of September 28
Challenge 5: Users with multiple businesses
Description:
The portal has been designed to operate by the principle of one user/login credential per business, which requires users who operate more than one business to have separate login credentials for each business.
October update
- Not currently pursuing
Monthly statistics
| June | July | August | September | Octobber | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calls received | 13,390 | 14,650 | 9,323 | 9,746 | 10,057 |
| Calls answered | 5,216 | 7,181 | 4,969 | 6,052 | 5,986 |
| Average wait time (minutes) | 66 | 43 | 36 | 26 | 31 |
| Answer rate | 39% | 49% | 53% | 62% | 60% |
| Cases opened | 10,645 | 9,786 | 6,554 | 5,751 | 7,541 |
| Cases closed | 8,845 | 10,896 | 8,927 | 7,686 | 10,234 |
| Case increase/decrease | 1,800 | minus1,110 | minus2,373 | minus1,935 | minus2,693 |
What is CBSA doing about firearms
The CBSA's firearms strategy is focused on the identification, interdiction, and regulatory enforcement of firearms. This includes denying entry of illegal firearms or firearm parts into Canada. The CBSA also criminally prosecutes firearms smugglers and where they are not Canadian, denies them entry to or removes them from Canada.
Over a year ago, I appointed a senior operational official responsible for firearms. Her mandate is to make sure our many activities in CBSA were linked up, that we were engaging with police forces and that police forces were aware of CBSA's considerable authorities in this space and actively engages with US counterparts to improve timely information sharing. She also works with other federal agencies (RCMP and PS) to advance efforts to strengthen policy and legislation impacting enforcement at and beyond the border.
The CBSA has established three Integrated Firearms Enforcement Teams (The Ontario Firearms smuggling Enforcement Team (OFSET), The Prairie Integrated Firearms Enforcement Team (IFET) and the Québec Weapons Smuggling Integrated Enforcement Team (WSIET). The teams are composed of criminal investigators, intelligence officers, and firearms intelligence analysts. These cross-functional teams investigate, arrest and prosecute firearms smugglers.
Recognizing the threat of privately manufactured firearms (aka PMF's or ghost guns), the CBSA's has also bolstered efforts to target and interdict firearm parts arriving at the border by:
- Coordinating national intelligence through the National Targeting Center, the Firearms Intelligence Desk and, Regional Intelligence field offices
- Increasing the number of search warrants executed by our criminal investigators across the country to stop the proliferation of PMFs in Canadian communities
- Educating front line officers on concealment trends and risk indicators f both firearms and the parts that are used to manufacture firearms
- Utilizing and continuing to invest in detection technologies capacity (such as handheld devices, small scale and large-scale X-ray machines, and detector dogs)
In addition to CBSA independent efforts, we work alongside domestic and international law enforcement partners, such as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), other Canadian police agencies, and the U.S government (U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Homeland Security Investigations, and the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) in joint efforts to prevent and prohibit those who engage in criminal activity from entering Canada.
- Example of these efforts includes: tracing all eligible firearms seized through an information sharing Memorandum of Understanding with the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). This allows the CBSA and our US counterparts to investigate those engaging in firearms smuggling
- Sharing near-real time information on border seizures with the RCMP and US to support the identification of trends and persons engaged in firearm smuggling activities
- In 2024, the CBSA seized over 930 firearms and 17,200 prohibited weapons. 90 percent of all firearms seized at our border coming into Canada came from the U.S.
- Between 2020 and 2024, 3,295 firearms seized at our border came from the U.S.
| Export | Import | Grand total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 1 | 54 | 55 |
| February | - | 44 | 44 |
| March | 2 | 49 | 51 |
| April | 1 | 58 | 59 |
| May | 2 | 85 | 87 |
| June | - | 89 | 89 |
| July | 1 | 99 | 100 |
| August | 1 | 103 | 104 |
| September | - | 99 | 99 |
| Grand total | 8 | 680 | 688 |
What happened to the 600 foreign nationals
- That is not a stock. Individuals come into our removals inventory and CBSA removes people all the time. Last year, we removed 18,000 individuals – the highest in 10 years and we are on track to exceed a commitment to remove 20,000 people this year
- But let me explain the 599 you are referring to. They are people who have been charged with and/or served sentences for criminality, ranging from theft to murder. Of course the 19 people who have served sentences for the most serious offenses are CBSA's priorities
- We actively work with police forces from across the country to track these individuals down
- Last year, we closed 542 immigration warrants involving criminals – 254 so far this year. We also removed 905 individuals inadmissible for criminality, organized criminality and security
- Last month, we removed 77 people with criminality from Canada
- I don't want to minimize this but it important context – almost 50% of the people in the number you cite were involved in non-violent, more minor offenses
- We are looking for everybody and every day we are finding people and removing them
Breakdown of criminality:
| OffencesTablenote 1 | Count |
|---|---|
| Murder, Attempted Murder, Manslaughter | 19 |
| Weapons Offences | 70 |
| Narcotics Offences | 71 |
| Assault-related Offences | 96 |
| Sex Offences | 51 |
| DUIs | 88 |
| Other types of offencesTablenote 2 | 204 |
| Total | 599 |
Current Status (This is a snapshot in time, there is continual movement of cases in and out of this inventory.)
| Count | |
|---|---|
| Initial Count | 599 |
| Warrants closedTablenote 1 | 41 |
| Removed by the CBSA | 12 |
| Departures confirmed by the CBSA | 2 |
| In criminal detention (serving a sentence)Tablenote 2 | 61 |
| The remainder subject to an active immigration arrest warrant and that are not presently in custody | 497Tablenote 3 |
Removals by region
The CBSA collects removal data for all of Canada and organizes the data according to 7 regions.
| Region | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 Q1 | 2025 Q2 | 2025 Q3 | 2025 Q4Tablenote 1 | 2025 TotalTablenote 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic | 139 | 57 | 69 | 60 | 104 | 158 | 49 | 59 | 25 | 15 | 148 |
| Quebec | 2,633 | 5,920 | 1,592 | 2,487 | 6,021 | 6,947 | 2,352 | 2,188 | 3,405 | 505 | 8,450 |
| Northern Ontario | 386 | 284 | 234 | 294 | 410 | 489 | 123 | 159 | 130 | 43 | 455 |
| Greater Toronto Area | 4,343 | 4,499 | 3,655 | 2,714 | 4,304 | 5,402 | 1,859 | 1,880 | 1,699 | 409 | 5,847 |
| Southern Ontario | 898 | 204 | 304 | 698 | 1,346 | 1,075 | 294 | 247 | 250 | 68 | 859 |
| Prairie | 967 | 966 | 830 | 588 | 770 | 1,112 | 375 | 338 | 439 | 94 | 1,246 |
| Pacific | 1,903 | 921 | 829 | 1,478 | 2,252 | 2,174 | 602 | 529 | 530 | 119 | 1,780 |
| Grand total | 11,269 | 12,851 | 7,513 | 8,319 | 15,207 | 17,357 | 5,654 | 5,400 | 6,478 | 1,253 | 18,785 |
CBSA stats and facts
2025 Stats and Figures January 1 to
Budget – A and B base (source of info: 2025–2026 Main Estimates)
2025–2026 CBSA budget:
- A-Base (Ongoing) funding: $1,983 million
- B-Base (Temporary) funding: $729 million
- Statutory (Employee Benefit Plan) $281 million
- Total Budget: $2,993 million
FTEs – uniformed, operational and support
Approximately 17,000 employees
over 8,500 front line
1,200 ports of entry and in 36 countries.
Ports of entry – air, land, marine
- 117 land-border crossings – 61 on a 24/7 basis
- 13 international airports – 10 on a 24/7 basis
- 27 rail sites
- 3 Major Ports (Halifax, Montréal and Vancouver) numerous marinas and reporting stations
IT Contracts – number and amount and decrease over past years (source of info: Q1 report to TBS)
36 IT consultants as of , compared to 250 in .
The reduction in consultants reflects the CBSA's steady decline in overall contract use. The amount of active contracts has reduced by 55% between and from 2275 to 1027.
Executives
- 44% of VPs/RDGs have served on the frontline (8 out of 18)
- 35.7% of the Executive cadre (at all levels) worked on the frontline directly supporting the CBSA mandate at some point in their career (91 out of 255)
- 48.2% of the Executive cadre (at all levels) have either worked directly on the frontline and/or occupied a role that required supervision of frontline employees (123 out of 255)
- 66% of VPs and RDGs are women (12 out of 18)
Travellers in 2025 (to )
- 70,445,632 travellers:
- Air: 31,131,262
- Highway: 35,871,858
- including 4,691,210 truck drivers
- Marine: 3,214,526
- Rail: 226,590
- 29,038,273 travellers used Primary inspection kiosks
- 3,505,851 travellers used Advanced Declaration
- 17 additional primary inspection kiosks across Canada
- 2.1 million NEXUS members
Commercial goods imports in 2025 (to )
- 24.8 million releases of goods into the commerce of Canada
- 127 million courier shipments
- $223.1 billion Trusted Trader value for duty imported
- $41.4 billion total duties and taxes assessed (customs duties, Special Import Measures Act [SIMA] duties, surtaxes, GST and excise taxes)
- Commercial by the numbers:
- Highway: 4,267,922 trucks
- Air: 3,191,036 shipments
- Marine: 1,688,846 containers
- Rail: 518,317 cars
Food, plant and animal 2025 (to )
3,145 Agriculture and Agri-Food Administrative Monetary Penalties (AAAMP) issued for food, plant and animal import violations totaling $2,391,400 in penalties.
Enforcement in 2025 (to )
44,486 seizures, coming in to Canada (from US and other countries), including:
- 585 seizures for a total of 742 firearms seized
- 6,948 seizures for a total of 13,576 weapons seized
- 27,320 illegal drugs seizures
- Cocaine (including coca leaves, coca paste, cocaine and cocaine crack): 3,243 kilograms
- Heroin: 87 kilograms
- Fentanyl: 2.6 kilograms
- Other opioids (including opium, methadone, morphine and morphine base): 922 kilograms
- Methamphetamines: 693 kilograms
- Other drugs, narcotics and chemicals: 26,497 kilograms (this number excludes cocaine, heroin, fentanyl, other opioids and cannabis)
- 13,421 cannabis seizures totaling 42,439 kilograms
- 2,874 tobacco seizures totaling 783,424 kilograms
- 81 child pornography seizures
Firearm seizures in 2025 (to )
- Total firearms seized: 742
- Total firearms seizures: 585
| Firearm type | Quantity |
|---|---|
| Miscellaneous (for example, replica firearms, firearms parts, large capacity magazines, silencers, etc.) | 26,189 |
| Handgun | 445 |
| Semiauto pistol | 97 |
| Revolver | 65 |
| Rifle | 55 |
| Full auto carbine | 8 |
| Shotgun | 29 |
| Other (including full auto pistol, full auto rifle and semiauto carbine) | 14 |
| Semiautomatic rifle | 26 |
| Antique firearm | 3 |
Weapons seizures in 2025 (to )
- Total weapons seized: 13,576
- Total weapon seizures: 6,948
| Prohibited weapons type | Quantity |
|---|---|
| Brass Knuckle | 2,272 |
| Automatic opening knife | 4,122 |
| Centrifugal opening knife | 3,868 |
| Stun Gun | 1,452 |
| Kiyoga/steel cobra baton | 353 |
| Tear Gas/pepper spray | 512 |
| Innocuous device with knife | 156 |
| Bladed Ring | 35 |
| Taser | 412 |
| Push dagger | 184 |
| Gravity opening knife | 100 |
| Crossbow (one handed use) | 7 |
| Shuriken | 41 |
| Nunchaku | 17 |
| Other (including Constant Companion kife, Kusari/Manrikigusari) | 29 |
| Morning Star | 15 |
| Blowgun | 2 |
Breakdown of LO-Intervened off-boards
| Year | Suspected Fraud | Technical | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2,647 | 16,608 | 19,255 |
| 2022 | 6,587 | 2,162 | 8,749 |
| 2023 | 7,496 | 1,239 | 8,735 |
| 2024 | 9,920 | 1,132 | 11,052 |
| 2025 (up to ) | - | - | 5,889 |
| Total | - | - | 53,680 |
Alternatives to Detention (ATDs) Statistics
| Province | ATD Client Count |
|---|---|
| Newfoundland and Labrador | 17 |
| Nova Scotia | 64 |
| Prince Edward Island | 0 |
| New Brunswick | 33 |
| Québec | 1,799 |
| Ontario | 8,422 |
| Manitoba | 413 |
| Saskatchewan | 89 |
| Alberta | 1,194 |
| British Columbia | 2,164 |
| Nunavut | 0 |
| North West Territories | 0 |
| Yukon | 0 |
| Total | 14,166 |
Allowed to Leaves issued at POEs
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 (up to ) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Allowed to Leaves issued at POE | 37,304 | 44,948 | 32,267 |
- If an officer at a port of entry examines a foreign national and the person is believed to be inadmissible, the officer may in some circumstances allow the person to voluntarily withdraw their application to enter Canada and allow them to depart
- Each case will be assessed individually and a decision will be based on the specific facts of the case and whether the objectives of the IRPA would be best achieved without seeking a formal removal order
Inadmissibility (A44) Reports (serious inadmissibility grounds)
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 (up to ) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A44 reports – serious inadmissibility grounds | 3,589 | 4,357 | 3,736 |
- The above represents A44 reports for the following IRPA inadmissibility grounds: security, human rights violations, serious criminality, criminality, organized crime, sanctions and transborder criminality
- A finding of inadmissibility begins with the officer making an allegation by preparing an inadmissibility (A44) report which is supported by evidence
- A44 is then reviewed by another official (Minister's Delegate) who may issue a prescribed removal order if the inadmissibility allegation is within their jurisdiction or refer the A44 report to the Immigration and Refugee Board for an admissibility hearing
Stolen vehicles
| Region | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025Tablenote 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic (ATL) | 73 | 30 | 100 | 118 | 51 | 188 | 142 | 131 |
| Quebec (QUE) | 348 | 605 | 816 | 1,020 | 1,050 | 1,204 | 1,313 | 818 |
| Northern Ontario (NOR) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Southern Ontario (SOR) | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Greater Toronto Area (GTA) | 25 | 69 | 250 | 194 | 229 | 773 | 680 | 187 |
| Prairies | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Pacific | 11 | 55 | 75 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 136 | 185 |
| Total | 463 | 766 | 1,244 | 1,345 | 1,348 | 1,806 | 2,277 | 1,327 |
Anti-dumping (As of )
As of , the CBSA has conducted 31 anti-dumping and countervailing investigations across eight product groups, spanning the mineral oil, paper, plastic, and predominantly steel industries, involving 15 countries, primarily China. Of the 31 investigations, 24 are ongoing.
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025Tablenote 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # of products | 4 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| # of investigations handled | 16 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 28 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 31 |
Active Investigations:
- Thermoformed Molded Fibre Tableware
- Plates, bowls, and take-out containers made from recycled paper pulp. They're pressed into shape (molded) and often used as eco-friendly disposable tableware
- Oil Country Tubular Goods
- Steel pipes used in the oil and gas industry to drill wells and bring resources to the surface. This includes casing, tubing, and drill pipe that must withstand extreme underground pressure
- Cast Iron Soil Pipe
- Heavy, durable iron pipes used to carry waste and water in buildings and underground systems. They're common in older plumbing and commercial construction because they reduce noise and last a long time
- Thermal Paper Rolls
- Paper used in cash register receipts and credit card machines that darkens when heated by the printer head
- Steel Strapping
- Strong, flat steel bands used to bundle and secure heavy products—like lumber, steel coils, or bricks—during shipping or storage
- Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire
- Long, thin strands of steel made by drawing carbon or alloy steel through dies. Used for making nails, fencing, springs, cables, and many industrial products
- Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin
- A type of plastic resin used to make clear beverage bottles, food containers, and synthetic fibres like polyester clothing. It's lightweight and recyclable
- Renewable Diesel
- A fuel made from animal fats, vegetable oils, or other organic materials. It's chemically similar to regular diesel and can be used in diesel engines without blending, but it produces fewer greenhouse gas emissions
Global data pack
Drugs
Key Takeaways (Overall Quantities in grams)
- Despite covering only January to October, the 2025 seizure total (73,190,672g) already exceeds the total reported for all of 2024 (52,056,505g). This represents a 41% increase
- Compared with 2023 (79,352,888g), seizure numbers in 2024 (52,056,505g) were lower, reflecting a downward trend. This is a decrease of about 34%
- 2020 recorded the lowest amount of seizures (30,150,272g). This is likely due to low traveller volumes during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- In 2022, 55,618,092g of seizures were recorded. This then surged to 79,352,888g seized in 2023. This represents approximately a 43% increase
Key Takeaways (Overall - Count of Seizure Actions)
- 2023 recorded the highest amount of seizure actions (39,057)
- Seizure activity decreased in 2024 (28,339), compared to the 2023 count (39,057). This is a decrease of about 27%
- Although 2025 is not yet complete, the year's seizure count (27,314), is already close to the full year total of 2024 (28,339)
The most drug seizures were made in X Region, the least in X Region
- From to . GTAR recorded the highest amount of drug seizures (149,377,824g)
- From to , NOR recorded the least amount of seizures (728,744g)
Specific commodities where import seizures are up are/Specific commodities where import seizures are down:
| Commodity Seized | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cannabis | 3,617,026.28 | 4,676,476.16 | 2,523,144.54 | 10,400,202.15 | 4,750,460.97 | 2,677,566.92 |
| Cocaine | 1,175,871.06 | 1,159,075.53 | 3,094,102.76 | 1,752,739.21 | 4,542,856.67 | 2,856,843.57 |
| Methamphetamine | 616,046.26 | 374,698.22 | 584,328.01 | 2,189,346.68 | 1,200,771.25 | 693,256.61 |
| Other Opioids | 693,362.30 | 1,206,745.73 | 5,942,460.63 | 2,784,245.61 | 348,704.09 | 918,944.37 |
| Fentanyl | 2,421.00 | 2,815.63 | 1,410.95 | 616.38 | 661.33 | 120.04 |
| Heroin | 91,291.62 | 131,200.65 | 387,172.86 | 87,524.96 | 3,044.29 | 82,474.01 |
| All Other Drugs | 20,526,320.05 | 20,615,576.09 | 30,089,838.98 | 40,543,191.82 | 26,837,717.86 | 23,807,601.65 |
| All quantities are in grams only Note: 2025 data only goes up to |
||||||
Specific commodities where export seizures are up/ Specific commodities where export seizures are down:
| Commodity Seized | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cannabis | 3,101,582.16 | 7,610,512.65 | 11,147,571.68 | 13,200,661.79 | 13,032,517.11 | 39,761,178.64 |
| Cocaine | 12,190.16 | 155,995.17 | 40,689.29 | 34,946.04 | 46,100.86 | 385,990.70 |
| Methamphetamine | 170,745.97 | 511,377.42 | 1,156,453.48 | 7,939,500.06 | 971,741.15 | 1,009,356.28 |
| Other Opioids | 29.51 | 119.00 | 245,994.29 | 3,563.54 | 899.88 | 3,231.98 |
| Fentanyl | 4,475.10 | 87.28 | 2,471.27 | 43.24 | 4,269.60 | 2,479.15 |
| Heroin | 530.40 | 359.10 | 10,642.20 | 98.40 | 34,955.53 | 4,468.49 |
| All Other Drugs | 138,377.86 | 94,783.18 | 391,811.73 | 416,208.22 | 281,804.56 | 987,160.05 |
| All Quantities are in grams only Note: 2025 data only goes up to |
||||||
The five year trend for drug seizures is:
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Import | 26,722,338.48 | 28,166,592.61 | 42,624,458.75 | 57,757,835.11 | 37,684,209.42 | 31,036,967.72 |
| Export | 3,427,934.48 | 8,373,229.20 | 12,993,633.99 | 21,595,052.99 | 14,372,295.73 | 42,153,704.74 |
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Import | 32,633 | 27,269 | 21,533 | 42,063 | 25,808 | 23,597 |
| Export | 2,692 | 6,498 | 9,708 | 7,201 | 6,621 | 7,019 |
| Precursor Seized | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,4-butanediol (BDO) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 83,152.00 | 9,920,101.00 | 183,670.00 | 390,131.10 |
| 1-Phenyl-2-propanone | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31,570.00 | 36,678.00 | 4,568,300.00 | 27,158.00 |
| 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenyl-2-pro | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5,983,371.25 | 6,075,213.80 | 326,709.80 | 2,442.00 |
| Ephedrine | 3,159.30 | 8,173.78 | 177,040.71 | 54,821.67 | 31,997.25 | 179,908.46 |
| Ergotamine | 175.73 | 110.00 | 95.01 | 115.16 | 248.24 | 20.05 |
| Gamma butyrolactone (GBL) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1,351,494.00 | 263,579.00 | 53,236.00 | 1,056,430.00 |
| Lysergic Acid | 3.00 | 112.00 | 37.01 | 8.00 | 32.02 | 9.45 |
| N-Acetylanthranilic Acid | 1,284.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Norephedrine | 0.00 | 0.00 | 80.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Phenylacetic Acid | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12,800.00 |
| Piperidine | 603.70 | 0.10 | 351,354.00 | 67,060.30 | 1,000.00 | 28.00 |
| Potassium Permanganate | 0.00 | 3.00 | 1,220.00 | 928.00 | 0.00 | 2,336.20 |
| Pseudoephedrine | 57.30 | 184.70 | 74.00 | 1,409.00 | 856.30 | 2,004.30 |
| White phosphorus | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 3,100.00 |
| Grand Total | 5,283.03 | 8,583.58 | 7,979,487.98 | 16,419,913.93 | 5,166,059.61 | 1,676,367.56 |
| Note: 2025 data only goes up to | ||||||
The five year trend for precursor seizures is:
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Import | 5,283.03 | 8,583.58 | 7,979,487.98 | 16,419,913.93 | 5,166,059.61 | 1,676,367.56 |
| Export | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Firearms
Firearms and Weapon Seizures
| Commodity Type | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firearms | 495 | 1,071 | 1,100 | 920 | 883 | 742 |
| Weapons | 52,230 | 63,571 | 20,906 | 27,134 | 17,260 | 13,576 |
| Note: 2025 data only goes up to | ||||||
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firearms | 495 | 1,071 | 1,100 | 920 | 883 | 742 |
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weapon | 52,230 | 63,571 | 20,906 | 27,134 | 17,260 | 13,576 |
CBSA Criminal Investigation Prosecution Outcomes:
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firearms cases with findings of guilt | 18 | 36 | 38 | 29 | 37 |
Charge/Prosecution Acceptance Rate:
Since , over 95% of the charge recommendations made by the CSBA to the Crown following firearms and weapons investigations undertaken by the CBSA, have resulted in charges approved and prosecutions launched in court.
Results of CBSA search warrants away from the border (as part of criminal investigations):
| Prohibited Firearms | Firearms Restricted/Non Restricted | Prohibited Firearms Parts | Firearms Parts | Prohibited Weapons | Prohibited Devices | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| to Tablenote 1 | 82 | 193 | 95 | 174 | 2,800 | 149 |
|
Note: Not all firearms seized away from the border are associated to allegations of smuggling or other border offences. Some may be seized for other "plain view" offences, such as unsafe storage, when investigators are lawfully present pursuant to a CBSA search warrant. |
||||||
Stolen vehicles
Stolen vehicle trend
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351 | 346 | 463 | 766 | 1,244 | 1,345 | 1,348 | 1,806 | 2,277 | 1,389 |
Undeclared currency
Currency and Suspected Proceeds of Crime Seizures
Total value of currency and suspected of proceeds of crime seizures from to
| Commodity Seized | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | 11,526,423 | 13,291,159 | 14,608,802 | 25,098,868 | 33,615,096 | 34,275,171 |
| Suspected Proceeds of Crime | 3,273,025 | 2,557,668 | 1,427,023 | 3,622,294 | 5,474,724 | 3,512,581 |
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | 11,526,423 | 13,291,159 | 14,608,802 | 25,098,868 | 33,615,096 | 34,275,171 |
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspected Proceeds of Crime | 3,273,025 | 2,557,668 | 1,427,023 | 3,622,294 | 5,474,724 | 3,512,581 |
Asylum Statistics
Number of recommended offboards by CBSA ILOs
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2832Footnote 1 | 10756 | 12018 | 13154 | 16592 | 19255 | 8749 | 8735 | 11052 | 5889Footnote 2 |
The number of asylum claims in the last 10 years are:
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBSA | 11,342 | 22,208 | 29,545 | 29,486 | 7,950 | 13,052 | 64,551 | 72,841 | 59,441 | 31,378 | 341,794 |
| IRCC | 12,537 | 28,666 | 25,615 | 34,668 | 15,790 | 12,060 | 27,655 | 71,347 | 113,559 | 72,374 | 414,271 |
| Total | 23,879 | 50,874 | 55,160 | 64,154 | 23,740 | 25,112 | 92,206 | 144,188 | 173,000 | 103,752 | 756,065 |
|
As of |
|||||||||||
Percentage increase 2016–2025: As of , the percentage difference for both agencies combined between 2016 and 2025 is an increase of 334%…that number will increase as we reach the end of the year. (CBSA: 177% increase; IRCC: 477% increase)
Percentage increase 2022–2025: As of , the percentage difference for both agencies combined between 2022 and 2025 is an increase of 13% …that number will increase as we reach the end of the year. (CBSA: 51% decrease; IRCC: 162% increase)
The number of asylum claims at Lacolle are:
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| 20,415 | 8,158 | 14,155 |
Number of IRB asylum hearings with CBSA representation
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,995 | 2,938 | 3,137 | 3,973 | 5,099 | 3,819 | 4,286 | 5,057 | 6,347 | 6,812 |
CBSA's annual removals:
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7,636 | 8,746 | 8,385 | 11,271 | 12,851 | 7,514 | 8,328 | 15,216 | 17,381 | 19,612 |
CBSA's removal inventory (defined as removals in progress and wanted) is:
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | n/a | n/a | 53,312 | 51,712 | 50,439 | 48,403 | 48,307 | 50,519 | 60,860 |
Projected removal inventory (including wanted and in progress) assuming at least 25,000 removals per year
| 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67,610 | 68,458 | 69,756 | 71,054 | 72,352 |
Assumptions:
- IRB maintains calendar year 2024 decision volume (approximately 73,000 decisions) and acceptance rate (63%). Although the new Asylum target for RPD is 80,000 to 85,000
- The CBSA enforces 25,000 removals per year (Note that the CBSA is currently funded for 20,000 in fiscal year 2026–2027, and 16,000 for future years)
- Impact of other other inadmissibility cases (e.g., overstays) is not included
- The CBSA will enforce 20,000 removals in 2025
- Bill C-12 impact on inventory is not included
Current top 5 recalcitrant countries:
| Country | Number of pending removals |
|---|---|
| India | 6,667 |
| China | 1,434 |
| Nigeria | 976 |
| Pakistan | 868 |
| Bangladesh | 533 |
CBSA's security screening inventory vs completed screens per year:
Intake:
| Year | IRCC Asylum claims received | Number of Asylum claims referred for security screening | IRCC visa applications (TR/PR) received | Number of visa applications (TR/PR) referred for security screening | Total number of files received by IRCC | Total number of files referred to for security screening | Number of recommendations completed by CINSS (Files Closed) | Remaining Security Screening Inventory at the end of the calendar year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 143,310 | 132,204 (92.3%) | 6,898,855 | 73,780 (1.1%) | 7,042,165 | 205,984 (2.9%) | 129,896 | 102,268 |
| 2024 | 171,835 | 152,934 (89.0%) | 6,614,190 | 71,200 (1.1%) | 6,786,025 | 224,134 (3.3%) | 161,737 | 155,017 |
| 2025 | 80,213 | 67,730 (84.4%) | 3,562,885 | 32,353 (0.9%) | 3,643,098 | 100,083 (2.7%) | 54,150 | 194,762 |
|
2025 up to |
||||||||
Results:
| Year | Visa Applications (TR/PR) | Asylum Claims | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-favourable | Favourable + | Inconclusive + | Non-favourable | Favourable + | Inconclusive + | Non-favourable | Favourable + | Inconclusive + | |
| 2023 | 802 (2.1%) | 33,860 (89.0%) | 2,071 (5.4%) | 127 (0.1%) | 81,988 (89.3%) | 4,262 (4.6%) | 929 (0.7%) | 115,848 (89.2%) | 6,333 (4.9%) |
| 2024 | 920 (2.2%) | 36,103 (86.8%) | 1,174 (2.8%) | 152 (0.1%) | 115,678 (96.3%) | 952 (0.8%) | 1,072 (0.7%) | 151,781 (93.8%) | 2,126 (1.3%) |
| 2025 | 394 (2.1%) | 15,887 (85.8%) | 674 (3.6%) | 106 (0.3%) | 33,966 (95.3%) | 227 (0.6%) | 500 (0.9%) | 49,853 (92.1%) | 901 (1.7%) |
|
2025 up to |
|||||||||
CBSA's Detention Capacity is:
| BC IHC | Toronto IHC | Laval IHC | Ste. Anne Des Pleines | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75 (max is 100) | 157 (max is 207) | 112 (max is 137) | 25 (max is 25) | 369 (max is 469) |
|
Note: The maximum capacity includes the number of regular beds and the number of temporary cots. |
||||
CBSA's detention rates:
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,969 | 8,540 | 8,489 | 9,193 | 3,104 | 2,475 | 4,902 | 5,191 | 4,276 | 3,245 |
|
Note: The 2025 data captures all cases between to . |
|||||||||
CBSA's detention rate as a percentage of asylum claims
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45% | 32% | 30% | 33% | 40% | 40% | 38% | 47% | 53% | 53% |
|
Notes:
|
|||||||||
Trade Statistics
Anti dumping and subsidy investigations – opened and concluded
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # of products | 4 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| # of investigations handled | 16 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 28 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 33 |
|
As of |
||||||||||
Sanctions Implementation – number of sanctions in place being enforced by CBSA
There are currently 12 countries against which there are import sanctions and 22 countries against which there are export sanctions. In recent years, the Government of Canada has increased its use of sanctions, currently imposing sanctions on 355 Harmonized System (HS) codes, as well as all goods being imported from North Korea and Syria. The CBSA's responsibility for exports is broader and requires ensuring compliance for all exports to North Korea, a wide range of industrial goods to Iran, and all exports to specific entities (people and businesses) in 19 other countries (e.g., Myanmar, Sudan, Iraq). The current sanctions against Russia are the most extensive with 935 different HS codes covering industrial and luxury goods.
Duties and Taxes Compliance Statistics
Duties and taxes collected
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30,328,382,095.11 | 31,936,176,632.49 | 34,854,643,704.04 | 33,425,365,815.31 | 28,182,435,842.93 |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33,290,518,168.28 | 39,352,361,078.33 | 39,757,683,389.86 | 39,553,010,699.70 | 39,205,777,419.38 |
|
Up to |
||||
Number of Compliance Verification Audits Concluded(?) and Amounts Assessed
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | n/a | 1,203 | 1,386 | 651 | 989 | 833 | 814 | 815 | 598 |
| n/a | n/a | $395.2 million | $153.8 million | $36.5 million | $442.0 million | $286.4 million | $98.9 million | $73.2 million | $129.9 million |
|
Up to |
|||||||||
Additional Information:
Number of Compliance Interventions and Amount Assessed:
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 98 | 276 | 409 |
| NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | $61.3 million | $9.99 million | $71.8 million |
|
Up to |
|||||||||
Strategic Export Enforcement - Sanctions and Counter-Proliferation Referrals for Enforcement by Counter-Proliferation Operations Section (CPOS), CBSA
| 2016–2017 | 2020–2021 | 2021–2022 | 2022–2023 | 2023–2024 | 2024–2025 | 2025–2026 YTD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Export Declarations reviewed by CPOS | 1,069,891 | 1,239,346 | 1,259,576 | 1,608,857 | 1,573,312 | 1,227,237 | 781,001 |
| Sanctions-related Export Referrals to Regions | 10 | 4 | 12 | 59 | 76 | 145 | 106 |
| Non-Sanctions Export Referrals to Regions | 361 | 628 | 657 | 702 | 841 | 665 | 588 |
IEB data pack
Removals Inventory – 5 Year
| 2020 November |
2021 November |
Change | 2022 November |
Change | 2023 November |
Change | 2024 November |
Change | 2025 November |
Change | Overall Change (2021–2025) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Yet Actionable | 148,413 | 130,455 | -12% | 146,515 | 12% | 242,584 | 66% | 393,702 | 62% | 469,104 | 19% | 216% |
| Removal Not Possible | 16,244 | 15,693 | -3% | 19,874 | 27% | 20,660 | 4% | 20,918 | 1% | 25,540 | 22% | 57% |
| Wanted | 33,002 | 29,701 | -10% | 29,464 | -1% | 29,414 | 0% | 30,001 | 2% | 33,240 | 11% | 1% |
| Removal in Progress | 18,303 | 18,787 | 3% | 19,065 | 1% | 20,418 | 7% | 28,869 | 41% | 29,463 | 2% | 61% |
| Total | 215,962 | 194,636 | -10% | 214,918 | 10% | 313,076 | 46% | 473,490 | 51% | 557,347 | 18% | 158% |
- The Removal in Progress inventory had grown by 61% over the last five years; due to efforts to increase removal volumes under the Border Plan, the inventory increased by only 2% from to 2025
- Over five years, the Wanted inventory has fluctuated year to year, but grown by less than 1% overall
- Over the past five years, the wanted for removal inventory grew by 238 cases, while during the same period, the CBSA removed over 81,000 inadmissible foreign nationals from Canada
- Of the total 25,540 individuals in the Removal Not Possible inventory, 12,894 are subject to ADR/TSR stay (see table 11)
- CBSA removal efforts may be hindered and delayed by impediments such as uncooperative foreign nationals who do not provide necessary information or documentation to allow for their removal, or foreign governments that refuse the return of their nationals, or fail to promptly issue timely travel documents. The CBSA works closely with foreign governments, Canadian officials abroad, and other departments to resolve these challenges, and participates in international forums to identify joint strategies and best practices to achieve timely removals of inadmissible persons
Definitions
- Not Yet Actionable inventory includes individuals that fall outside of the enforcement stream including those pending refugee determination, a percentage of which will eventually enter Removals In Progress inventory, and convention refugees
- Removal Not Possible inventory includes individuals that cannot currently be removed, including those pending Federal Court appeals, criminal charges, or Pre-Removal Risk Assessments, or serving a sentence of imprisonment
- Wanted inventory includes individuals who failed to appear for removal proceedings and the CBSA is working to locate
- Removal In Progress inventory includes individuals who can be processed for removal; at this stage, CBSA works with the individual and foreign countries to overcome challenges to removal, including the issuance of travel documents
Removals Inventory – 12 Month
| Overall Change (Dec-Nov) |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not yet Actionable | 395,837 | 404,377 | 415,187 | 421,285 | 426,782 | 433,181 | 439,617 | 444,264 | 450,679 | 457,814 | 463,271 | 469,104 | 18.5% |
| Removal not Possible | 20,852 | 20,693 | 20,365 | 20,303 | 20,724 | 21,515 | 22,068 | 22,290 | 22,383 | 23,126 | 24,238 | 25,540 | 22.5% |
| Wanted | 30,005 | 29,927 | 30,660 | 31,466 | 31,334 | 31,743 | 32,122 | 32,256 | 32,503 | 32,797 | 32,734 | 33,240 | 10.8% |
| Removal in Progress | 29,189 | 30,688 | 30,244 | 30,683 | 31,358 | 31,337 | 30,279 | 30,725 | 30,876 | 30,472 | 30,319 | 29,463 | 0.9% |
| Total | 475,883 | 485,685 | 496,456 | 503,737 | 510,198 | 517,776 | 524,086 | 529,535 | 536,441 | 544,209 | 550,562 | 557,347 | 17.1% |
- The Removal in Progress inventory has remained relatively stable, fluctuating by up to 5% per month and increasing less than 1% over the year due to increased efforts on removals since
- The CBSA prioritizes removals based on a risk management regime that assigns the highest priority to cases involving security, organized crime, crimes against humanity, and criminality. These are followed by failed refugee claimants as second tier, and all other inadmissible persons as the lowest priority
Removals Inventory with Criminality – 12 Month
| Overall Change (Dec-Nov) |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not yet Actionable | Total | 395,837 | 404,377 | 415,187 | 421,285 | 426,782 | 433,181 | 439,617 | 444,264 | 450,679 | 457,814 | 463,271 | 469,104 | 18.5% |
| With Criminality | 920 | 915 | 919 | 909 | 915 | 943 | 955 | 955 | 988 | 1,009 | 1,035 | 1,051 | 14.2% | |
| % Criminality | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | - | |
| Removal not Possible | Total | 20,852 | 20,693 | 20,365 | 20,303 | 20,724 | 21,515 | 22,068 | 22,290 | 22,383 | 23,126 | 24,238 | 25,540 | 22.5% |
| With Criminality | 2,680 | 2,681 | 2,664 | 2,662 | 2,653 | 2,669 | 2,676 | 2,716 | 2,732 | 2,732 | 2,722 | 2,751 | 2.6% | |
| % Criminality | 12.9% | 13.0% | 13.1% | 13.1% | 12.8% | 12.4% | 12.1% | 12.2% | 12.2% | 11.8% | 11.2% | 10.8% | - | |
| Wanted | Total | 30,005 | 29,927 | 30,660 | 31,466 | 31,334 | 31,743 | 32,122 | 32,256 | 32,503 | 32,797 | 32,734 | 33,240 | 10.8% |
| With Criminality | 666 | 667 | 671 | 670 | 671 | 674 | 686 | 697 | 715 | 724 | 722 | 729 | 9.5% | |
| % Criminality | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.2% | - | |
| Removal in Progress | Total | 29,189 | 30,688 | 30,244 | 30,683 | 31,358 | 31,337 | 30,279 | 30,725 | 30,876 | 30,472 | 30,319 | 29,463 | 0.9% |
| With Criminality | 1,098 | 1,132 | 1,166 | 1,201 | 1,239 | 1,255 | 1,234 | 1,216 | 1,201 | 1,250 | 1,273 | 1,279 | 16.5% | |
| % Criminality | 3.8% | 3.7% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.1% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 4.1% | 4.2% | 4.3% | - | |
| Total | Total | 475,883 | 485,685 | 496,456 | 503,737 | 510,198 | 517,776 | 524,086 | 529,535 | 536,441 | 544,209 | 550,562 | 557,347 | 17.1% |
| With Criminality | 5,364 | 5,395 | 5,420 | 5,442 | 5,478 | 5,541 | 5,551 | 5,584 | 5,636 | 5,715 | 5,752 | 5,810 | 8.3% | |
| % Criminality | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 1.0% | - |
- About 2% of the Wanted inventory cases involved criminality or serious criminality consistently over 12 months
- For the Removal in Progress, the percentage of cases involving criminality has slowly risen over the past year, reaching 4.3% in November
- Foreign nationals who are still serving a criminal sentence or have pending criminal charges cannot be removed until the criminal matters are resolved. These cases are subject to a legislated stay of removal and are found in the Removal Not Possible inventory, which is why the proportion of cases with criminality is significantly higher than other categories. CBSA may issue a warrant for arrest to ensure that CBSA is notified following the completion of their criminal custody
Removals Caseload with Criminality – 5 Year
| Tablenote 1 | # Criminality Overall Change (2023–2025) |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | Total | # Criminality | % Criminality | Total | # Criminality | % Criminality | Total | # Criminality | % Criminality | Total | # Criminality | % Criminality | ||
| Not yet Actionable | 144,579 | 127,166 | 155,514 | 738 | 0.5% | 265,571 | 827 | 0.3% | 404,377 | 915 | 0.2% | 469,104 | 1,051 | 0.2% | 42.4% |
| Removal not Possible | 15,917 | 16,022 | 20,038 | 2,381 | 11.9% | 20,454 | 2,501 | 12.2% | 20,693 | 2,681 | 13.0% | 25,540 | 2,751 | 10.8% | 15.5% |
| Wanted | 31,756 | 29,170 | 29,295 | 643 | 2.2% | 29,237 | 644 | 2.2% | 29,927 | 667 | 2.2% | 33,240 | 729 | 2.2% | 13.4% |
| Removal in Progress | 18,683 | 19,233 | 19,012 | 992 | 5.2% | 21,282 | 976 | 4.6% | 30,688 | 1,132 | 3.7% | 29,463 | 1,279 | 4.3% | 28.9% |
| Total | 210,935 | 191,591 | 223,859 | 4,754 | 2.1% | 336,544 | 4,948 | 1.5% | 485,685 | 5,395 | 1.1% | 557,347 | 5,810 | 1.0% | 22.2% |
- Since 2023, the number of cases involving criminality has increased 13% for Wanted inventory, although the rate has remained at 2.2%
- The number of criminality cases increased by 29% for Removal in Progress inventory, but the rate has dropped from 5.2% to 4.3%
- Criminality categories include:
- 36 (1) Serious criminality for
- having been convicted in Canada of an offence under an Act of Parliament punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 10 years, or of an offence under an Act of Parliament for which a term of imprisonment of more than six months has been imposed
- having been convicted of an offence outside Canada that, if committed in Canada, would constitute an offence under an Act of Parliament punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 10 years
- 36 (2) Criminality for
- having been convicted in Canada of an offence under an Act of Parliament punishable by way of indictment, or of two offences under any Act of Parliament not arising out of a single occurrence
- having been convicted outside Canada of an offence that, if committed in Canada, would constitute an indictable offence under an Act of Parliament, or of two offences not arising out of a single occurrence that, if committed in Canada, would constitute offences under an Act of Parliament
- 36 (1) Serious criminality for
Warrant Inventory
| # of Active Warrants | In Criminal Detention | % of Inventory | Not in Criminal Detention | % of Inventory | Active Warrants with Criminality | % of Inventory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40,407 | 526Tablenote 1 | 1.30% | 39,881 | 98.70% | 1,578 | 3.9% |
- The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act allows for issuance of a warrant for arrest and detention of an inadmissible individual who either poses a danger to the public or is unlikely to appear for an immigration proceeding, including removal
- Immigration warrants are sent to the Canadian Police Information Centre so that local police may notify CBSA if they encounter an individual subject to an immigration warrant
- Individuals subject to immigration warrants include cases of people that are presently in criminal detention. As such, their whereabouts are known. Warrants are issued to ensure that CBSA is notified upon completion of their criminal detention
- The CBSA has 40,407 active warrants, including 1,578 with criminality, and of the these, 500 are in criminal detention
- Over the past two fiscal years (fiscal year 2023–2024 and fiscal year 2024–2025), there were 7,041 warrants issued and during the same period 9,578 warrants were concluded (e.g., individuals located and arrested or confirmed to be out of Canada). In fiscal year 2025–2026, 4,706 warrants were issued and 3,231 warrants concluded. Over the past several years, CBSA has located and arrested on average 2,800 wanted individuals per year
Removals Enforced
| Total | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Removals Completed | 1,447 | 1,655 | 1,877 | 2,124 | 1,975 | 1,710 | 1,720 | 2,502 | 2,377 | 1,636 | 1,544 | 1,133 | 21,700 |
| With Criminality | 56 | 84 | 66 | 72 | 79 | 68 | 85 | 75 | 66 | 68 | 72 | 54 | 845 |
| Criminality % | 3.9% | 5.1% | 3.5% | 3.4% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.9% | 3.0% | 2.8% | 4.2% | 4.7% | 4.8% | 3.9% |
- In the past year, CBSA removed nearly 22,000 inadmissible foreign nationals, of which 845 (or 3.9%) involved criminality
- The Border Plan provided $55.5 million to support immigration and asylum processing and to increase CBSA's capacity to reach 20,000 removals for fiscal years 2025–2026 and 2026–2027
- As of , the CBSA has enforced 14,597 removals in this fiscal year, on pace to exceed the target for fiscal year 2025–2026
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 (By November) |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Removals Completed | 12,851 | 7,514 | 8,328 | 15,218 | 17,381 | 20,253 | 81,545 |
| With Criminality | 537 | 480 | 541 | 640 | 742 | 789 | 3729 |
| % Criminality | 4.2% | 6.4% | 6.5% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 3.9% | 4.6% |
- In the first 11 months in 2025, the CBSA has completed over 20,000 removals, which is already higher than any of the past five years
- Of these, approximately 4% involved criminality
Escorted Removals
| Total | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Removals Completed | 96 | 112 | 108 | 115 | 189 | 104 | 154 | 249 | 185 | 122 | 88 | 65 | 1,587 |
- CBSA officers assess the risk of each case being removed and, for higher risk cases, recommend that escort officers accompany the foreign national to their destination to ensure the safety and security of the public, aircraft, and the foreign national themselves. Escort officers may also be deemed necessary by the airline, or to accompany a medical professional for foreign nationals with complex medical needs
- In the past year, CBSA conducted neary 1,600 escorted removals, representing 7.3% of the total removals
| Country | % of Total Escorted | Country | % of Total Escorted |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States of America | 57% | Philippines | 2% |
| India | 7% | Jamaica | 2% |
| Mexico | 3% | England | 1% |
| Romania | 3% | Colombia | 1% |
| Nigeria | 3% | France | 1% |
- The U.S. accounted for nearly 60% of the total escorts; the majority of these (92%) occurred at land POEs
- The top ten destination countries account for 80% of total escorted removals
Travel Document and Recalcitrant Countries
| Countries | Pending Travel Documents Requests | Countries | Pending Travel Documents Requests |
|---|---|---|---|
| India | 367 | Pakistan | 70 |
| China | 225 | Algeria | 33 |
| Bangladesh | 131 | Rwanda | 30 |
| Nigeria | 100 | Ethiopia | 23 |
| Ghana | 71 | Kenya | 18 |
- As of , the CBSA has received 895 Travel Documents (TD) for Removals this fiscal year, with over 1,500 pending applications
- As part of its Border Plan, the CBSA has implemented escalation measures and adopted a whole-of-government approach to engage countries that are recalcitrant to removals
- India: Following successful senior-level discussions between Canada and India, TD issuance has significantly improved since , with India issuing 77 documents in less than a month
- China: As result of HQ and regional engagements, TD issuance has somewhat improves, and communication between the consulates/Embassy and the CBSA has increased
- Bangladesh: Executive level meetings this year, including with the High Commissioner, and between a GAC ADM and the Bangladesh Foreign Secretary, have failed to produce any improvements. Unresponsive to working level communications from the CBSA, and very poor document issuance metrics
- Nigeria: The High Commission is a good working-level partner, and documents are issued on a regular basis; however, the process for includes in-person interviews with Ottawa-based consular officials resulting in significant delays and administrative burden for the CBSA to coordinate these interviews on behalf of individuals located nationwide. The current process is not sustainable given future Nigerian case volumes expected to enter the removal inventory in the coming years
- Ghana: Despite working-level meeting with acting High Commissioner at beginning of year, no noticeable improvements in TD issuance; a follow-up request for action was sent in November
- Pakistan: Despite ongoing challenges, the CBSA experienced some success in securing travel documents from Pakistan. There have been two executive level meetings with the High Commissioner in the past year; and removals are a topic of discussion at a meeting with the Minister of the Interior in Islamabad, being attended by the IRCC DM, the CDN HOM, and the CBSA Regional Director
- Algeria: CBSA/GAC increased senior level engagement and have delivered six diplomatic notes to the Algerian Ambassador. GAC has had two meetings with the Ambassador, and the Canadian HOM in Algiers has met with her Algerian counterparts. These efforts have resulted in the issuance of six travel documents including 4 priority cases
- Rwanda: Executive level engagement was conducted in , requesting that Rwanda expedite the issuance of the travel documents
- Ethiopia: Ethiopia rarely issues travel documents to the CBSA, and refuses to issue documents to individuals not returning to Ethiopia voluntarily. There have been multiple executive level meetings between the CBSA/GAC and Ethiopian officials in both Ottawa and in Addis Ababa this year, and the Ambassador and Head of Ethiopia's Immigration and Citizenship Service committed to working closer on travel document issuance; however, these commitments have not yet resulted in any improvements
- Kenya: Kenya is a strategically important partner for removals to Somalia; all of which much transfer through Nairobi. However, Kenya rarely issues travel documents to the CBSA for the removal of Kenyan nationals. Three ADM/DG level meetings were held with the High Commissioner at the beginning of the year, and there have been three subsequent working level meetings between CBSA and Kenyan officials in Ottawa and Nairobi, however this has not resulted in any improvements
ADR/TSR Countries and Volume
| Country | Inventory Cases | Country | Inventory Cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haiti | 6,496 | Iran | 233 |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2,528 | Republic of Mali | 202 |
| Venezuela | 1,032 | Syria | 147 |
| Democratic Republic of Somalia | 873 | Libya | 90 |
| Afghanistan | 578 | Remaining | 348 |
| Iraq | 367 | Total | 12,894 |
- The CBSA can impose an Administrative Deferral of Removal (ADR), or the Minister of Public Safety may impose a Temporary Suspension of Removal (TSR), when country conditions exist that could seriously endanger the lives or safety of the entire civilian population. It is not meant to address persistent and systemic human rights problems which constitute individual risk
- There is currently an active ADR in place for certain regions in Somalia (Middle Shabelle, Afgoye, and Mogadishu), the Gaza Strip, Ukraine, Syria, Mali, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Libya, Yemen, Venezuela, Haiti, Iran and Sudan. There is also an active TSR for in place for Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Iraq
- Individuals who benefit from an ADR or a TSR are located in the Removal Not Possible inventory. Individuals who have failed to comply with a reporting condition may be captured in the wanted inventory until they are located. Individuals inadmissible for safety or security concerns do not benefit from the ADR or TSR and will be located in the removal in progress inventory or wanted inventory depending on the specific details of their case
- There are approximately 13,000 ADR/TST cases in the inventory, 97% of which are for the top ten countries
Immigration Holding Centre Capacity and Detainee Volume
| Low/Medium Risk Beds |
High Risk BedsTablenote 1 | Total Available Beds (All risk) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Toronto, Ontario | 128 | 29 | 157 |
| Laval, Quebec | 85 | 27 | 112 |
| Surrey, British Columbia | 73 | 2 | 75 |
| Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines, Québec | - | 25 | 25 |
| Total | 286 | 83 | 369 |
- Budget 2024 provided the CBSA with funding to enhance its immigration holding centres in Toronto, Ontario and Laval, Quebec to various risk levels, including high risk detainees who had been previously housed in provincial correctional facilities, as well as establish a designated immigrant station at the Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines, Quebec
- The CBSA manages all immigration detainees within its immigration holding centres to the extent possible
- If an individual requires a higher degree of supervision and control than can be provided in an immigration holding centre, the CBSA may transfer that individual to the designated immigrant station in Saint-Anne-des-Plaines, Quebec in accordance with section 142 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
- This approach reinforces the CBSA's commitment to public safety by ensuring that high-risk detainees are managed in facilities that provide the necessary level of supervision and control
- As of , the detainee volumes were (Total: 167):
- Greater Toronto Area Immigration Holding Centre: 52
- Laval Immigration Holding Centre: 43
- British Columbia Immigration Holding Centre: 68
- Designated Immigrant Station (Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines): 4
SECU undertakings
Undertaking SECU: Fentanyl provincial breakdown
Question (excerpt from the meeting transcript)
: Canada – United States Border Management
Chak Au (Richmond Centre – Marpole, CPC): Yes, thank you. My first question is, what is the volume of fentanyl seizures in B.C. and in what form, like the border, ports, and other means. What's the volume?
Aaron McCrorie: From a border perspective this year, and I apologize, I can't give you the breakdown by province, but we've seized this year 2.59 kilograms of fentanyl. Of that, 1.73 kilograms was seized during Operation Blizzard in February.
Chak Au: That's through what means?
Aaron McCrorie: It's through a variety of means.
Primarily, we're seeing a lot of fentanyl now moving in the postal and the courier modes, so we're seeing it in our postal centres. Often in Operation Blizzard the majority of it was probably outbound. We saw we had a pattern of what we called micro traffickers sending small amounts of fentanyl south. We see it coming inbound. We also see fentanyl coming in with individual travellers. That's what our experience has been.
The challenge with fentanyl, as you probably know, is a very small amount can be very potent in so many ways. It's very easy to conceal and makes things like postal and courier the preferred mode for shipping it.
Chak Au: You mentioned there's no breakdown province by province. Can you provide that information?
Aaron McCrorie: We'll do our best to provide that.
Chak Au: Thank you very much.
Response:
Please see the attached annex for a comprehensive breakdown of fentanyl seizures by province from to .
Please note the following when reading the annex: "import" represents seizures upon importation from the United States and/or the rest of the world; "export" represents seizures upon exportation to the United States and/or the rest of world.
| 2024 | 2025 | Grand total | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | ||
| Alberta | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.20 | 0.00 | 11.20 |
| Commercial Aircraft | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.20 | 0.00 | 6.20 |
| Postal | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.00 |
| British Columbia | 296.00 | 4.64 | 0.00 | 7.50 | 1.20 | 73.10 | 13.50 | 25.00 | 4,160.53 | 35.20 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 146.90 | 1,516.50 | 378.35 | 141.10 | 17.80 | 6.80 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 6,827.42 |
| Commercial Aircraft | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.50 |
| Land | 296.00 | 4.64 | 0.00 | 7.50 | 1.20 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 30.53 | 35.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15.90 | 11.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 406.07 |
| Marine | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Postal | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 72.60 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 4,130.00 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 131.00 | 1,504.90 | 378.35 | 141.10 | 17.80 | 4.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6,407.85 |
| New Brunswick | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Land | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Ontario | 2.00 | 41.20 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 119.70 | 0.00 | 5.95 | 18.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 26.99 | 231.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 450.30 |
| Commercial Aircraft | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15.80 |
| Land | 2.00 | 41.20 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 7.20 | 0.00 | 5.95 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 26.99 | 59.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 150.00 |
| Postal | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 112.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 112.50 |
| Private Aircraft | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 172.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 172.00 |
| Quebec | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 7.40 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 107.00 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 122.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 238.70 |
| Land | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 107.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 107.40 |
| Postal | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 7.40 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 122.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 131.30 |
| Grand Total | 298.00 | 46.84 | 0.90 | 14.90 | 121.00 | 73.10 | 24.45 | 43.00 | 4,160.53 | 143.20 | 5.00 | 0.01 | 147.50 | 1,640.50 | 378.45 | 141.35 | 45.09 | 238.60 | 5.20 | 1.00 | 7,528.62 |
| 2024 | 2025 | Grand total | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Sep | ||
| Alberta | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.00 |
| Postal | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.00 |
| British Columbia | 296.00 | 4.64 | 0.00 | 3.50 | 1.20 | 0.50 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 30.53 | 35.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15.90 | 11.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 404.07 |
| Land | 296.00 | 4.64 | 0.00 | 3.50 | 1.20 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 30.53 | 35.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15.90 | 11.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 402.07 |
| Marine | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| New Brunswick | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Land | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Ontario | 2.00 | 41.20 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 119.70 | 0.00 | 5.95 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 26.99 | 59.80 | 0.00 | 260.50 |
| Land | 2.00 | 41.20 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 7.20 | 0.00 | 5.95 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 26.99 | 59.80 | 0.00 | 148.00 |
| Postal | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 112.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 112.50 |
| Quebec | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 107.00 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 109.30 |
| Land | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 107.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 107.40 |
| Postal | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.90 |
| Grand Total | 298.00 | 46.84 | 0.90 | 3.50 | 121.00 | 0.50 | 12.95 | 2.20 | 30.53 | 142.20 | 2.70 | 0.01 | 16.50 | 11.60 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 27.29 | 61.80 | 1.00 | 779.87 |
| 2024 | 2025 | Grand total | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | ||
| Alberta | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.20 | 6.20 |
| Commercial Aircraft | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.20 | 6.20 |
| British Columbia | 4.00 | 72.60 | 11.50 | 25.00 | 4,130.00 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 131.00 | 1,504.90 | 378.35 | 141.10 | 17.80 | 4.80 | 0.00 | 6,423.35 |
| Commercial Aircraft | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.50 |
| Land | 4.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| Postal | 0.00 | 72.60 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 4,130.00 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 131.00 | 1,504.90 | 378.35 | 141.10 | 17.80 | 4.80 | 0.00 | 6,407.85 |
| Ontario | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 172.00 | 0.00 | 189.80 |
| Commercial Aircraft | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15.80 |
| Land | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| Private Aircraft | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 172.00 | 0.00 | 172.00 |
| Quebec | 7.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 122.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 129.40 |
| Postal | 7.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 122.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 129.40 |
| Grand Total | 11.40 | 72.60 | 11.50 | 40.80 | 4,130.00 | 1.00 | 2.30 | 131.00 | 1,628.90 | 378.35 | 141.10 | 17.80 | 176.80 | 5.20 | 6,748.75 |
Undertaking SECU: Totoaba fish trade/Precursor chemicals
Question (excerpt from the meeting transcript)
: Canada – United States Border Management
Dane Lloyd: Thank you.
CBSA, are you seeing a rise in the trade of this totoaba fish in Canada? Are you guys tracking the moving of these fish products through Canada?
It's not an endangered species, but it's a species of concern.
Erin O'Gorman: Any seizures we make, we track, and we share the information with law enforcement. That specific fish—I can certainly come back in writing as to what we've found. I'll say yes to tracking anything that we find that shouldn't be coming into Canada
Dane Lloyd: Is it easier to facilitate a drug trade when people are exchanging goods, rather than money? Is it harder when there's money being exchanged? Is that why people would be trading animal products for precursor chemicals?
Erin O'Gorman: Trade-based money laundering is extremely difficult and it is on the rise.
I'm working with all of my counterparts in other countries. You might get a package of apples, and if the paperwork looks fishy, we might find—
Dane Lloyd: Fishy—that's an interesting pun. Thank you.
Response:
Totoaba (Totoaba macdonaldi) is listed as an Appendix I species under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora – International trade is not permitted without a Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora import and export permit issued by the respective authorities. Environment and Climate Change Canada implements and enforces these requirements under the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act. The Canada Border Services Agency assists Environment and Climate Change Canada by verifying and performing an initial import/export inspection to ensure permit requirements are met and validating the import/export permits. Suspected non-compliant shipments are detained and referred to Environment and Climate Change Canada for compliance verification and further enforcement. The Canada Border Services Agency may also administer penalties or pursue charges for contraventions for the Customs Act.
There are no Canada Border Services Agency reports of seizures of totoaba in Canada and no records of Environment and Climate Change Canada issuing an import permit or re-export certificate for totoaba.
Undertaking SECU: CBSA advice – Mexican visa decision
Question (excerpt from the meeting transcript)
: Canada – United States Border Management
Dane Lloyd: Okay.
Now, could you explain the rationale for reinstating the visa requirements for Mexico?
Erin O'Gorman: It wasn't a CBSA decision. It was a political decision and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship have the visa policy.
Dane Lloyd: Did your department provide any advice on this decision?
Erin O'Gorman: We would have provided advice and data, yes.
Dane Lloyd: Do you stand by the 2016 November report from CBSA that said that lifting these visa requirements would strengthen the presence of cartels in Canada?
Erin O'Gorman: I'd have to read it. It's hard to stand by a document that long ago.
What I would say is that it's about the data. We did have a lot of Mexican foreign nationals come to Canada to seek asylum. Those numbers were large. CBSA processed those individuals at ports of entry and was part of security screening and—
Dane Lloyd: I just think Canadians were quite shocked when W5 was doing an article about at least seven cartels operating in Canada. They had not been listed as "designated terrorist entities". Ten years ago I'm not say that there wasn't any activity in Canada, but it seems to have grown over the past 10 years and Canadians are wondering why. What decisions led to that growth in cartel activity in Canada?
Erin O'Gorman: I'm not sure what you mean by "what decisions". I can talk about the asylum numbers, I can talk about CBSA's role—
[…]
Dane Lloyd: […]
Can you please provide the advice or any documentation on the imposition of visas that CBSA might have provided? Is that something that you can provide this committee—any policy information?
Erin O'Gorman: I'll look into it.
Dane Lloyd: We'd appreciate that.
Response:
Visa policy is a responsibility of the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC). Any decisions on the imposition or the lifting of a visa would be led by IRCC and the corresponding regulatory changes required to implement this decision would be approved by the Treasury Board. Since the lifting of the visa for Mexican nationals, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) has routinely provided information on (Annex attached):
- a) the number of Inadmissibility reports, including a breakdown of the number of reports for serious inadmissibilities
- b) the number of Withdrawn Applications at Ports of Entries
- c) the number of Removals
- d) the number of Interceptions Abroad
The CBSA has also provided analysis on passport fraud and border threats that seek to exploit visa exemptions.
Regarding the re-imposition of the Mexico visa in , the advice that CBSA provided to IRCC was included in the Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement published in the Canada Gazette, Part II, Volume 158, Number 6 . As a summary: (a) the number of asylum claims from Mexican nationals exceeded 24,000 in 2023 (representing 18% of Canada's total asylum intake), and (b) the fact that most of these claims were abandoned, withdrawn, or rejected by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. The volume of Mexican claimants impacted processing times at ports of entry, especially at airports. This also compounded pressure on security screening and hearings programs, as CBSA officers intervene at refugee claim hearings at the Refugee Protection Division when required, and also present submissions at admissibility and detention review hearings at the Immigration Division.
Furthermore, the high volume of claims also impacted the CBSA detentions and removals programs. Mexican nationals have been the top group removed from Canada since 2019. This is reflected in the CBSA's published Removals data by citizenship.
| Citizenship/Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Grand total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2,527 | 3,170 | 3,390 | 3,472 | 3,792 | 3,707 | 2,860 | 3,132 | 3,277 | 3,056 | 2,717 | 2,357 | 37,457 |
| 2016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 228 | 228 |
| 2017 | 344 | 369 | 603 | 517 | 713 | 722 | 521 | 565 | 595 | 533 | 419 | 341 | 6,242 |
| 2018 | 278 | 349 | 537 | 823 | 777 | 786 | 665 | 713 | 665 | 614 | 517 | 420 | 7,144 |
| 2019 | 458 | 556 | 744 | 825 | 1,019 | 922 | 528 | 746 | 796 | 516 | 467 | 356 | 7,933 |
| 2020 | 382 | 543 | 448 | 16 | 21 | 27 | 35 | 49 | 63 | 29 | 45 | 27 | 1,685 |
| 2021 | 22 | 8 | 10 | 14 | 39 | 22 | 54 | 67 | 129 | 314 | 384 | 265 | 1,328 |
| 2022 | 358 | 378 | 427 | 572 | 627 | 625 | 544 | 495 | 545 | 607 | 493 | 397 | 6,068 |
| 2023 | 382 | 552 | 621 | 705 | 596 | 603 | 513 | 497 | 484 | 443 | 392 | 323 | 6,111 |
| 2024 | 303 | 415 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 718 |
| Period | Serious Inadmissibility (34-37) | Other Inadmissibilities |
|---|---|---|
| December 1 to 31, 2016 | 22 | 98 |
| 2017 | 217 | 1,496 |
| 2018 | 185 | 2,077 |
| 2019 | 176 | 3,012 |
| 2020 | 61 | 689 |
| 2021 | 91 | 1,008 |
| 2022 | 123 | 2,781 |
| 2023 | 159 | 2,963 |
| 2024 | 44 | 442 |
| Total | 1,078 | 14,566 |
Breakdown of the number of reports by month from to
| Period | Serious Inadmissibility (34-37) | Other Inadmissibilities |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 139 | |
| 10 | 158 | |
| 17 | 161 | |
| 7 | 191 | |
| 16 | 293 | |
| 14 | 249 | |
| 8 | 367 | |
| 12 | 234 | |
| Tablenote 1 | 248 | |
| 10 | 321 | |
| 11 | 245 | |
| 6 | 175 | |
| 14 | 216 | |
| 11 | 276 | |
| 10 | 321 | |
| 9 | 332 | |
| 18 | 252 | |
| 14 | 257 | |
| 13 | 228 | |
| 13 | 230 | |
| 11 | 177 | |
| 20 | 204 | |
| 11 | 276 | |
| 15 | 194 | |
| 23 | 201 | |
| 21 | 241 |
| Period | Total |
|---|---|
| December 1 to 31, 2016 | 72 |
| 2017 | 1,086 |
| 2018 | 1,477 |
| 2019 | 2,108 |
| 2020 | 1,387 |
| 2021 | 1,039 |
| 2022 | 1,755 |
| 2023 | 3,238 |
| 2024 | 728 |
| Total | 12,890 |
Breakdown of the number of removals by month from to
| Period | Total |
|---|---|
| 111 | |
| 120 | |
| 125 | |
| 88 | |
| 123 | |
| 99 | |
| 164 | |
| 148 | |
| 146 | |
| 195 | |
| 225 | |
| 211 | |
| 190 | |
| 258 | |
| 244 | |
| 227 | |
| 242 | |
| 267 | |
| 273 | |
| 300 | |
| 254 | |
| 260 | |
| 354 | |
| 369 | |
| 369 | |
| 359 |
Please note that removals for previous months are updated to include delayed confirmation of departure data entries.
Mexico ranks as the #2 source country of suspected fraud interceptions undertaken by CBSA's International Network in 2024 YTD, accounting for 18% of interceptions.
| Calendar Year / Month | Total |
|---|---|
| 2016 | Tablenote 1 |
| Dec | Tablenote 1 |
| 2017 | 405 |
| Jan | 22 |
| Feb | 27 |
| Mar | 38 |
| Apr | 33 |
| May | 42 |
| Jun | 15 |
| Jul | 17 |
| Aug | 81 |
| Sep | 33 |
| Oct | 25 |
| Nov | 53 |
| Dec | 19 |
| 2018 | 1,751 |
| Jan | 9 |
| Feb | 20 |
| Mar | 27 |
| Apr | 103 |
| May | 137 |
| Jun | 109 |
| Jul | 73 |
| Aug | 171 |
| Sep | 212 |
| Oct | 274 |
| Nov | 296 |
| Dec | 320 |
| 2019 | 5,153 |
| Jan | 207 |
| Feb | 222 |
| Mar | 499 |
| Apr | 384 |
| May | 465 |
| Jun | 380 |
| Jul | 642 |
| Aug | 615 |
| Sep | 496 |
| Oct | 404 |
| Nov | 532 |
| Dec | 307 |
| 2020 | 1,018 |
| Jan | 261 |
| Feb | 373 |
| Mar | 289 |
| Apr | Tablenote 1 |
| May | Tablenote 1 |
| Jun | 6 |
| Jul | 23 |
| Aug | Tablenote 1 |
| Sep | 31 |
| Oct | 9 |
| Nov | Tablenote 1 |
| Dec | 15 |
| 2021 | 1,214 |
| Jan | 12 |
| Feb | Tablenote 1 |
| Mar | Tablenote 1 |
| Apr | Tablenote 1 |
| May | 23 |
| Jun | 45 |
| Jul | 19 |
| Aug | 10 |
| Sep | 98 |
| Oct | 217 |
| Nov | 441 |
| Dec | 343 |
| 2022 | 3,575 |
| Jan | 353 |
| Feb | 372 |
| Mar | 284 |
| Apr | 414 |
| May | 248 |
| Jun | 208 |
| Jul | 135 |
| Aug | 288 |
| Sep | 318 |
| Oct | 288 |
| Nov | 305 |
| Dec | 362 |
| 2023 | 2,017 |
| Jan | 359 |
| Feb | 442 |
| Mar | 336 |
| Apr | 73 |
| May | 120 |
| June | 75 |
| July | 124 |
| August | 132 |
| September | 109 |
| October | 87 |
| November | 93 |
| December | 67 |
| 2024 | 267 |
| January | 54 |
| February | 213 |
| Grand Total | 15,400 |
|
The presented data is based on CBSA International Network officer self-reporting submitted through the NORIS Weekly Operations Report. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. |
|
Undertaking SECU: Training of 200 CBSA officers
Question (excerpt from the meeting transcript)
: Canada – United States Border Management
Claude DeBellefeuille: Yes, we hear them a lot.
Ms. O'Gorman, I have time for one last question.
I've asked the minister this question a number of times. I don't know if the language barrier prevents us from understanding each other. Be that as it may, I would like you to explain everything about the 200 operational staff members. What training are they going to get?
I heard you say that they're not going to get the 18 week training. However, they are investigators and analysts, and they need training.
Erin O'Gorman: Since the interpreters speak better French than I do, I'll answer you in English to make sure I'm clear.
CBSA is charged with making sure that what is coming into the country, be it people or goods. Imports and certain things going out of the country should be coming in and going out. It begins outside of Canada with our liaison officers. We will hire more liaison officers. They are typically drawn from the front line, typically trained at Rigaud, but we're not going to put them into Rigaud tomorrow. We're going to take them from our current complement of people and we will have to backfill them.
At the border, you are all familiar with the people you see when you come into the country, and people at our ports of entry—our uniformed officers who do the 18 weeks at Rigaud. We will not change the 18 weeks. Everybody will get 18 weeks.
When they seize firearms, they are supported by the inland investigators who take those firearms and work with the prosecution, execute warrants and have people go to jail. Those people are typically taken from the front line. We're looking at maybe bringing some people in laterally. There are others with those skill sets. They might have to be replaced via Rigaud— but they will come in.
The Chair: Ms. O'Gorman, since this is a very relevant but somewhat complex question, and the answer won't be satisfactory because of the time constraint, would you agree to provide an answer in writing to Mrs. DeBellefeuille's question?
Erin O'Gorman: Yes, I can do that. Can I just add a little something about how complex the operations are?
The Chair: Yes, you have 10 seconds.
Erin O'Gorman: Our trade officers make sure that aluminum and steel don't come in and get dumped or undervalued in Canada. We have auditors. We take people from universities, we take people from CRA. They are not trained at Rigaud, but they are essential and they are as important to our operations as anybody else because it's protecting what's coming into our country.
There are a lot of moving parts. People are well trained. Our targeting officers don't come from Rigaud, necessarily. They wear uniforms. We try to recruit from the other organizations in the security and intelligence community.
I'm happy to outline that, but it's complex. Some will come from our current front line and will have to be backfilled and some will come from CRA. It's a complicated organization and they're doing an excellent job.
Response:
Approximately 20% of the 1,000 officers will be recruited to work in specialized operational roles across trade, international operations, inland enforcement, criminal investigations, intelligence, targeting and recourse.
Many of these positions, including Inland Enforcement Officers, Criminal Investigators, and Intelligence Officers, will be staffed from within the current Border Services Officers ranks, as these positions require foundational training and are armed positions, requiring specialized defensive tactics training. Other positions, such as National Security Screening Officers, Targeting Officers, Recourse Officers, International Liaison Officers, and Senior Officers in Trade Compliance, may be staffed either from the Border Services Officers workforce or from other external candidates with relevant experience, such as university graduates, security or law enforcement agencies, or the federal public service.
The Canada Border Services Agency has established National Training Standards for frontline and operational positions. These standards define the job-specific training requirements needed for new officers to become proficient in their duties, ensuring all Canada Border Services Agency officers are properly trained and skilled to take on the responsibilities of their work.
When hired, new operational employees start their role with a baseline of experience, knowledge, and skills, as well as certain qualifications. The National Training Standards apply from the time of hiring, ensuring officers meet the requirements of the position and develop skills and competencies over a period of time. They also outline ongoing training requirements that must be retaken on a regular basis (e.g. annual arming recertification or triannual certification).
Formal training requirements vary based on the role and tasks, but include common training such as First Aid, Preventing Racial Profiling at the Frontline, Processing of Indigenous Travellers and their Sacred Goods and job-specific training like Duty Firearm Annual Recertification and Incident Management Intervention Model for all armed officers and more.
Undertaking CIMM: Number of how many failed claimants are in the removal queue
Question (excerpt from the meeting transcript)
- Canada's Immigration System
Brad Redekopp: How many failed claimants linked document fraud rings…fake offers, ghost consultants, that kind of thing, how many are in the removal queue and how many were actually removed in 2024 and 2025?
Aaron McCrorie: If I understand the question, I don't have that data readily at hand.
Brad Redekopp: Is that something you can table with the committee?
Aaron McCrorie: We can certainly see. I can't promise you that we have it, but if we have it, we can certainly provide it.
Response:
As of , 498 failed refugee claimants who have been convicted of a criminal offence, and are in the removals in progress inventory.
The Canada Border Services Agency removed 237 failed refugee claimants who have been convicted of a criminal offence in 2024, and an additional 227 as of November 5 in 2025.
The Canada Border Services Agency's systems do not capture linkages between individuals and document fraud rings, fake offers, or ghost consultants.
Undertaking CIMM: Number of people that are in the removal queue that are convicted of a crime
Question (excerpt from the meeting transcript)
- Canada's Immigration System
Costas Menegakis: How many people with removal orders in Canada have been convicted of a crime?
Aaron McCrorie: I don't have that number readily at hand. If I look in our inventories, I can tell you the number of people…
Costas Menegakis: Could you table that for the committee, please?
Aaron McCrorie: Yes.
Response:
As of , 2,007 foreign nationals with enforceable removal orders are inadmissible due to criminal convictions in Canada and abroad.
Foreign nationals who are found inadmissible due to criminal convictions are the top priority for the Canada Border Services Agency. The Agency removed 742 foreign nationals with criminal convictions in 2024 and 713 as of October 28 in 2025.
CBSA OPQ Responses
Q-171: Temporary public policy and removals
Inquiry of ministry
- By: John Williamson (Saint John-St. Croix)
Question
With regard to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada's temporary public policy, first introduced in , and renewed in , which allows foreign nationals in Canada on closed work permits to change employers or occupations prior to receiving a new work permit: (a) how many foreign nationals have received temporary authorization under this public policy to change employers, or occupations, each year since its inception, broken down by (i) province or territory of employment or residence, (ii) National Occupation Classification code of the original job, (iii) National Occupation Classification code of the new job; (b) what is the average and median processing time for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada to issue an interim authorization email or authorization letter or approval to applicants under this policy in (i) 2020, (ii) 2021, (iii) 2022, (iv) 2023, (v) 2024, (vi) to date in 2025; (c) what is the average time elapsed between receiving interim authorization and the final decision on the underlying work permit application for each month since 2020; (d) how many applications under this policy have been refused or denied since 2020, and for what reasons, broken down by year and month; (e) how many foreign nationals working under this interim policy were later found to have violated the terms of their work authorization or status, and what enforcement actions, if any, were taken by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada or the Canada Border Services Agency; (f) has Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada or Employment and Social Development Canada conducted any economic, labour market, or program integrity analysis of the temporary public policy that allows foreign nationals on closed work permits to change employers or occupations prior to receiving a new permit, including, but not limited to, assessments of (i) its impact on job availability or displacement for Canadian citizens and permanent residents,(ii) its effect on wage levels and working conditions in affected sectors, (iii) any evidence of program misuse, fraud, or employer non-compliance, (iv) any implications for the integrity of the Temporary Foreign Worker Program or International Mobility Program, and, if so, what were the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of these assessments, and will the government table the reports or summaries of findings in the House; (g) what consultations, if any, were conducted prior to the extension of the policy in , and with which stakeholder groups; (h) on what dates were consultations in (g) held, through what formats, and what feedback was provided, broken down by each group; (i) how many foreign nationals who applied under this temporary public policy subsequently submitted asylum claims in Canada, broken down by (i) those whose applications under the policy were refused, (ii) those whose applications under the policy were approved and who were later issued a new work permit, (iii) calendar year and month from 2020 to 2025 to date, (iv) country of citizenship, (v) province or territory where the asylum claim was made (vi) the status or outcome of each claim, categorized as pending, accepted, or rejected?
Response:
Public Safety Canada
Reply by: the Minister of Public Safety
Name of Signatory: Jacques Ramsay, M. P.
Canada Border Services Agency
The CBSA cannot produce and validate a comprehensive response to this question in the time allotted. The level of detail of the information requested is not systematically tracked in a centralized database and would require a manual collection of information.
The CBSA is committed to removing foreign nationals who are deemed inadmissible to Canada pursuant to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, especially those who pose a threat to the safety of Canadians. The CBSA prioritizes removals based on a risk management system that assigns the highest priority to cases involving security, organized crime, crimes against humanity, criminality and persons already subject to removal proceedings. Persons subject to immigration enforcement are afforded due process provided for by legislation, including appeals and judicial reviews, before they can be removed. Once all legislative remedies have been exhausted, inadmissible persons are expected to depart Canada or be subject to removal proceedings. That said, removal efforts may be hindered and delayed by impediments such as uncooperative foreign nationals who do not provide necessary information or documentation to allow for their removal.
Additionally, foreign governments may refuse the return of their nationals or fail to promptly issue timely travel documents. The CBSA works closely with foreign governments, Canadian officials abroad, and other departments to resolve these challenges, and participates in international forums to identify joint strategies and best practices to achieve timely removals of inadmissible persons. The CBSA removed over 18,000 inadmissible people last year – the most in a decade. As part of Canada's Border Plan, the CBSA has committed to increasing the number of removals to 20,000 for the next two years. More information and statistics on removals are available online: Canada Border Services Agency Removals Program Statistics.
Q-186: Removals
Inquiry of ministry
- By: Brad Redekopp (Saskatoon West)
Question
With regard to section 243 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, which requires foreign nationals removed from Canada to repay the removal costs under subsections (a) and (b) if seeking re-entry: (a) what is the total amount recovered by the government for removal costs, broken down by the amounts set out under sections 243(a) and 243(b) and by calendar year since 2016; and (b) how many foreign nationals who were removed at government expense have been denied re-entry for failing to repay removal costs, broken down by sections 243(a) and 243(b) and by calendar year?
Response:
Public Safety Canada
Reply by: the Minister of Public Safety
Name of Signatory: Jacques Ramsay, M. P.
Canada Border Services Agency
The Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations allow for removal costs to be recovered from foreign nationals who seek to return to Canada if these foreign nationals were previously removed at the expense of the Government of Canada. In practice, removal costs are only recovered when a foreign national seeks to return to Canada as there are no mechanisms that would allow the Government of Canada to collect those costs without an existing application to return to Canada. The majority of costs are recovered abroad by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada when foreign nationals previously removed at the expense of the Government submit an application for a temporary or a permanent resident visa, work or study permit or for an electronic travel authorization.
Regulations that came into force on , replaced the geographic-based fee structure for removals to the United States or St. Pierre and Miquelon ($750) and the fee for removals to elsewhere ($1,500) into a single fee for an unescorted removal cost of $3,840 and an escorted removal cost of $12,880. The information requested is provided in the table below; however, the data from previous years is not differentiated between regulations 243(a) and 243(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations. The Canada Border Services Agency's annual fees report mandated by the Service Fees Act includes these amounts. Due to the new regulations which took effect on , the total for the 2025 calendar year cannot be provided as it is not yet available.
Calendar Year Total Amount Recovered (in Canadian Dollars) 2016 $384,750 2017 $461,250 2018 $441,750 2019 $454,500 2020 $231,750 2021 $306,000 2022 $390,000 2023 $538,500 2024 $527,211 - The requested information cannot be provided as the Canada Border Services Agency does not collect or track information pertaining to the number of foreign nationals denied re-entry for failing to repay the removal cost outlined in regulation 243(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations.
Q-187: Removal of persons
Inquiry of ministry
- By: Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill)
Question
With regard to the removal of persons by the Canada Border Services Agency, since : (a) how many persons subject to removal have departed or been removed from Canada, broken down by year; (b) what is the number of 'high-priority foreign nationals' subject to removal orders on grounds of serious inadmissibility, broken down by year and relevant Immigration and Refugee Protection Act section on inadmissibility; (c) of those in (b), how many were actually removed from Canada, broken down by year and relevant Immigration and Refugee Protection Act section on inadmissibility; (d) how many persons who are subject to removal orders on grounds of serious inadmissibility have not yet been removed, broken down by year, reason for non-removal, and relevant Immigration and Refugee Protection Act section on inadmissibility; and (e) regarding those in (d), how does the Canada Border Services Agency plan to find and remove these persons from Canada?
Response:
Public Safety Canada
Reply by: the Minister of Public Safety
Name of Signatory: Jacques Ramsay, M. P.
Canada Border Services Agency
(a)-(d) The requested information is provided in Annex 1.
More information and statistics on removals are available online: Canada Border Services Agency Removals Program Statistics.
CBSA Inland Enforcement Officers undertake proactive investigations in an attempt to locate and arrest individuals subject to immigration warrants, including those wanted for removal. Investigations are triaged, ensuring high risk cases are prioritized. The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act provides for the issuance of a warrant and the arrest and detention of an inadmissible person whom an officer (based on reasonable grounds) believes is: inadmissible, a danger to the public, and/or is unlikely to appear for an immigration process, including removal. Once individuals are located and arrested, they may be detained when grounds for detention exist, such as individuals who represent a public safety risk.
The CBSA is mandated to remove foreign nationals who are subject to an enforceable removal order. The CBSA prioritizes removals based on a risk management system that assigns the highest priority to cases involving security, organized crime, crimes against humanity, and criminality, for the safety and security of Canada and its citizens. The CBSA works diligently to resolve impediments to removal and advance these cases through the enforcement continuum as quickly as possible to support the integrity of the immigration program. Impediments to removal include, but are not limited to: uncooperative foreign nationals who do not provide necessary information or documentation to allow for their removal; foreign governments that may refuse the return of their nationals or fail to promptly issue timely travel documents; and, the inability to use commercial airlines due to their lack of flights to certain destinations, their limits on the number of deportees per flight, or refusal to transport foreign nationals with criminality. The CBSA works closely with foreign governments, Canadian officials abroad, and other departments to resolve these challenges, and participates in international forums to identify joint strategies and best practices to achieve timely removals of inadmissible persons.
The CBSA removed over 18,000 inadmissible people from , to – the most in a decade. The 2024 Fall Economic Statement proposed to provide the CBSA with $55.5 million, as part of Canada's Border Plan, to increase the number of removals to 20,000 for Fiscal Year 2025–2026 and Fiscal Year 2026–2027. A Removals Action Plan has been developed to ensure the funding is used to achieve this removals target.
| Removal year | Total |
|---|---|
| 2016 (From January 1) | 7,636 |
| 2017 | 8,745 |
| 2018 | 8,383 |
| 2019 | 11,270 |
| 2020 | 12,852 |
| 2021 | 7,514 |
| 2022 | 8,324 |
| 2023 | 15,206 |
| 2024 | 17,364 |
| 2025 (up to ) | 9,863 |
| Removal order issued by year | Security (section 34) | Human or international rights violations (section 35) | Serious criminality (section 36) | Organized criminality (section 37) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 (From January 1) | 12 | Tablenote 1 | 995 | 24 |
| 2017 | 18 | Tablenote 1 | 1,044 | 33 |
| 2018 | 45 | 5 | 960 | 64 |
| 2019 | 39 | Tablenote 1 | 985 | 53 |
| 2020 | 13 | 8 | 651 | 12 |
| 2021 | 22 | 7 | 829 | 23 |
| 2022 | 31 | 9 | 753 | 33 |
| 2023 | 25 | 6 | 1,041 | 55 |
| 2024 | 43 | 22 | 1,416 | 99 |
| 2025 (up to ) | 16 | 17 | 690 | 44 |
| Removal year | Security (section 34) | Human or international rights violations (section 35) | Serious criminality (section 36) | Organized criminality (section 37) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 (From January 1) | 8 | Tablenote 1 | 775 | 22 |
| 2017 | 5 | 0 | 835 | 41 |
| 2018 | 18 | Tablenote 1 | 745 | 88 |
| 2019 | 13 | Tablenote 1 | 680 | 64 |
| 2020 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 415 | 22 |
| 2021 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 418 | 25 |
| 2022 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 432 | 32 |
| 2023 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | 501 | 55 |
| 2024 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 515 | 78 |
| 2025 (up to ) | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 122 | 28 |
| (i) Year Removal Order issued | (iii) Immigration and Refugee Protection Act inadmissibility section | (ii) No action requiredTablenote 4 | (ii) PausedTablenote 4 | (ii) Wanted | (ii) Removal in progress |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 (From January 1) | Serious Criminality (section 36) | 31 | 68 | 22 | 38 |
| Human or International Rights Violations (section 35) | 0 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Organized Criminality (section 37) | 0 | 5 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | |
| Security (section 34) | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | Tablenote 1 | |
| 2017 | Serious Criminality (section 36) | 30 | 75 | 18 | 23 |
| Human or International Rights Violations (section 35) | Tablenote 1 | 0 | 0 | Tablenote 1 | |
| Organized Criminality (section 37) | 0 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | |
| Security (section 34) | Tablenote 1 | 8 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | |
| 2018 | Serious Criminality (section 36) | 23 | 85 | 18 | 40 |
| Human or International Rights Violations (section 35) | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | |
| Organized Criminality (section 37) | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | |
| Security (section 34) | Tablenote 1 | 16 | Tablenote 1 | 7 | |
| 2019 | Serious Criminality (section 36) | 41 | 124 | 27 | 56 |
| Human or International Rights Violations (section 35) | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Organized Criminality (section 37) | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | |
| Security (section 34) | 9 | 11 | 0 | Tablenote 1 | |
| 2020 | Serious Criminality (section 36) | 24 | 104 | 26 | 43 |
| Human or International Rights Violations (section 35) | Tablenote 1 | 5 | 0 | Tablenote 1 | |
| Organized Criminality (section 37) | 0 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security (section 34) | Tablenote 1 | 5 | 0 | Tablenote 1 | |
| 2021 | Serious Criminality (section 36) | 31 | 181 | 31 | 74 |
| Human or International Rights Violations (section 35) | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | Tablenote 1 | |
| Organized Criminality (section 37) | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security (section 34) | Tablenote 1 | 7 | 0 | 5 | |
| 2022 | Serious Criminality (section 36) | 25 | 170 | 30 | 70 |
| Human or International Rights Violations (section 35) | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | Tablenote 1 | |
| Organized Criminality (section 37) | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | Tablenote 1 | |
| Security (section 34) | 6 | 10 | Tablenote 1 | 8 | |
| 2023 | Serious Criminality (section 36) | 67 | 293 | 56 | 110 |
| Human or International Rights Violations (section 35) | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| Organized Criminality (section 37) | 0 | Tablenote 1 | Tablenote 1 | 3 | |
| Security (section 34) | Tablenote 1 | 12 | 0 | 5 | |
| 2024 | Serious Criminality (section 36) | 150 | 437 | 73 | 214 |
| Human or International Rights Violations (section 35) | Tablenote 1 | 9 | Tablenote 1 | 5 | |
| Organized Criminality (section 37) | 2 | 11 | Tablenote 1 | 8 | |
| Security (section 34) | 11 | 16 | 0 | 14 | |
| 2025 (up to ) | Serious Criminality (section 36) | 141 | 203 | 18 | 148 |
| Human or International Rights Violations (section 35) | 5 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | 8 | |
| Organized Criminality (section 37) | Tablenote 1 | 9 | Tablenote 1 | 7 | |
| Security (section 34) | 5 | Tablenote 1 | 0 | 7 |
In order to more clearly describe the types of cases subject removal orders that have not been enforced or voided, the Canada Border Services Agency has amended the inventory names and descriptions. The cohorts of each inventory has not changed.
1) The No Action Required inventory (previously known as the Monitoring inventory) includes: individuals that fall outside of the enforcement stream. These include, but are not limited to, those awaiting refugee determinations and convention refugees.
2) The Paused inventory (previously known as the Stay inventory) includes: individuals that cannot currently be removed. These include, but are not limited to those with pending Federal Court appeals; criminal charges; Pre-Removal Risk Assessments; and sentence of imprisonment.
3) The Wanted inventory includes: individuals who failed to appear for removal proceedingsection In these cases, the Canada Border Services Agency actively works to locate the foreign national.
4) The Removal In Progress inventory (previously known as the Working inventory) includes: individuals who can be processed for removal. At this stage, The Canada Border Services Agency works with the individual and foreign countries to overcome challenges to removal, including but not limited to, the issuance of travel documents.
Q-260: Hiring CBSA personnel and border plan
Inquiry of ministry
- By: David McKenzie (Calgary Signal Hill)
Question
With regard to Canada's announcement that the Canada Border Services Agency will hire over 1000 new and additional Canada Border Services Agency personnel: (a) as of , how many of the new 1000 personnel that will be hired have been hired and are operational; (b) by what date will the government reach its target of hiring 1000 additional Canada Border Services Agency personnel; (c) by what date will all 1000 new Canada Border Services Agency personnel be functionally operational; (d) as of , how many full-time equivalent positions within the Canada Border Services Agency are unfilled, broken down by (i) Canada Border Services Agency region, (ii) Canada Border Services Agency department or branch; and (e) of the 1000 new Canada Border Services Agency personnel that will be hired, how many does the government currently expect will be assigned to Canada Border Services Agency headquarters, broken down by headquarters branch, including the (i) president's office, (ii) Canada Border Services Agency Assessment and Revenue Management's Internal Task Force, (iii) Commercial and Trade Branch, (iv) Communications, Parliamentary and Public Affairs Branch, (v) Finance and Corporate Management Branch, (vi) Human Resources Branch, (vii) Information, Science and Technology Branch, (viii) Intelligence and Enforcement Branch, (ix) Internal Audit and Program Evaluation Directorate, (x) Legal Services, Recourse, Standards and Program Integrity Branch, (xi) Strategic Policy Branch, (xii) Travellers Branch?
Response:
Public Safety Canada
Reply by: the Minister of Public Safety
Name of Signatory: Jacques Ramsay, M. P.
Canada Border Services Agency
(a) (b) (c) (e) As of , the information requested cannot be provided as the Canada Border Services Agency is currently developing a plan with options for consideration by the Government of Canada.
(d) The Canada Border Services Agency cannot produce and validate a comprehensive response to this question in the time allotted. The level of detail of the information requested is not systematically tracked in a centralized database and would require a manual collection of information.
Q-337: Illegal workers
Inquiry of ministry
- By: Kelly McCauley (Edmonton West)
Question
With regard to the Canada Border Services Agency: how many raids, conducted in the last five fiscal years, have found illegal workers on sites that were fully or partially funded by the government, and for each such raid, what were the details, including the (i) number of illegal workers found, (ii) city and province, (iii) date, (iv) name of the company or companies carrying out the federally funded work, (v) specific federal infrastructure program under which the project was funded?
Response:
Public Safety Canada
Reply by: the Minister of Public Safety
Name of Signatory: Jacques Ramsay, M. P.
Canada Border Services Agency
The Canada Border Services Agency, under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, investigates foreign nationals who engage in unauthorized employment and those that employ them. The Agency does not investigate nor track whether or not worker sites receive government funding.
Q-391: Temporary resident visas
Inquiry of ministry
- By: Laila Goodridge (Fort McMurray-Cold Lake)
Question
With regard to temporary resident visas, since 2022 and broken down by year: (a) how many individuals in Canada on temporary resident visas fled Canada after allegedly committing a crime; (b) of those who fled, how many fled (i) while a charge was pending, (ii) after being charged, but prior to a verdict, (iii) after being convicted, but before completing their sentence; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) and (b) by type of visa and by type of criminal offense; (c) how many visas has the government revoked after the visa holder fled the country; and (d) how many visas has the government revoked following a criminal charge or conviction, broken down by type of visa and type of criminal (i) charge, (ii) conviction?
Response:
Public Safety Canada
Reply by: the Minister of Public Safety
Name of Signatory: Jacques Ramsay, M. P.
Canada Border Services Agency
The Canada Border Services Agency collects exit information (name; date of birth; citizenship or nationality; gender; travel document details; and date, time and location of departure) through information-sharing arrangements with the United States for travellers crossing at land borders, and from air carriers that are required to submit passenger manifests for international flights departing Canada. While the Canada Border Services Agency may question anyone leaving Canada, Canada's outbound border control does not systematically require all exiting travellers to confirm their departure or to present to an officer for examination in the same way that they must when entering.
When the Canada Border Services Agency receives information on temporary resident visas holders who are charged criminally, the Canada Border Services Agency will monitor the case pending the final disposition of criminal charge(s). If the charge(s) result in a conviction, the Canada Border Services Agency will conduct an admissibility determination which may result in a finding of inadmissibility on criminality grounds (i.e., in-Canada convictions) and removal from Canada. The Canada Border Services Agency does not centrally track this information, therefore a manual analysis of individual client files would be necessary and this cannot be done in the time allotted. The Canada Border Services Agency does centrally track cases of foreign nationals who are subject to ongoing immigration proceedings, those who have removal orders issued against them, those who are subject to immigration warrants, and those who are inadmissible due to criminal convictions. Foreign nationals who are found inadmissible due to criminal convictions are the top priority for the Canada Border Services Agency.
Q-441: Border service hires
Inquiry of ministry
- By: Frank Caputo (Kamloops-Thompson-Nicola)
Question
With regard to the government's commitment to hire 1,000 more Canada Border Services Agency personnel: (a) how many of the 1,000 are planned to be for border management; (b) how many of the 1,000 are planned to be for border enforcement; and (c) how many of the 1,000 are planned to be for internal services?
Response:
Public Safety Canada
Reply by: the Minister of Public Safety
Name of Signatory: Jacques Ramsay, M. P.
Canada Border Services Agency
The Canada Border Services Agency will recruit, train, and deploy 1,000 new Canada Border Services Agency officers. These officers will be focused on border management. They will include Border Services Officers at ports of entry, targeting and intelligence officers, inland enforcement officers, including for removals, criminal investigators, officers for trade remedy investigations, compliance verification, Market Watch and recourse, and international liaison officers.
This investment is not going towards internal services, which will be absorbed by the Canada Border Services Agency.
Q-444: Exit Entry Program
Inquiry of ministry
- By: Brad Redekopp (Saskatoon West)
Question
With regard to the statement made at the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, on , by Uyen Hoang, Director General, Citizenship Branch, at the Department of Citizenship and Immigration, that "we do have a program called entry and exit, […] there are mechanisms in place in order to know when an individual is leaving a country": (a) what department, agency, police force or combination thereof, is responsible for this program; (b) when did this program come into effect; (c) from which countries does this program track exit and entry data; (d) from the start of the program, or the 2015–2016 fiscal year, whichever is oldest, what is the annual level of funding for the program; (e) from the start of the program, or the 2015–2016 fiscal year, whichever is oldest, how many full-time equivalents are assigned to work under the program umbrella; (f) how does the program collect exit numbers; (g) what companies are contracted or subcontracted to execute this program, and what is the value of the each contract awarded to contractors or subcontractors; (h) from the start of the program, or the 2015–2016 fiscal year, whichever is oldest, and broken down by each border crossing and mode, how many people exited the country, and of those people, how many were (i) Canadians, (ii) non-Canadians; (i) what are the details of the non-Canadians who exited the country in (h)(ii), including (i) on which permits were they previously allowed entry into the country, (ii) which permits were no longer valid at the time of their exit; and (j) what percentage of temporary residents are identified as having overstayed their lawful period of entry in Canada?
Response:
Public Safety Canada
Reply by: the Minister of Public Safety
Name of Signatory: Jacques Ramsay, M. P.
Canada Border Services Agency
(a) what department, agency, police force or combination thereof, is responsible for this program?
The Canada Border Services Agency is responsible for the Entry/Exit Program.
(b) when did this program come into effect?
In the land mode, the Canada Border Services Agency has been collecting Entry/Exit information since July, 2019.
In the air mode, the Canada Border Services Agency has been collecting Entry/Exit information since June, 2020.
(c) from which countries does this program track exit and entry data?
The Entry/Exit program does not operate based on specific countries. In the land mode, the Canada Border Services Agency exchanges biographic entry and exit information with the United States.
In the air mode, the Canada Border Services Agency receives information from all commercial air carriers, collected from carrier passenger manifests and is not limited to any specific country.
(d) from the start of the program, or the 2015–2016 fiscal year, whichever is oldest, what is the annual level of funding for the program?
The Entry/Exit Program was established in 2021 following the closure of the Entry/Exit Project. Since the start of the program, the financial allocations have been as follows. All figures represent total Canada Border Services Agency allocations specific to the Entry/Exit Program
| Fiscal year | Annual funding ($) |
|---|---|
| 2020–2021 | 9,587,262 |
| 2021–2022 | 9,654,573 |
| 2022–2023 | 9,558,374 |
| 2023–2024 | 9,478,014 |
| 2024–2025 | 8,911,176 |
| 2025–2026 | 8,479,366 |
(e) from the start of the program, or the 2015–2016 fiscal year, whichever is oldest, how many full-time equivalents are assigned to work under the program umbrella;
The Entry/Exit Program was established in 2021 following the closure of the Entry/Exit Project. Since the start of the program, the full-time equivalent assigned to work under the program umbrella is as follows:
| Fiscal year | Number of full-time equivalents |
|---|---|
| 2020–2021 | 25.20 |
| 2021–2022 | 42.78 |
| 2022–2023 | 43.46 |
| 2023–2024 | 44.05 |
| 2024–2025 | 44.28 |
| 2025–2026 | Not available at time of response. Information can only be confirmed at year end against timesheets. |
(f) how does the program collect exit numbers;
At a land border crossings, Canada receives entry information from United States authorities. The Canada Border Services Agency uses this information to create the Canadian exit record.
The Canada Border Services Agency also collects exit information directly from air carriers through passenger manifests in the air mode.
(g) what companies are contracted or subcontracted to execute this program, and what is the value of the each contract awarded to contractors or subcontractors;
The Canada Border Services Agency executes the Entry/Exit program and does not contract it out.
(h) from the start of the program, or the 2015–2016 fiscal year, whichever is oldest, and broken down by each border crossing and mode, how many people exited the country, and of those people? how many were (i) Canadians? (ii) non-Canadians?
Exit information is collected by the Canada Border Services Agency through two primary methods. In the land mode, the Canada Border Services Agency has received complete exit data from the United States Customs and Border Protection since , when full implementation began. In the air mode, exit data has been collected from commercial air carriers starting .
[Excel]
(i) For non-Canadians who exited: (i) permits held for entry? (ii) permits no longer valid at exit?
The Canada Border Services Agency does not maintain aggregate data identifying the specific immigration permits held by non-Canadians at the time of entry or whether those permits remained valid at the time of exit.
Producing this level of detail would require a manual reconciliation of multiple systems, which is not feasible in the time allotted.
(j) What percentage of temporary residents are identified as having overstayed their lawful period of entry in Canada?
The Canada Border Services Agency does not have aggregate data to determine the percentage of temporary residents who have overstayed their authorized period of stay in Canada. Overstay cases are identified and assessed on a case-by-case basis through enforcement and immigration processes.
Producing this level of detail would require a manual reconciliation of multiple systems, which is not feasible in the time allotted.
Q-450: Canada wide arrest warrant
Inquiry of ministry
- By: The Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill)
Question
With regard to the Canada Border Services Agency, since , and the list of those who have been determined to be inadmissible to Canada and are the subject of an active Canada-wide arrest warrant, issued pursuant to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act: (a) what are the details of individuals on the up-to-date wanted list, including, for each, (i) their name, (ii) the reason for their inadmissibility, (iii) their immigration status, (iv) the number of days they have been on the list; (b) for those who have been on this wanted list previously, what were their outcomes, broken down by (i) name, (ii) date of arrest, (iii) how long they were wanted by the government prior to their arrests; and (c) how many of those on the wanted list have been on this list for over one year, and what are the details, including the (i) total number, (ii) breakdown by year?
Response:
Public Safety Canada
Reply by: the Minister of Public Safety
Name of Signatory: Jacques Ramsay, M. P.
Canada Border Services Agency
Canada Border Services Agency officers may issue warrants for the arrest and detention of a permanent resident or foreign national if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person is inadmissible pursuant to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and poses a danger to the public or is unlikely to appear for an immigration proceeding, such as an examination, an admissibility hearing, or a removal from Canada.
When Canada Border Services Agency officers encounter a person subject to an immigration warrant they will confirm the warrant's validity and the person's identity before proceeding with an arrest.
In certain circumstances, warrants may be cancelled when they no longer are appropriate or necessary. For example, if the Canada Border Services Agency has received credible information that the subject of the warrant has departed Canada is deceased or if the original reasons for the warrant issuance have changed.
a) what are the details of individuals on the up-to-date wanted list, including, for each, (i) their name?
In processing Parliamentary Returns, the government applies the principles set out in the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. As such, the names of persons subject to an active immigration warrant have been withheld on the grounds that this constitutes personal information.
a) what are the details of individuals on the up-to-date wanted list, including, for each, (ii) the reason for their inadmissibility, (iii) their immigration status?
[Excel]
Further information on inadmissibilities under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act is available on Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada's website.
a) what are the details of individuals on the up-to-date wanted list, including, for each, (iv) the number of days they have been on the list?
[Excel]
(b) for those who have been on this wanted list previously, what were their outcomes, broken down by (i) name?
In processing Parliamentary Returns, the government applies the principles set out in the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. As such, the names of persons subject to an active immigration warrant have been withheld on the grounds that this constitutes personal information.
(b) for those who have been on this wanted list previously, what were their outcomes, broken down by (ii) date of arrest, (iii) how long they were wanted by the government prior to their arrests?
[Excel]
In certain circumstances, Canada Border Services Agency may cancel warrants when they no longer are appropriate or necessary. For example, warrants may be cancelled if the Canada Border Services Agency has received credible information that the person subject of the warrant has departed Canada or that the person is deceased, or if the original reasons for the warrant issuance have changed.
Information on the warrants cancelled, including date of warrant issuance, date of warrant cancellation and the number of days from warrant issuance to warrant cancellation appears in the table below.
[Excel]
(c) how many of those on the wanted list have been on this list for over one year, and what are the details, including the (i) total number, (ii) breakdown by year?
| Year of warrant issuance | Number of active warrants |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 473 |
| 2017 | 636 |
| 2018 | 1,027 |
| 2019 | 1,473 |
| 2020 | 426 |
| 2021 | 658 |
| 2022 | 1,163 |
| 2023 | 2,736 |
| 2024 | 1,271 |
| 2025 (As of ) | 188 |
| Total | 10,051 |
In addition, please note the number of warrants closed (executed and cancelled) since 2016:
| (ii) Year of Warrant Closure | Number of Warrants Executed | Number of Warrants Cancelled | (i)Total of Closed Warrants (Executed + Cancelled) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016Tablenote 1 | 216 | 86 | 302 |
| 2017Tablenote 1 | 548 | 138 | 686 |
| 2018 | 757 | 295 | 1,052 |
| 2019 | 936 | 397 | 1,333 |
| 2020 | 498 | 162 | 660 |
| 2021 | 525 | 173 | 698 |
| 2022 | 1,063 | 315 | 1,378 |
| 2023 | 1,302 | 405 | 1,707 |
| 2024 | 1,251 | 341 | 1,592 |
| 2025 (up to ) | 741 | 164 | 905 |
Q-481: Deportation letters
Inquiry of ministry
- By: Tony Baldinelli (Niagara Falls-Niagara-on-the-Lake)
Question
With regard to deportation letters sent out by the government, broken down by year since : (a) how many individuals were sent deportation letters by the government; and (b) of the individuals in (a), how many (i) self-deported or left the country voluntarily, (ii) were deported by officers or enforcement agents, (iii) currently remain in Canada?
Response:
Public Safety Canada
Reply by: the Minister of Public Safety
Name of Signatory: Jacques Ramsay, M. P.
Canada Border Services Agency
The Canada Border Service Agency undertook a search to gather the data necessary to respond to this question. In doing so, system limitations were identified that led to the conclusion that producing and validating a comprehensive response in the time allotted could lead to the disclosure of incomplete and misleading information.
Page details
- Date modified: