Notice of conclusion of administrative review: Large Line Pipe (LLP 2025 UP1)
Ottawa,
The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) has concluded an administrative review of the normal values and export prices of certain welded large diameter carbon and alloy steel line pipe originating in or exported from Japan by Marubeni Itochu Steel Inc.
The administrative review is part of the CBSA’s enforcement of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal’s (CITT) order issued on August 3, 2022.
The product definition and the applicable tariff classification numbers of the goods subject to the CITT’s order can be found on the CBSA’s Large line pipe: Measures in force.
Period of investigation
The period of investigation (POI) and the profitability analysis period (PAP) for the administrative review was from November 1, 2023 to October 31, 2024.
Administrative review process
At the initiation of the administrative review, the CBSA sent a request for information (RFI) to all known importers, exporters, producers and vendors to solicit information on the costs and selling prices of subject goods and like goods. The information was requested for purposes of updating the normal values and export prices for subject goods imported into Canada.
As part of the administrative review, case briefs and reply submissions were provided by counsel representing the Canadian industry, exporter and importer. Details of the representations are provided in Appendix 1.
Details pertaining to the information submitted by the exporter and producer in response to the RFIs as well as the results of the CBSA’s administrative review are provided below.
Normal values and export prices
Marubeni-Itochu Steel Inc is an exporter of subject goods and is located in Japan. During the POI, Marubeni-Itochu Steel Inc purchased the subject goods that it exported to Canada from unassociated Japanese producer.
Marubeni-Itochu Steel Inc provided a response to the CBSA’s dumping RFI. Supplemental RFI were sent to Marubeni-Itochu Steel Inc to gather additional information and to seek clarification for certain questions. The producer of the goods provided the CBSA with information on the production of the subject goods exported by Marubeni Itochu Steel Inc., including responses to the CBSA’s dumping RFI and supplemental RFIs. Officers of the CBSA met with representatives of the producer of the goods at their offices in Japan to verify the information provided.
Marubeni-Itochu Steel Inc did not have domestic sales of like goods during the PAP and therefore normal values could not be determined in accordance with section 15 of SIMA. Normal values were determined pursuant to paragraph 19(b) of SIMA, based on the aggregate of the cost of production of the goods, a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and all other costs, and a reasonable amount for profits. The CBSA received a complete response from the producer and was able to calculate the cost of production of the goods. An amount for administrative, selling and all other costs was calculated for both the producer and the exporter. Amounts for profits were calculated in accordance with subparagraph 11(1)(b)(vi) of the SIMR, based on the weighted average profits of the Japanese producer on sales of welded pipe that were made in the country of export during the PAP.
Since all sales of subject goods exported to Canada by Marubeni-Itochu Steel Inc during the POI were sold to Canadian customers via a related importer, a reliability test was performed to determine whether the section 24 export prices were reliable as envisaged by SIMA. This test was conducted by comparing the section 24 export prices with the section 25 export prices. The test revealed that the export prices determined in accordance with section 24 were reliable, therefore, export prices were determined in accordance with section 24 of SIMA.
Exporter responsibility
All parties are cautioned that, where there are increases in domestic prices and/or costs, the export price should be increased accordingly to ensure that any sale made to Canada is not only above the normal value but at or above selling prices and full costs and profit of the goods in the exporter’s domestic market. If exporters do not adjust export prices accordingly, retroactive assessments of anti-dumping duties may be warranted. Please refer to the Memorandum D14-1-8: Administrative Review Policy – Special Import Measures Act (SIMA) for details.
Importer responsibility
Importers are reminded that it is their responsibility to calculate and declare their anti-dumping and countervailing duty liability. If importers are using the services of a customs broker to clear importations, the brokerage firm should be advised that the goods are subject to anti-dumping and countervailing measures and be provided with sufficient information necessary to clear the shipments. To determine their liability for anti-dumping and countervailing duty, importers should contact the exporters to obtain the applicable normal values and amounts of subsidy. For further information on this matter, refer to Memorandum D14-1-2: Disclosure of normal values, export prices, and amounts of subsidy established under the Special Import Measures Act.
The Customs Act applies, with any modifications that the circumstances require, with respect to the accounting and payment of anti-dumping and countervailing duties. As such, failure to pay the duties within the prescribed time will result in the application of the interest provisions of the Act.
Should the importer disagree with the determination made on any importation of goods, a request for re-determination may be filed. For more information on how to file a request for re-determination, please refer to the Guide for appealing a duty assessment.
Contact us
Appendix 1: Representations
Representations
During the course of the administrative review, counsel for the Canadian industryFootnote 1, exporter and importerFootnote 2 discussed various concerns pertaining to the responses to the RFIs and SRFIs. Issues raised included: cost of production reporting methodologies, amounts for profits, export price and other various alleged inconsistencies and deficiencies within the responses.
There were a number of exporter, producer and importer specific issues that were raised. In order to respect the confidentiality designations made by interested parties, the CBSA is limited in the information that can be divulged in response to arguments made concerning certain topics.
CBSA response
Due consideration has been given to submissions on the topics raised in case briefs on a case by case basis and appropriate adjustments were made, as applicable, in accordance with SIMA and SIMR. Additional information on the calculation of normal values is provided to exporters in the confidential exporter conclusion letters.
Page details
- Date modified: