Trade compliance verifications
Notice for importers: Cannabis
Despite legalization in Canada, only Health Canada retains the authority to issue permits or grant exemptions to import or export cannabis, under very limited circumstances. For importers with the Health Canada granted authority, please refer to Customs Notice 18-19 on calculating cannabis duty and additional cannabis duty imposed on packaged cannabis products. For more information, consult cannabis (marijuana) legalization.
This document is also available in PDF (1.5 MB) [help with PDF files]
Archived
Related link
Contact
- If you have any questions regarding this list, please send an email to: tcqa.ocaq@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca.
The CBSA manages trade compliance with the Tariff Classification, Valuation, and Origin programs using the following two post-release verification processes:
- Random verifications
- Verification priorities
Random verifications
Random verifications are designed to measure compliance rates and revenue loss and the results may be used for many purposes, including:
- risk assessment
- revenue assessment
- promoting voluntary compliance
Verification priorities
Targeted verification priorities are determined through a risk-based, evergreen process, meaning that new targets are added throughout the year. Verification priorities may also be carried over from previous years. The current verification priorities are:
Tariff Classification
Furniture for non-domestic purposes (Round 3)
Harmonized System Number(s): Headings 94.01 and 94.03
Harmonized System Number(s): Headings 94.01 and 94.03
- Headings 94.01 (Seats) and 94.03 (Other furniture and parts thereof) classify furniture for domestic purposes or other furniture for non-domestic purposes. The risk identified is that goods may be misclassified as furniture for non-domestic purposes, which is duty-free, instead of furniture for domestic purposes, which attracts a duty rate up to 9.5%.
- This verification priority was released in , and is now complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 25 | 15 | 60% | $337,663 | $594,090 | $1,050 | $932,803 |
- A second round of verifications was released in , and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 27 | 26 | 96% | $148,431 | $1,366,935 | $56,300 | $1,571,666 |
- A third round of verifications was released in . Results are not yet available.
- The results of the first two rounds show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified as furniture for domestic purposes.
Batteries (Round 3)
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 85.06
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 85.06
- The risk identified is that batteries may be misclassified under duty-free tariff items within Heading 85.06, whereas they should be properly classified under other tariff items within the same heading, and be subject to a duty rate of 7%.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
- A second round of verifications was released in and is also complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1-2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 26 | 25 | 96% | $43,185 | $152,549 | $11,100 | $206,834 |
- A third round of verifications was released in , and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 3) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 9 | 9 | 100% | $9,258 | $40,886 | $29,450 | $79,594 |
- The results of the first three rounds show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified under tariff item 8506.10.90 of the Customs Tariff.
Footwear ($30 or more per pair) (Round 4)
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 64.03
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 64.03
- The risk identified is that footwear subject to a duty rate of 18% could be misclassified under other related tariff items, such as women’s footwear valued at $30 or more per pair, which attracts a duty rate of 11%.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 100% | $37,934 | $526,674 | $19,850 | $584,558 |
- A second round of verifications was released in , a third one in , and a fourth one in , and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Rounds 2-3-4) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 185 | 168 | 123 | 66% | $382,188 | $1,734,841 | $128,100 | $2,245,129 |
- The results of the four rounds show that the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified under various tariff items of Heading 64.03 of the Customs Tariff.
Articles of apparel and clothing accessories (Round 3)
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 39.26
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 39.26
- The risk identified is that goods could be incorrectly classified within Heading 39.26, which attracts lower duty rates, instead of being properly classified under tariff item 6210.40.90 (other men's or boys' garments) or 6210.50.90 (other women's or girls' garments), which are subject to the significantly higher duty rate of 18%.
- The issue is that clothing containing a layer of plastic, combined with textile fabric that is not considered as reinforcement to the plastic, should not be classified under Chapter 39.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134 | 134 | 96 | 72% | $971,750 | $1,796,608 | $39,100 | $2,807,458 |
- A second round of verifications was released in , and a third one in , and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Rounds 2-3) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71 | 67 | 52 | 78% | $229,024 | $329,622 | $19,100 | $577,746 |
- The results of the first three rounds show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified under various tariff items within Chapters 42, 61, 62 and 65 of the Customs Tariff.
Articles of plastics (Round 3)
Harmonized System Number(s): Subheading 3926.90
Harmonized System Number(s): Subheading 3926.90
- The risk identified is that articles of plastics could be incorrectly classified within Heading 39.26, instead of being properly classified elsewhere within the same Heading, and potentially be subject to a duty rate of 6.5%.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
- A second round of verifications was released in and is also complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1-2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 22 | 21 | 95% | $111,838 | $348,241 | $34,600 | $494,679 |
- A third round of verifications was released in , and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 3) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 33% | $3,075 | $25,405 | $1,500 | $29,980 |
- The results of the first three rounds show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified elsewhere within Chapter 39 of the Customs Tariff.
Parts of lamps (Round 3)
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 94.05
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 94.05
- The risk identified is that imported goods could be incorrectly classified as parts of lamps, within Heading 94.05, instead of being properly classified elsewhere within the same Heading, or under other Chapters, and potentially be subject to various duty rates.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | 57 | 43 | 75% | $147,970 | $787,232 | $17,250 | $952,452 |
- A second round of verifications was released in and a third one in . The results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Rounds 2-3) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150 | 103 | 67 | 65% | $202,225 | $898,201 | $45,850 | $1,146,276 |
- The results of the first three rounds show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified within Heading 94.05 or under Chapters 73, 76, 84 and 85 of the Customs Tariff.
Pasta (Round 2)
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 19.02
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 19.02
- The risk identified is that pasta could be incorrectly classified within Heading 19.02, which is subject to various duty rates, instead of being properly classified elsewhere within the same Heading, and potentially be subject to higher duty rates.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
- A second round of verifications was released in and is also complete.
| Targeted companies (Rounds 1-2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 136 | 136 | 96 | 71% | $149,530 | $1,226,372 | $117,475 | $1,493,377 |
- A third round of verifications was released in . Results are not yet available.
- The results of the first two rounds show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified elsewhere within Heading 19.02 of the Customs Tariff.
Cell phone cases (Round 2)
Harmonized System Number(s): Headings 39.26, 42.02 and 85.17
Harmonized System Number(s): Headings 39.26, 42.02 and 85.17
- The risk identified is that cell phone cases could be incorrectly classified under various tariff items within Headings 39.26, 42.02 and 85.17, whereas the goods could potentially be properly classified under tariff item 4202.32.90 (articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag; with outer surface of sheeting of plastics or of textile materials; other), and be subject to a duty rate of 8%.
- This verification priority was released in and a second round of verifications in , and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Rounds 1-2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39 | 34 | 31 | 91% | $103,133 | $2,230,478 | $41,250 | $2,374,861 |
- The results of the first round show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified under tariff item 4202.32.90 of the Customs Tariff.
Olive oil (Round 2)
Harmonized System Number(s): Headings 15.09 and 15.10
Harmonized System Number(s): Headings 15.09 and 15.10
- The risk identified is that imported goods could be incorrectly classified as olive oil (under Heading 15.09) or others oils obtained solely from olives (under Heading 15.10), which are duty free, instead of being properly classified elsewhere within Chapter 15, and be subject to duty rates up to 11%.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 24 | 20 | 83% | $241,404 | $546,055 | $5,700 | $793,159 |
- A second round of verifications was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 37 | 15 | 41% | $557 | $4,226 | $3,525 | $8,308 |
- The results of the first two rounds show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified under tariff item 1517.90.99 of the Customs Tariff.
Pickled vegetables (Round 4)
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 20.01
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 20.01
- The risk identified is that dill pickles or baby dill pickles may be misclassified within Heading 20.01.
- Misclassification results in an avoidance of the 8% duty payable for subheading 2001.10, which would be the appropriate classification for pickles.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
- A second round of verifications was released in , and a third one in , and they are also complete.
| Targeted companies (Rounds 1-2-3) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | 58 | 35 | 60% | $113,975 | $412,668 | $21,150 | $547,793 |
- A fourth round of verifications was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 4) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93 | 86 | 50 | 58% | $78,163 | $459,340 | $61,800 | $599,303 |
- The results of the first four rounds show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified under tariff items 2001.10.00 (cucumbers and gherkins) and 2005.99.90 (other vegetables) of the Customs Tariff.
Gloves (Round 2 - new)
Harmonized System Number(s): Headings 39.26 and 42.03
Harmonized System Number(s): Headings 39.26 and 42.03
- The risk identified is that imported goods could be incorrectly classified as gloves within Headings 39.26 and 42.03, instead of being properly classified within Chapter 61 or 62, and potentially be subject to higher duty rates up to 18%.
- This verification priority was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | 33 | 24 | 73% | $188,213 | $975,047 | $38,800 | $1,202,060 |
- A second round of verifications was released in . Results are not yet available.
- The results of the first round show that the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified under Chapters 39, 40, 42, 62 and 65 of the Customs Tariff.
Safety headgear (Round 4)
Harmonized System Number(s): Subheading 6506.10
Harmonized System Number(s): Subheading 6506.10
- The risk identified is that safety headgear could be incorrectly classified under duty-free tariff items, whereas the goods could potentially be properly classified as other safety headgear under tariff item 6506.10.90, which attracts a duty rate of 8.5%.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
- A second round of verifications was released in and is also complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1-2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 28 | 23 | 82% | $88,711 | $241,433 | $58,200 | $388,344 |
- A third round of verifications was released in and a fourth one in . The results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Rounds 3-4) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 | 24 | 18 | 75% | $159,151 | $430,236 | $45,850 | $635,237 |
- The results of the first four rounds show that the vast majority of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified under tariff item 6506.10.90 of the Customs Tariff.
Bags (Round 2 - new)
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 42.02
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 42.02
- The risk identified is that imported goods could be incorrectly classified as bags within Heading 42.02, instead of being properly classified elsewhere within the same heading, and potentially be subject to duty rates up to 11%.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 20 | 16 | 80% | $93,370 | $1,333,062 | $4,050 | $1,430,482 |
- A second round of verifications was released in . Results are not yet available.
- The results of the first round show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified elsewhere within Heading 42.02 of the Customs Tariff.
Import permit numbers (Round 2)
Harmonized System Number(s): Chapters 2 and 4
Harmonized System Number(s): Chapters 2 and 4
- The risk identified is that imported goods could be classified under “within access commitment” tariff items within Chapter 2 (meat of bovine animals and poultry) and Chapter 4 (dairy products), without the required import permit number on the declaration.
- Those chapters include goods that are subject to tariff rate quotas (TRQs) under Canada’s supply management system.
- TRQ goods imported without the required import permit number are properly classified under “over access commitment” tariff items and are subject to very high duty rates.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 174 | 174 | 60 | 34% | $631,843 | $4,103 | $56,050 | $691,996 |
- A second round of verifications was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 224 | 103 | 65 | 63% | $502,677 | $0 | $335,650 | $838,327 |
- The results of the first two rounds show that in most cases, the importers had incorrectly declared their import permit numbers, or they were not in possession of valid ones, in which case the goods were re-classified under an “over access commitment” tariff item of the Customs Tariff.
Other mountings and fittings, suitable for furniture
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 83.02
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 83.02
- The risk identified is that imported goods could be incorrectly classified as mountings and fittings, suitable for furniture, within Heading 83.02, instead of being properly classified elsewhere within various chapters, and be subject to duty rates up to 6.5%.
- This verification priority was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 11 | 11 | 100% | $24,517 | $265,589 | $6,500 | $296,606 |
- The results show that the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified within Heading 83.02 of the Customs Tariff.
Air heaters and hot air distributors (Round 2 - new)
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 73.22
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 73.22
- The risk identified is that imported goods could be incorrectly classified as air heaters and hot air distributors within Heading 73.22, instead of being properly classified elsewhere within the same chapter, and be subject to duty rates up to 7.5%.
- This verification priority was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 12 | 11 | 92% | $48,381 | $221,426 | $6,050 | $275,857 |
- A second round of verifications was released in . Results are not yet available.
- The results of the first round show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified within Heading 73.21 of the Customs Tariff.
Flashlights and miners’ safety lamps (Round 2 - new)
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 85.13
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 85.13
- The risk identified is that imported goods could be incorrectly classified as flashlights and miners’ safety lamps within Heading 85.13, instead of being properly classified elsewhere within the same heading, and be subject to a duty rate of 7%.
- This verification priority was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 8 | 5 | 63% | $47,206 | $407,822 | $25,150 | $480,178 |
- A second round of verifications was released in . Results are not yet available.
- The results show that most of the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified elsewhere within Heading 85.13 or within Heading 94.05 of the Customs Tariff.
Stone table and counter tops (Round 2)
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 94.03
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 94.03
- The risk identified is that stone table and counter tops could be incorrectly classified under tariff item 9403.90.00, which is duty-free, instead of being properly classified under various tariff items within Heading 68.02, which attract duty rates up to 6.5%.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 13 | 13 | 100% | $57,394 | $572,086 | $3,900 | $633,380 |
- A second round of verifications was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 3 | 1 | 33% | $774 | $11,652 | $500 | $12,926 |
- The results of the first round show that the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified under Heading 68.02 or elsewhere within Heading 94.03 of the Customs Tariff.
Disposable and protective gloves (Round 4)
Harmonized System Number(s): Subheadings 3926.20 and 4015.19
Harmonized System Number(s): Subheadings 3926.20 and 4015.19
- The risk identified is that disposable and protective gloves, which are duty-free if the gloves qualify for specific end-uses, may be properly classified under tariff items 3926.20.91 or 4015.19.90, which attract a duty rate of 6.5% and 15.5% respectively.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
- A second round of verifications was released in , and a third one in , and they are also complete.
| Targeted companies (Rounds 1-2-3) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % Non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | 52 | 47 | 90% | $253,959 | $1,082,175 | $30,000 | $1,366,134 |
- A fourth round of verifications was released in . Results are not yet available.
- The results of the first three rounds show that the goods that were found to be misclassified were properly re-classified under tariff items 3926.20.91 and 4015.19.90, and under Headings 48.18, 62.10 and 63.07 of the Customs Tariff.
Parts of machines and mechanical appliances
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 84.79
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 84.79
- The risk identified is that imported goods could be incorrectly classified as parts of machines and mechanical appliances within Heading 84.79, instead of being properly classified elsewhere within various chapters, such as 39 and 73, and be subject to duty rates up to 6.5%.
- This verification priority was released in . Results are not yet available.
Other chemical products
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 38.24
Harmonized System Number(s): Heading 38.24
- The risk identified is that imported goods could be incorrectly classified as other chemical products within Heading 38.24, instead of being properly classified elsewhere within various chapters, such as 15 and 38, and be subject to duty rates up to 11%.
- This verification priority was released in . Results are not yet available.
Valuation:
Apparel (Round 3)
Harmonized System Number(s): Chapters 61 and 62
Harmonized System Number(s): Chapters 61 and 62
- The risk identified is that, given the high rates of duty associated with the apparel industry (Chapters 61 and 62), importers of apparel may not be in compliance with the valuation provisions of the Customs Act. The duty rates vary from 10% to 18%.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
- A second round of verifications was released in and is also complete.
| Targeted companies (Rounds 1-2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143 | 143 | 86 | 60% | $6,213,743 | $59,756,490 | $216,300 | $66,186,533 |
- A third round of verifications was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 3) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | 67 | 32 | 48% | $1,321 | $16,077,270 | $95,900 | $16,174,491 |
- The results of the first three rounds show that many goods were found to be valued incorrectly (example: assists were not added to the price paid or payable).
Footwear (Round 2)
Harmonized System Number(s): Chapter 64
Harmonized System Number(s): Chapter 64
- Given the high rates of duty associated with footwear (Chapter 64), there is a risk that importers of footwear may not be in compliance with the valuation provisions of the Customs Act. The duty rates vary from 10% to 20%.
- This verification priority was released in and is now complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 16 | 7 | 44% | $380,334 | $2,351,737 | $1,950 | $2,734,021 |
- A second round of verifications was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64 | 12 | 4 | 33% | $5,317 | $74,310 | $2,000 | $81,627 |
- The results of the first two rounds show that many goods were found to be valued incorrectly (example: freight charges and service fees were not added to the price paid or payable).
Origin:
Bedding and drapery (Round 2)
Harmonized System Number(s): Various goods of Headings 63.01, 63.02 and 63.03
Harmonized System Number(s): Various goods of Headings 63.01, 63.02 and 63.03
- The risk identified is that manufacturers in the United States of America were using fabrics not produced in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) territories as an input for bedding and drapery (under Headings 63.01, 63.02 and 63.03), but were declaring the goods as “Made in USA” in order to qualify for NAFTA.
- This verification priority was released in , and is now complete.
| Targeted companies (Round 1) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 15 | 8 | 53% | $57,385 | $558,930 | $525 | $616,840 |
- A second round of verifications was released in and the results to date are included in the following table.
| Targeted companies (Round 2) | Cases closed | Cases in error | % non-compliance | Detailed adjustment statement issued ($) | Self-adjustments by importers ($) | Penalties ($) | Total ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 17 | 6 | 35% | $0 | $204,936 | $43,950 | $248,886 |
- The results of the first two rounds confirmed that some of the products that were verified did not qualify under NAFTA because of the inputs used in their production.
- Date modified: